[Ron]

Originally Posted by 350matt

there's some good points raised here, and I believe its worth trying

but only once you're up over 300Bhp

My thoughts are possible power increases across the board on power levels below 300rwhp. Doesn't the 210 spin at close to full tilt on stock boost?

and yes ECUtek allows you offset / rescale the MAF so you can fit a larger MAF tube with the stock plug in part

Wow, this ECUTEK appears to be very flexible, all while using the stock ecu.

and you can get a larger TB from Cusco and MAP performance - but I've yet to seee any gains published for these

Probably wouldn't see much of a difference from 65mm to 67mm, and you would see no difference if the sc inlet opening is 65mm with a 67 mm TB attached.

Originally Posted by sam69

Could a TB like this one be used off a LS2 motor



It has 6 pinouts like the 86 but I have no idea if they are the same re voltage etc as I cannot find a pinout diagram for the 86 .
Has anyone got the pinouts for the 86 ?

Being an old bloke I'm just throwing this out there to see if it's possible so maybe Ron or someone with more knowledge could respond.

I can easily make up a bigger Maf tube and piping to the TB etc .

I'm not sure about compatibility between different fly by wire TB. If I had to guess, I don't see why ECUTEK wouldn't be able to sync with this TB but perhaps someone more knowledgeable can chime in. Curious to know what size TB this is and what size is the inlet the TB mates to?

Originally Posted by cdrazic93

Ok so, here's the deal. The TB isn't small for this car, at all. If it was restrictive beyond 300whp don't you think there would be more options other than JUN and Cusco? Others who have torn this motor apart and critiquing it, not once by FBM, MAP, Full-Race, JDL, or any of the tuners have said anything about the TB.

I didn't realize these companies build twinscrew compressor kits. If they do, they are doing so missing the most critical element.


Ron