View Single Post
Old 01-13-2015, 11:48 PM   #67
Tromatic
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,232
Thanks: 61
Thanked 1,728 Times in 786 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braces View Post
Well ... Let's look at other successful car manufacturers and a few of their model progressions.

Cayman ... Cayman S ... Cayman R
911 ... 911S ... 911C4 ...911C4S ...911GT3 ...911Turbo ... 911Turbo S
Corvette ... Corvette GS ... Z06 ... ZR1
Audi A () ...Audi S () ... Audi RS () .... R8 ... R8plus
Ford Mustang (6 cyl) ....Mustang 5.0 .... Shelby GT350 ... Shelby Supercharged
Mercedes ....Mercedes AMG
BMW ... BMW M
Ferrari 360 .... 360CS
Ferrari F430 ... F430 Scud

There are plenty of examples. Nothing wrong with starting out with a base model and then offering future upgraded models. It keeps the existing model line fresh and prolongs its life.
AMG Scion? FR-S M? If anything, the FR-S becomes the rumored cheaper version and Toyota takes over the big fun. At the end of the day, it's a freakin' Subaru econobox with a sexy body.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAEMANO View Post
Toyota beat Nissan to the punch.

There's not only a lot of Toyo 2000GT in the '86, but a few shakes of Datsun 240z as well. Now Nissan has to go in another direction while still trying to work in whatever current design language they can. Yes the same design language that shat the Ju(n)ke from Nissan's wretched womb.
I've always wanted an original 240, but that won't happen.

Not Nissan's design. If it were, "shut up and take my money."
Tromatic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tromatic For This Useful Post:
DAEMANO (01-14-2015)