View Single Post
Old 01-09-2015, 12:24 PM   #6
Shankenstein
Frosty Carrot
 
Shankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 431 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosier Daddy View Post
They never do actually. We tune for speed and consistency only. What that entails will depend on the configuration of the car. Flat ride is an OEM philosophy and if that's what's required to be fast then it's soley by coincidence.
From your testing, what would you expect to be the bias on our cars for road race tuning?

Looking at the RCE Tarmac 2 Clubsport (as an example), they use 400/400 spring rates, which puts a ~23% biased towards the front (using the motion ratios from my data thread). Stock is ~27% biased toward the rear.

I've always heard that autocross and racing with RWD tends to work well using a stiffer front than rear. You get a planted feel during slaloms, but better power delivery. There is a penalty with regard to weight transfer, but it's faster because each end of the car can do its job more effectively.
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX
Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club
Shankenstein is offline   Reply With Quote