View Single Post
Old 05-08-2012, 05:59 PM   #28
SkullWorks
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SSM LT MT BRZ
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,033
Thanks: 803
Thanked 754 Times in 328 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by arghx7 View Post

It's not going to use the D-4S system because there's really no point in doing so. The D-4S system, as currently implemented, is expensive and only makes sense for n/a engines. I suspect this new engine will have one solenoid-type multi-hole injector positioned between the intake valves.


Negative Charlie.

DI and FI are highly compatible, "as currently implemented" doesn't mean a whole lot, the hardware is there...tune it for turbo...control strategy changes for everything lets not make it out like different shape injectors are needed for turbo, the hardware can go unchanged (except potentially flow rate)

Charge cooling is one of the largest benefits of DI systems and they are all but lost on a N/A motor....FI loves DI
SkullWorks is offline   Reply With Quote