Thread: Greddy turbo
View Single Post
Old 11-24-2014, 10:52 PM   #104
midnight23
dying bird under the hood
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 SWP Limited BRZ
Location: Disneyland, California
Posts: 1,331
Thanks: 546
Thanked 451 Times in 295 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ofuts View Post
Hi, thanks for the reply.
Everyone suggested me to go with 3" catback if i was thinking about turbo FI, so i thoughed it effects the flow regardless of bottleneck of the system, and that free-flow effects the turbo performance greatly.
There will eventually be an outflow at one point, catback right now, but it can olso be overpipe or frontpipe, bottleneck will stay as downpipe. I guess a high-flow cat will make some difference for performance so thats the main reason i'm leaning on this, making it 3" would be better ofcourse. Not considering overpipe too much but read that curve of overpipe is only needed for JDM spec cars, so eliminating that curve can olso make a difference.
So my question is, am i thinking wrong, is it not worthed? I mean if there will be only around 5-8whp differnce after turbo, it is for sure not worthed the money, time and potential problems, which are more difficult to solve here in China.
3" front pipe catback will get best flow, leave overpipe 2.5" for less issues
__________________
GReddy Turbo BRZ tuned by Evasive Motorsports
Build Thread
Instagram
midnight23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to midnight23 For This Useful Post:
Reaper (11-25-2014)