Quote:
Originally Posted by BRZZZZZZZZZZ
|
Sometimes following the FastTrack labels is tricky, and you might have caught it appropriately, but it's still odd:
When this says "suggested", just consider it a done deal. This is the SEB suggesting it to be ratified by the BOD. I wouldn't ever put money on the BOD overruling the SEB's suggestion
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8dog11914
It appears that the 'Twins' were proposed to DS as well?
|
Similar vein, I wouldn't use the word "proposed" because of potential confusion. A lot of this is on the SCCA for not controlling language better than they do, but volunteers and yadayadayada...
The SEB/SAC should be the only ones proposing, though they use the wording "submitted for feedback". So people write letters that are "proposing", and a lot of it is pretty nonsensical. Should one dude's brainvomit really be considered a proposal?
They really should standardize. It's a request from letters. It's a proposal from the Committees for the membership to give feedback. The SEB is presenting the following rules referrals to the BOD (don't feel great about this, but suggestion sure doesn't sound as strong as the motion really is).