View Single Post
Old 09-23-2013, 05:32 PM   #71
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,099 Times in 3,030 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
Huh, you're telling me that Subaru designed engines follow a Subaru designed break in procedure? What a world.
That's not my point... as others have pointed out, it's a legal document. All I am saying is that this is a pretty universal "industry standard" that pretty much every car maker has adopted.

You know what's funny? Go on Google and search "______ break in period", insert your favorite car manufacturer. All the various forum threads are just like the ones on here, with people for/against a break-in period and generally everyone following the same procedures (500-1000 miles of varied RPMs, no redlining, etc etc)

The only way to determine if this works or not, is to separate a large enough sample set of owners who have owned their cars for over 10 years from new, and separate that sample into two groups of people who did a "recommended break-in procedure" and those that did not. And then, analyze the fuel and oil consumption of the cars after 10 years, as well as average maintenance costs of said vehicle.

I really don't think any car maker has this type of data, and until this data is published it's all just my word vs your word on the internet.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (09-23-2013), tech4pdx (09-23-2013)