Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   2014 FR-S AT - Realistic Gains ALL Bolt On (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55414)

F1fletch 01-10-2014 03:25 PM

2014 FR-S AT - Realistic Gains ALL Bolt On
 
Soooooo.....IF I stay NA, what is a realistic number to shoot for if I did the following:

Intake
Header with cats
Complete Exhaust with Cats and Resonator
ECU-Tek Programming

I understand the AT's lose about 10hp at the wheels to the Manuals so that being considered, could I get to 190 at the wheels? 230bhp? While I am sure some of you have gone with full bolt on's I haven't seen posts by anyone with AT, full bolt on's and programming. Sorry if I missed it. I know dyno's and opinions vary but I am trying to establish some realistic goals to acheive by summer. I know 6k will get me FI but I am leaving that off the table for now.

Thanks

Touge_ninja 01-10-2014 03:29 PM

On a Basic NA setup with the following parts:
Revworks UEL Headers
Injen Intake
Invidia N1 Catback
AVO Overpipe
J2 Catted front pipe
Stage 1 NA Tune

got me around 178WHP


If your talking about more realistic, then the only way to get to 190+ is by going FI. AT's lose more than just 10hp vs manuals. Alot also depends on the tuner and fuel quality.

here is my dyno sheet with above setup

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...7&d=1382683534

CircuitJerk 01-10-2014 03:44 PM

I hit 190 w E85 on a DynoJet
(All P&L) Catted header, Overpipe, catless front pipe & Catback
AVO silicone inlet tube, Perrin Foam filter <-- not very relevant I don't think...

Touge_ninja 01-10-2014 03:47 PM

<------doesnt trust corn fuel

Tye300 01-10-2014 03:56 PM

http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k8...pscefc8afe.jpg

Here's my Dyno sheet when my car was NA. Mods were revworks header, overpipe, testpipe, JDM TRD exhaust, HKS premium suction intake. We did a Dyno day with around 8 cars, 3 were ATs and we confirmed that the ATs were down 10whp from the MTs. That said, the MTs baselined around 155-160whp stock and the ATs baselined 140-145whp stock. After tuning almost everybody went up almost 20whp. But the ATs were still down 10whp.

Touge_ninja 01-10-2014 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tye300 (Post 1444289)
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k8...pscefc8afe.jpg

Here's my Dyno sheet when my car was NA. Mods were revworks header, overpipe, testpipe, JDM TRD exhaust, HKS premium suction intake. We did a Dyno day with around 8 cars, 3 were ATs and we confirmed that the ATs were down 10whp from the MTs. That said, the MTs baselined around 155-160whp stock and the ATs baselined 140-145whp stock. After tuning almost everybody went up almost 20whp. But the ATs were still down 10whp.

hmmm thats weird, let me dig around and look for my baseline dyno. i know mine was higher than 140

heres my baseline, Blue is stock and red was after injen intake install both are on OEM ECU tune

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...7E784FA895.jpg

Tye300 01-10-2014 04:12 PM

For some reason the Dyno numbers here always read lower than what you guys get over there. Must be the heat or humidity we have here.

Touge_ninja 01-10-2014 04:14 PM

hmmm i think so as well. didnt realize you were from Philippines, but i know from experience you guys get 100oct there easy so the numbers should be better.

F1fletch 01-10-2014 04:17 PM

Wow talk about variances in baseline's, sheesh. So aither way it looks like 20whp is max to be expected after all those mods and a tune, probably around 230 at the crank. Losing 50hp to the wheels is really bad, maybe it is just the nature of the beast. My current car is 335is which is notoriously underrated and put a healthy dose to the wheels (I know, I know not fair..). Looks like boosted may be the only way.

Touge_ninja 01-10-2014 04:26 PM

here is my turbo dyno sheet

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...2C6B301657.jpg

F1fletch 01-10-2014 05:27 PM

WOW, now those are some AT numbers right there!!!!

lickitysplit 01-10-2014 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by F1fletch (Post 1444202)
Soooooo.....IF I stay NA, what is a realistic number to shoot for if I did the following:

Intake
Header with cats
Complete Exhaust with Cats and Resonator
ECU-Tek Programming

I understand the AT's lose about 10hp at the wheels to the Manuals so that being considered, could I get to 190 at the wheels? 230bhp? While I am sure some of you have gone with full bolt on's I haven't seen posts by anyone with AT, full bolt on's and programming. Sorry if I missed it. I know dyno's and opinions vary but I am trying to establish some realistic goals to acheive by summer. I know 6k will get me FI but I am leaving that off the table for now.

Thanks

I hit 190hp 151tq with the mods in my sig on 93.

BlueDubbinTDI 01-10-2014 06:18 PM

Hot damn I had no idea we lost so much power...Ide be ok with 185ish NA but wouldn't even bother if I couldn't reach that without a miracle.


How much do you think a drop-in + catless front pipe would make on 93oct?

StormTrooper 01-10-2014 07:24 PM

At least you're not high altitude.... At 4500ft I'm down another 15-20 HP from stock. So my manual is as slow or slower than an auto.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.