![]() |
FR-S vs MX5 hardtop vs MR2 Spider hardtop...
Anyone driven all three?
Opinions on handling and day-to-day living? These were my two likeliest candidates for next daily driver. |
well, if you need two extra seats and cargo room the answer is quite clear.....
|
I didn't need the extra room by any means. My previous cars were, if anything, smaller. :-)
|
I've driven all three and I currently have a Spyder with a hard top and an FRS. The last model year that Spyders were imported in the US was 2005 and the hard tops are not that easy to find for less than $2400. For a daily driver the FRS is a better choice, IMHO.
|
Quote:
...And was the hardtop worth the investment? |
Quote:
|
a hardtop isnt really going to change the nature of the mr2 or miata. the miata is going to have the least interior space of all. its also going to be the most playful imo and its by far the easiest of the three to sort out the performance. plus the foolish see them as chick cars so you dont pay the stupid fanboy taxes that you see with other used "sports" cars.
|
Quote:
"Snap oversteer" was what came up in my reading, and that pretty well describes it. |
Quote:
|
The chassis in the MR2 flexes a shitload, and I kind of doubt a hardtop would fix that, but supposedly bracing is supposed to make it a lot better. I'd say practicality is not a huge issue as far as carrying plain old luggage/bags goes, if you want to get giant packs of drinks from Costco or something then it's a problem. If you get a hardtop and then remove the softtop along with all of the plastic, then the opening to the space behind the seats becomes quite nice and usable.
Someone recently posted on Spyderchat that they removed all the plastics in the front and just stuffed suitcases against the frame. I'm planning to add gas struts to the frunk so I don't have to use the stick to hold it up every time, and then remove the lid to the storage compartment and seal it with foam. That gives about 1.5 carryon suitcases worth of easily accessible space. If you get a luggage rack for the back then you can carry as much as a normal sedan. You could conceivably put in a larger plastic bin and fit some serious luggage but that would take a bit of work. I think if they followed the SW20/AW11 formula for luggage space it would've been much better. I'd buy an SW20 if it weren't so old :/ I recall seeing my first SW20 back in 2002, and I thought it looked old already then. |
I have driven two of the three. I just do not fit in the MX-5 comfortably so it is a total no-go for me. I have to agree that as a practical daily driver the FR-S is the hands down winner. As a weekend driver, canyon carver or second car the MR-S is just as good if not better. It is difficult for the FR-S to overcome the 500LB weight penalty it bears even with 60 more HP.
The MR-S handles much better than the heavier MR2 MK II and is not as prone to oversteer. I have owned both. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.