| AllDayJonRay |
02-27-2013 10:06 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ft_sjo
(Post 760338)
Why set that constraint? Surely any dyno can show a percentage increase before and after. The actual numbers are worthless as none of these chassis dynos are considered calibration devices.
|
^^^This
Did he seriously have that thread closed on purpose to drive the people away who are asking questions he doesn't want to answer?
Are people really not seeing how this guy is shady?
Why the testing constraint? I have a hunch. The gain from a filter is always going to be a function of a percentage increase in power. And when you consider that dynapacks tend to give results approximately 10% higher than a dynojet, the same % power increase will result in more hp gained on a dynapack.
He's clearly worried about test results. He doesn't believe that his filter will outperform the others. He's worried that it's only going to perform on par with the rest, which isn't a bad thing. I'm sure he'd still sell a ton of filters. He just wouldn't be able to post " 10+ hp gain" to market his filter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawaiian
(Post 760394)
Dont dynapacks run high, mustangs low, and jets seem to be the "standard"?
|
Yes, and this supports my 'hunch'. If the same exact test (same care, same day, same time, etc) on a mustang dyno and a dynapack, and there was a 5% gain in power, there would be approx. a 2hp difference in the gains seen between the two.
|