Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Torque gains, what does the job? (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18268)

JoeBoxer 09-26-2012 03:12 AM

Torque gains, what does the job?
 
I have a Motiv test pipe, Cosworth air filter, Perrin pulley, and Visconti Stage 1 flash coming with the group buy shipment. I know most are going for 200whp NA which i would like to see also when I get the E85 tune after on the fly map switching is available.

I really want to see more low to mid range torque even if its at the expense of a few hp. I'm going ask John if he can do my E85 flash for more torque but what else can i do? Nameless mentioned to me they have a couple header designs one being for the torque gains I want which I will probably get but which cat back or axle back exhaust do you guys think will offer the most low end power?

chulooz 09-26-2012 03:20 AM

Id say enjoy your ride now while waiting for some proven header designs; may not necessarily be the first to show gains in the market.

serialk11r 09-26-2012 03:27 AM

The only bolton that will really buy you low end torque at the expense of high end is some detuned cams.

Mars2 09-26-2012 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 460777)
The only bolton that will really buy you low end torque at the expense of high end is some detuned cams.

That's true with old style engine but not with VVT.
I come from Golf R32 who have VVT and their it's been prouved by many Dyno that:
- 264/260 make more torque around 3000 rpm than OEM cam and more high end hp
-268/264 make more torque around 3000 rpm than 264/260 cam and more high end hp
- 272/272 make same torque around 3000 rpm than 268/264 cam and more high end hp

When going for more duration on VVT you often get a win win.

serialk11r 09-26-2012 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mars2 (Post 460807)
That's true with old style engine but not with VVT.
I come from Golf R32 who have VVT and their it's been prouved by many Dyno that:
- 264/260 make more torque around 3000 rpm than OEM cam and more high end hp
-268/264 make more torque around 3000 rpm than 264/260 cam and more high end hp
- 272/272 make same torque around 3000 rpm than 268/264 cam and more high end hp

When going for more duration on VVT you often get a win win.

Taken into account. The OEM cams have quite long duration already, and they have crazy overlap in the midrange.

Of course I'm not totally sure but I think the evidence is pretty strong that the cams are somewhat high end oriented.

JoeBoxer 09-26-2012 04:14 AM

Cams may be an option down the road but i will keep that in mind. Do you guys think i need to keep some backpressure in the exhaust or get as free flowing as possible? I know turbo applications are different but Full Blown picked up a lot of torque when they added their 3" exhaust to their car.

uspspro 09-26-2012 05:15 AM

Honestly, the last E85 dyno John posted is pretty good low end. It is actually really good for a 2.0L 4-cyl NA. Take a look at the dynos from some other NA 2.0L engines.

A small turbo, a roots blower, or a bored/stroked bottom end will be the only ways to get a significant amount of additional low-end torque.

Some cams may increase power across the board, who knows... but I don't think the low-end will be much improved.

JoeBoxer 09-26-2012 06:16 AM

Yeah i should hold off on the exhaust until after the E85 tune i suppose and go from there.

Opposed 09-26-2012 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeBoxer (Post 460954)
Yeah i should hold off on the exhaust until after the E85 tune i suppose and go from there.

John didn't pick up that much power with exhaust on his E85 tune. And you already have the motive pipe. I would put the money elsewhere. Not sure what more you're expecting. Its an N/A 2.0l 4 cyl. Johns tune alone makes the low end and midrange much stronger.

xwd 09-26-2012 02:51 PM

Yeah so far the tunes plus parts at least with the E85 tunes hasn't really made much difference. Not sure how things are with 93, but I've seen tuning results from another vendor which shows gains with parts plus tuning. But the E85 tune so far has by far the biggest effect on mid range torque apart from a turbo kit.

gmookher 09-28-2012 06:23 PM

the timing changes are huge after applying the stage 1 map...on pumpgas


cant wait to try e85...psyched!

Mitch 09-28-2012 07:29 PM

A final drive ratio change might give you what you want at the expense of higher cruising rpm. Poor man's supercharger.

2forme 09-28-2012 08:06 PM

Joe, how much torque are you shooting for? My car just put down 162 to the wheels. I don't have a ton of mods.

JoeBoxer 09-28-2012 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2forme (Post 466234)
Joe, how much torque are you shooting for? My car just put down 162 to the wheels. I don't have a ton of mods.

What do you have done? I was looking at the E85 dyno sheet showing about 153 i was hoping for 165-170 but the numbers aren't the main thing just would like nice gains that aren't all the way at the top of the rev band.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.