Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   Upper oil pan baffle prototyping (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155112)

mkodama 11-15-2024 09:51 PM

Upper oil pan baffle prototyping
 
3 Attachment(s)
Upper oil pan baffle idea; is it worth trying? Ideas for improvement?

Downside is if it doesn’t work, I have to take out my engine, again. 😅

PS. With the engine stopped, the oil level is at the top of the upper oil pan and this baffle is submerged. With the engine above 5000RPM the oil level drops about 40mm exposing this baffle. Upper oil pan is ~62mm thick.

Tokay444 11-16-2024 06:12 PM

Oil already doesn’t return to the sump fast enough. This seems like it would exacerbate that.

cmiovino 11-19-2024 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tokay444 (Post 3610287)
Oil already doesn’t return to the sump fast enough. This seems like it would exacerbate that.

This was also my first though. Keeping the oil up top isn't the issue. It's getting the oil back down to the sump quick enough to get picked up. That's why overfilling the oil helps - it ensures there's oil down there to pick up.

This is also why lower baffles don't make a huge difference and didn't really solve the gen 2 issues.

mkodama 11-19-2024 01:00 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tokay444 (Post 3610287)
Oil already doesn’t return to the sump fast enough. This seems like it would exacerbate that.


Partially correct; the oil doesn’t return easily from the heads and timing cover because of the convoluted return path. The crankcase doesn’t have this issue, and this baffle doesn’t affect that other than maybe a little bit for the rear left head oil return.

Attachment 226279


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tokay444 11-20-2024 05:30 PM

So only a LITTLE worse head drainage. Got it. To what benefit then?

mkodama 01-11-2025 01:38 AM

Updates the design slightly; longer narrower louvers with more space in between to make the plate stronger. I also updated my 3D printed forming dies to be a little stronger.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...a18cee60f2.jpg

mkodama 01-11-2025 01:41 AM

And installed! Looks and feels reasonable.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...49e14b65a3.jpg

mkodama 01-11-2025 01:49 AM

I checked natural frequency to make sure nothing would vibrate at the same frequency as the engine. First in CAD, secondly by “plucking” the same corners as in CAD and measuring frequency. Everything seemed to be 614hz or higher, which is good! Less worries of vibration and fatigue. Trying to stay as far above the natural frequency of 4 piston engine at 7400RPM as possible, which is 247hz.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...776867ec59.jpg

mkodama 01-11-2025 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tokay444 (Post 3610388)
So only a LITTLE worse head drainage. Got it. To what benefit then?


In theory, less oil and air mass spinning around the crankshaft should hopefully mean less power loss and less oil mist going out the PCV.

Just a small optimization instead of the carryover part of an FB20 for less than $100 of prototyping material and some spare time as I wait for some pistons to arrive.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.