![]() |
Which Intake Would You Buy
Best intake for the BRZ/FR-S
|
TAKEDA and GReddy are the same.
My GReddy gave me 3.2whp over stock. No other mods. (Dyno proven) |
FI ;)
|
Where is the GrimmSpeed option?
|
Stock with aftermarket filter ;)
|
^^ This, yes please
|
Grimmspeed
|
Thanks for the input, and adding grimmspeed to the list even though its not on the poll.
|
K&N Filter + Mishimoto Silicon Pipe, which is like 5HP/5Tq on a good day.
|
Can we get ten more threads like this please!
|
Quote:
this is why nobody trusts forums. |
Quote:
|
I want to get an injen, ive read it gives the most out of most of the intakes out there. But than a again "on a good day" is a correct term. These things give such a minor boost in hp that weather temp really makes a difference. I mean if your fi engine made 300hp during the winter vs 295 in the summer who really cares about that 5hp difference.
|
The only one that will net meaningful gains is the one that is bolted to a supercharger.
You're assuming that some small aftermarket company can design a better tube than Subaru and Toyota who have no reason to restrict the engine in this way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What is this? The 519th thread on this now? FFS.
|
How about a poll asking which combination of lightweight crank pulley and lightweight flywheel is best? That's new, right?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
:)
|
Quote:
I gotta be meeeee.... |
Just pick the prettiest one or the one with the coolest sticker for your back window.
Many cars can benefit from an aftermarket intake. This is not one of them. |
|
Quote:
What is less restricted by the aftermarket "products"? I have yet to see a benefit from aftermarket intakes on modern cars. Feel free to prove me wrong, but you must PROVE me wrong, not just say "oem's are restricted" explain to me how with evidence. And imo a 5 hp gain on a dyno chart is irrelevant, too many variables and at best placebo gains. There is no benefit to the OEM "restricting" the intake. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here it is again. I know you already know this but it may have slipped from memory. Ready? Compromise. |
Quote:
|
I actually did see a thread that dyno tested a bunch of intakes a year or two ago and the only one that was better than stock was the TRD intake. But from memory irs pretty damn expensive compared to just buying an aftermarket filter for pretty much the same result. Dont ask me to find the thread either :P
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I only ever saw the one thread but those results wouldnt surprise me in the least.
|
Quote:
You've spouted a bunch of costs for developing hardware and implied that Toyota, of all people have shortchanged this car somehow, I'm wondering what exactly is not optimal. I do not doubt the aftermarket can make improvements over OEM's, this is not the case for modern air intakes. |
I really don't know which intake is the best for our cars but i got injen one.
It felt slight different from stock in performance, did add nice sound tho. Later I felt like it wasn't gettin enough air, so I took top lid off again I felt slight difference in throttle response. You can argue as much as you want that sucking hot air into engine is bad...owell I been running it for few months now and it's fine as a daily driver and canyon runs. I haven't done track autocross so probably in that case it's better to put lid back on. I want to either get aftermarket snorkel or hks air duct to see if that's ganna make even more difference. As for now injen gets the job done. Oh lol and one of my friends said my intake is louder than the exhaust lol (hks spec L) Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk |
I would do the Mishimoto intake as it wouldn't require the MAF adjustment.
|
Which Intake Would You Buy
I hate to be "that guy" but I've read so many different times I can't even count from forum members I know I can rely on that the stock intake is very well-designed and does not need to be replaced. If you're going for a change in sound then go for it but as far as performance goes it's pretty negligent. if you're still NA The most effective/accessible mod as far as I know (and I've done a lot of reading) is a catless header and a tune. Horsepower gains seem to be 15 to 20 and torque gains range from 10-15. That pulse torque dip elimination.
That is all. Thanks for reading :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
How this is still alive is beyond me
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk |
Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/460/1...dcccceb6_b.jpg10426167_477207389076612_4763004759425673493_n by Dallas Owen, on Flickr Completely stock car, no exhaust, no tune, nothing. Dyno session was completed on baseline, intake was installed on the dyno in the same hour to control all variables. https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3794/...21fd2c42_b.jpg10434141_477207265743291_6903090180086945151_n by Dallas Owen, on Flickr |
Quote:
I was referring to your statement "this is why nobody trusts forums" that requires the dyno. That is, I was making fun of your statement that can't be trusted because you had posted it on a forum. :) |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.