Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Which Intake Would You Buy (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=92698)

Subaru86 08-02-2015 05:01 AM

Which Intake Would You Buy
 
Best intake for the BRZ/FR-S

JTOFJPN 08-02-2015 07:23 AM

TAKEDA and GReddy are the same.

My GReddy gave me 3.2whp over stock. No other mods. (Dyno proven)

Fastbrew 08-02-2015 08:20 AM

FI ;)

Captain Snooze 08-02-2015 09:06 AM

Where is the GrimmSpeed option?

Billion 08-02-2015 03:48 PM

Stock with aftermarket filter ;)

yelsew 08-02-2015 03:52 PM

^^ This, yes please

cjd 08-02-2015 04:09 PM

Grimmspeed

Subaru86 08-02-2015 04:37 PM

Thanks for the input, and adding grimmspeed to the list even though its not on the poll.

SmartedPanda 08-02-2015 07:08 PM

K&N Filter + Mishimoto Silicon Pipe, which is like 5HP/5Tq on a good day.

raven1231 08-02-2015 07:12 PM

Can we get ten more threads like this please!

JTOFJPN 08-02-2015 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmartedPanda (Post 2343772)
which is like 5HP/5Tq on a good day.


this is why nobody trusts forums.

Ultramaroon 08-02-2015 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raven1231 (Post 2343776)
Can we get ten more threads like this please!

https://xothebump.files.wordpress.co...g-scowl-21.jpg

Vincenttam 08-02-2015 08:01 PM

I want to get an injen, ive read it gives the most out of most of the intakes out there. But than a again "on a good day" is a correct term. These things give such a minor boost in hp that weather temp really makes a difference. I mean if your fi engine made 300hp during the winter vs 295 in the summer who really cares about that 5hp difference.

strat61caster 08-02-2015 08:06 PM

The only one that will net meaningful gains is the one that is bolted to a supercharger.

You're assuming that some small aftermarket company can design a better tube than Subaru and Toyota who have no reason to restrict the engine in this way.

Ultramaroon 08-02-2015 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strat61caster (Post 2343805)
The only one that will net meaningful gains is the one that is bolted to a supercharger.

You're assuming that some small aftermarket company can design a better tube than Subaru and Toyota who have no reason to restrict the engine in this way.

Aftermarket manufacturers will disagree with you. I'm guessing they find their net financial gains quite meaningful.

Vincenttam 08-02-2015 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strat61caster (Post 2343805)
The only one that will net meaningful gains is the one that is bolted to a supercharger.

You're assuming that some small aftermarket company can design a better tube than Subaru and Toyota who have no reason to restrict the engine in this way.

The reason aftermarket products can so easily be better than what comes with your car is because original manufacturers use heavier materials, more restrictive products that not only goes by standards of law but also helps so they don't get a lawsuit in the long run and this reduces production cost. Aftermarket products are just more like, you want light and stainless steel? Here you go, what you want louder? We'll take the car off for you too.

tyrantcf 08-02-2015 10:07 PM

What is this? The 519th thread on this now? FFS.

Ultramaroon 08-02-2015 10:44 PM

How about a poll asking which combination of lightweight crank pulley and lightweight flywheel is best? That's new, right?

Captain Snooze 08-02-2015 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultramaroon (Post 2343938)
How about a poll asking which combination of lightweight crank pulley and lightweight flywheel is best? That's new, right?

You had to go there, didn't you? :slap:

Captain Snooze 08-02-2015 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JTOFJPN (Post 2343778)
this is why nobody trusts forums.

This statement looks dodgy. You need a dyno chart to validate it.

soulreapersteve 08-02-2015 10:49 PM

1 Attachment(s)
:)

Ultramaroon 08-02-2015 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Snooze (Post 2343944)
You had to go there, didn't you? :slap:

lolol...


I gotta be meeeee....

Tcoat 08-02-2015 10:59 PM

Just pick the prettiest one or the one with the coolest sticker for your back window.
Many cars can benefit from an aftermarket intake. This is not one of them.

Ultramaroon 08-02-2015 11:10 PM

http://i.imgur.com/mVxEtZ0.png

strat61caster 08-02-2015 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vincenttam (Post 2343895)
original manufacturers use heavier materials, more restrictive products that not only goes by standards of law

So which intake is lighter and how much lighter is it than stock?
What is less restricted by the aftermarket "products"?

I have yet to see a benefit from aftermarket intakes on modern cars. Feel free to prove me wrong, but you must PROVE me wrong, not just say "oem's are restricted" explain to me how with evidence. And imo a 5 hp gain on a dyno chart is irrelevant, too many variables and at best placebo gains.

There is no benefit to the OEM "restricting" the intake.

Captain Snooze 08-02-2015 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strat61caster (Post 2343978)
but you must PROVE me wrong,

Because internet.

Captain Snooze 08-02-2015 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strat61caster (Post 2343978)
There is no benefit to the OEM "restricting" the intake.

In a perfect world this is true but there are other considerations to take into account. Time to develop a better intake verses return on investment, expertise of designers, cost of manufacture, suppliers pricing (that is, does oem make the part them selves or subcontracted to an external supplier), does the engine still meet emission requirements at 200,000 kilometers? (or what ever Euro 4/5 is ).

Here it is again. I know you already know this but it may have slipped from memory. Ready?

Compromise.

ScoobsMcGee 08-02-2015 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soulreapersteve (Post 2343949)

What in the Green Hell is up with his hair? At least I think that's his hair. Is it? I'm so confused...

Billion 08-02-2015 11:51 PM

I actually did see a thread that dyno tested a bunch of intakes a year or two ago and the only one that was better than stock was the TRD intake. But from memory irs pretty damn expensive compared to just buying an aftermarket filter for pretty much the same result. Dont ask me to find the thread either :P

soulreapersteve 08-02-2015 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScoobsMcGee (Post 2343991)
What in the Green Hell is up with his hair? At least I think that's his hair. Is it? I'm so confused...

I think that's a decorative piece. Haven't seen this anime yet - hell, I don't even know what the name of it is. I'll get back to you once I find out. :P

Tcoat 08-03-2015 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Billion (Post 2343996)
I actually did see a thread that dyno tested a bunch of intakes a year or two ago and the only one that was better than stock was the TRD intake. But from memory irs pretty damn expensive compared to just buying an aftermarket filter for pretty much the same result. Dont ask me to find the thread either :P

There are a couple of independent Dino's done. None of them supported the claims made by the intake manufacturers. Even the TRD results were different between two independent tests. Overall any gains that were found were so low that they fell into the margin of error for dynos.

Billion 08-03-2015 12:11 AM

I only ever saw the one thread but those results wouldnt surprise me in the least.

strat61caster 08-03-2015 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Snooze (Post 2343985)
In a perfect world this is true but there are other considerations to take into account. Time to develop a better intake verses return on investment, expertise of designers, cost of manufacture, suppliers pricing (that is, does oem make the part them selves or subcontracted to an external supplier), does the engine still meet emission requirements at 200,000 kilometers? (or what ever Euro 4/5 is ).

Here it is again. I know you already know this but it may have slipped from memory. Ready?

Compromise.

You have not provided an answer, what exactly can be compromised on an air intake?

You've spouted a bunch of costs for developing hardware and implied that Toyota, of all people have shortchanged this car somehow, I'm wondering what exactly is not optimal.

I do not doubt the aftermarket can make improvements over OEM's, this is not the case for modern air intakes.

Binary_fission 08-03-2015 01:19 AM

I really don't know which intake is the best for our cars but i got injen one.
It felt slight different from stock in performance, did add nice sound tho. Later I felt like it wasn't gettin enough air, so I took top lid off again I felt slight difference in throttle response.
You can argue as much as you want that sucking hot air into engine is bad...owell I been running it for few months now and it's fine as a daily driver and canyon runs. I haven't done track autocross so probably in that case it's better to put lid back on.

I want to either get aftermarket snorkel or hks air duct to see if that's ganna make even more difference. As for now injen gets the job done. Oh lol and one of my friends said my intake is louder than the exhaust lol (hks spec L)

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

soundman414 08-03-2015 01:49 AM

I would do the Mishimoto intake as it wouldn't require the MAF adjustment.

Kronos 08-03-2015 02:55 AM

Which Intake Would You Buy
 
I hate to be "that guy" but I've read so many different times I can't even count from forum members I know I can rely on that the stock intake is very well-designed and does not need to be replaced. If you're going for a change in sound then go for it but as far as performance goes it's pretty negligent. if you're still NA The most effective/accessible mod as far as I know (and I've done a lot of reading) is a catless header and a tune. Horsepower gains seem to be 15 to 20 and torque gains range from 10-15. That pulse torque dip elimination.

That is all. Thanks for reading :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

drewbot 08-03-2015 02:58 AM

How this is still alive is beyond me

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

Kronos 08-03-2015 02:59 AM

Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JTOFJPN 08-03-2015 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Snooze (Post 2343946)
This statement looks dodgy. You need a dyno chart to validate it.

My personal dyno chart:

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/460/1...dcccceb6_b.jpg10426167_477207389076612_4763004759425673493_n by Dallas Owen, on Flickr


Completely stock car, no exhaust, no tune, nothing.

Dyno session was completed on baseline, intake was installed on the dyno in the same hour to control all variables.

https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3794/...21fd2c42_b.jpg10434141_477207265743291_6903090180086945151_n by Dallas Owen, on Flickr

Captain Snooze 08-03-2015 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JTOFJPN (Post 2344177)
My personal dyno chart:

Sorry, you missed the flippancy/sarcasm.
I was referring to your statement "this is why nobody trusts forums" that requires the dyno. That is, I was making fun of your statement that can't be trusted because you had posted it on a forum. :)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.