Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=72)
-   -   6th Gear Grind & Replaced Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47797)

Bonburner 09-28-2013 12:44 AM

6th Gear Grind & Replaced Transmission
 
So I've been having a grind on 6th gear for a long time I think since 5k miles or so.
I took my 86 in at 14.2k miles and I demanded they take apart my transmission and they said come back when toyota reps come.
They said that if there is no problem it would be $1000.00 labor charge - I told them take out the transmission there Is something very wrong.
So my 6th was damaged - it looked fine but a few of the teeth were chipped.
The worst was the synchros - apparntly my synchros were shot somehow.

Toyota agreed to take it out of their pocket on a replacement transmission - they said this was not warranted repairs.
But it seems that we have a lot of "grinding" issues on these forums.
They claimed that I was shifting too aggressively to which I had a blank face to their response.

We'll see how long this transmission lasts ..

:paddle:

Dezoris 09-28-2013 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonburner (Post 1238896)
So I've been having a grind on 6th gear for a long time I think since 5k miles or so.
I took my 86 in at 14.2k miles and I demanded they take apart my transmission and they said come back when toyota reps come.
They said that if there is no problem it would be $1000.00 labor charge - I told them take out the transmission there Is something very wrong.
So my 6th was damaged - it looked fine but a few of the teeth were chipped.
The worst was the synchros - apparntly my synchros were shot somehow.

Toyota agreed to take it out of their pocket on a replacement transmission - they said this was not warranted repairs.I
But it seems that we have a lot of "grinding" issues on these forums.
They claimed that I was shifting too aggressively to which I had a blank face to their response.

We'll see how long this transmission lasts ..

:paddle:

Did you skip gears when shifting? Ie going from 4th to 6th? Or 3rd to 6th?

Bonburner 09-28-2013 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezoris (Post 1238929)
Did you skip gears when shifting? Ie going from 4th to 6th? Or 3rd to 6th?

not often - the few times i did I would wait to rev match

hmong337 09-28-2013 02:13 AM

I wonder if all these grinding gear threads were really user error and not the gearbox itself...

ZionsWrath 09-28-2013 02:58 AM

You gotta be moving pretty fast to aggresively shift into 6th lol

Young_makaveli 09-28-2013 03:00 AM

Is your frs a 2012 or 2013 manufactured one ?

Im at 14xx km and have no issues

boxer 2.5 09-28-2013 03:04 AM

Yeah a grind in 6th? definitely not user error. Unless you're sitting there without the clutch pushed just jamming it into gear going 110 on the highway for funs.

Bonburner 09-28-2013 03:21 AM

my sig says when I got the car - the first month they were sold lol

i was averaging 28 mpg btw lol
i didn't shifted aggressively - almost always casually

never had the opportunity to track/hdpe/autox

Young_makaveli 09-28-2013 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonburner (Post 1239030)
my sig says when I got the car - the first month they were sold lol

i was averaging 28 mpg btw lol
i didn't shifted aggressively - almost always casually

never had the opportunity to track/hdpe/autox

Sorry on tapatalk lol

ZionsWrath 09-28-2013 03:24 AM

My car is in first 1000 vin. Dont notice any trans problems so far, at 20k miles

Sporran 09-28-2013 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezoris (Post 1238929)
Did you skip gears when shifting? Ie going from 4th to 6th? Or 3rd to 6th?

I'm not sure why that should even be an issue - my belief is that if the synchro's can't handle skipping a gear they have no business being in this gearbox in the first place.

The ratios are quite closely spaced so why should going from say 4th to 6th in our box be any different from going from 4th to 5th in a less sporty 5-speed vehicle?

I know there's many threads on this issue and many differing viewpoints too - I'm just trying to get a better understanding of what's going on with our gearbox.

I've been driving manual transmissions for over thirty years and never experienced anything like the issues this gearbox appears to have.

MIKE_909 09-28-2013 04:45 AM

I've had my trans replaced because of the synchro going out car was at 10k mile if anyone comes up with why there messing up that would be great news being I don't wanna have this problem again being they were a little stubborn to fix it in the first place

Rayme 09-28-2013 07:47 AM

Looks like just a bad batch of transmission, like everything else alot of people have no problems with it and others have weird problems like a 6th gear grind. Sound like a bad assembly, improperly pressed in gear or something like that...I mean a chipped 6th gear tooth? Sounds like something was binding, NOT being abused.

Mikem53 09-28-2013 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezoris (Post 1238929)
Did you skip gears when shifting? Ie going from 4th to 6th? Or 3rd to 6th?

That not going to cause an issue.. That's BS..
My corvettes, both with a T56 and the TR6060 had CAGS
Which would force the shifter from 1st to 4th gear if you were under
A certain speed. I also skip gears in this car with no issues. That's never
Been an issue with manuals.
There is something wrong with this tranny in its build from the factory..
They have some defective parts or are built with bad tolerances..
Skip shifting is common and not harmful unless there is something defective.. These trannys are not that fragile..

Dezoris 09-28-2013 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikem53 (Post 1239136)
That not going to cause an issue.. That's BS..
My corvettes, both with a T56 and the TR6060 had CAGS
Which would force the shifter from 1st to 4th gear if you were under
A certain speed. I also skip gears in this car with no issues. That's never
Been an issue with manuals.
There is something wrong with this tranny in its build from the factory..
They have some defective parts or are built with bad tolerances..
Skip shifting is common and not harmful unless there is something defective.. These trannys are not that fragile..

Had same issues in early S2000 gearboxs. Should and what actually happens are two different things.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sporran (Post 1239053)
I'm not sure why that should even be an issue - my belief is that if the synchro's can't handle skipping a gear they have no business being in this gearbox in the first place.

The ratios are quite closely spaced so why should going from say 4th to 6th in our box be any different from going from 4th to 5th in a less sporty 5-speed vehicle?

I know there's many threads on this issue and many differing viewpoints too - I'm just trying to get a better understanding of what's going on with our gearbox.

I've been driving manual transmissions for over thirty years and never experienced anything like the issues this gearbox appears to have.

Again had and saw S2000 Aisin trans during first two years of manufacturing with sams problems.

Muskokan 09-28-2013 10:12 AM

I skip 5th on the daily, because I simply don't find it necessary after coming off of 4th at 4k. Aslong as your not shifting early, then skipping a gear, resulting in bogging, I see no reason how this could hurt your transmission.

5th and 6th are also my smoothest gears to engage.

Unless I see hard proof that this could be harmful, I'm gunna go along with the theory that people simply just like telling other people how they should drive.

Mikem53 09-28-2013 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezoris (Post 1239221)
Had same issues in early S2000 gearboxs. Should and what actually happens are two different things.



Again had and saw S2000 Aisin trans during first two years of manufacturing with sams problems.

It's a defect in manufacturing then, it's not a characteristic of manuals.
Telling everyone not to skip gears or use the transmission "normally" is bad advice. I would rather deal with a defect then to avoid its symptoms.
A new transmission seems to be the cure. It's not a characteristic of this one.

Sporran 09-28-2013 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezoris (Post 1239221)
Had same issues in early S2000 gearboxs. Should and what actually happens are two different things.

Again had and saw S2000 Aisin trans during first two years of manufacturing with sams problems.


Much to my regret I never had an S2000 - very nice cars! What was the ultimate cause and solution to the gearbox problems they initially experienced?

Mikem53 09-28-2013 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sporran (Post 1239256)
Much to my regret I never had an S2000 - very nice cars! What was the ultimate cause and solution to the gearbox problems they initially experienced?

Similar to our issues.. Here is the TSB listings for the S2K. Bad 2nd gear assemblies, new fluid change.. Nothing said about issues caused by skipping gears, nonsense..

http://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/6814...ons-1999-2009/

tech4pdx 09-28-2013 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikem53 (Post 1239136)
That not going to cause an issue.. That's BS..
My corvettes, both with a T56 and the TR6060 had CAGS
Which would force the shifter from 1st to 4th gear if you were under
A certain speed. I also skip gears in this car with no issues. That's never
Been an issue with manuals.
There is something wrong with this tranny in its build from the factory..
They have some defective parts or are built with bad tolerances..
Skip shifting is common and not harmful unless there is something defective.. These trannys are not that fragile..

Bingo.. Same on my T56-equipped WS6. That came with CAGS too and skipping gears was no problem. Of course, almost everyone in my group ended up disabling that shit. I drove that car occasionally in the dead of winter (single digit temps) in Chicago. It was a rock solid unit. The trans in the twins feels like a rock tumbler by comparison. Love how people are blaming the trans problem on driving style..lol. I abused the hell out of my T56 and that motherfucker held up like a champ. Clutch dumps at 4k+, 6-4 downshifts on the freeway, well over a hundred passes at the strip, etc. All the while, our import buddies calling the f-bodies and vettes POS's.. Lmfao

Sporran 09-28-2013 12:41 PM

Thanks Mike, that's certainly interesting. The problems being encountered with the 86 gearbox certainly seem similar - let's see what Toyobaru have to say in the coming months. I wonder if there's an issue with quality control at Aisin?

Dezoris 09-28-2013 01:12 PM

I love how whenever you bring something up or raise questions people just want to talk shit on here without even knowing why.


Here read up on the links from the S2000. I went through this already had two of them. Read before you say its impossible.

http://s2000.com/forums/142883-post6.html
Post from Honda engineer about gear skipping. This trans is Aisin may have similar issues. Until we have answers or more data I would avoid skipping gears.

ZionsWrath 09-28-2013 01:22 PM

Also there was a TSB for civic si transmission, forget exactly what for but it instructed for tech to go on a ride along with owner and observe for skip shifting. Ever since I read that I always use all the gears when up shifting, double clutch rev match if skip shifting down, and rev match if shifting down one gear.

DoomsdayJesus 09-28-2013 01:49 PM

It's really disappointing that Toyota pulled this on you too. Subaru covered my 4th gear grind replacement under "customer goodwill" for a one time replacement, and said I was abusing it because I was shifting at 7000RPM.

You shouldn't have to pay a dime for this, fight them on it and talk to regional reps.

White64Goat 09-28-2013 01:57 PM

Interesting reading on the Honda stuff. I have never heard of replacing brass synchro rings with carbon fiber. That just doesn't sound right.

tech4pdx 09-28-2013 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White64Goat (Post 1239461)
Interesting reading on the Honda stuff. I have never heard of replacing brass synchro rings with carbon fiber. That just doesn't sound right.

Dry carbon or wet? Cuz u know dat wet stuff is not real :D

tech4pdx 09-28-2013 02:12 PM

6th Gear Grind & Replaced Transmission
 
On a serious note, these manufacturers are trolling us hard and we are the 1%, except if you are speaking to one of their marketing guys. 10+ years later and Aisin is still fixing the same problems.. Who would of thought?? Lol

Edit: should of gotten the auto..

Sporran 09-28-2013 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White64Goat (Post 1239461)
Interesting reading on the Honda stuff. I have never heard of replacing brass synchro rings with carbon fiber. That just doesn't sound right.

Yes, very interesting reading indeed. However when the manufacturer fits a close ratio gearbox with a short throw gearlever but we are now being encouraged not to change quickly, well it sounds to me like a design flaw being hidden by a band-aid.

Bonburner 09-29-2013 07:03 PM

I already talked with the scion/toyota reps of the district and they told me it was out of good courtesy.

According to their break down there was no sign of abuse/racing - to which I never did anyways.

Interesting Side note from this transmission to my first:
1 - 2 drops more RPM than my first.
3-4 less rpm drop almost feels like 300 rpm.

another note - I feel like I can feel synchros lining up before I shift in .. odd lol


ive been debating double clutching but still not sure if I should bother lol

Young_makaveli 10-01-2013 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonburner (Post 1240962)
I already talked with the scion/toyota reps of the district and they told me it was out of good courtesy.

According to their break down there was no sign of abuse/racing - to which I never did anyways.

Interesting Side note from this transmission to my first:
1 - 2 drops more RPM than my first.
3-4 less rpm drop almost feels like 300 rpm.

another note - I feel like I can feel synchros lining up before I shift in .. odd lol


ive been debating double clutching but still not sure if I should bother lol

Don't double clutch..its bad for the car

Fizz 10-01-2013 06:15 AM

Can u explain why its bad? I thought double clutching would help reduce strain on synchros

Young_makaveli 10-01-2013 07:35 PM

6th Gear Grind & Replaced Transmission
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fizz (Post 1243524)
Can u explain why its bad? I thought double clutching would help reduce strain on synchros

Well i goggled if double clutching was good or bad and alot of forums say that its not good and strains the transmission more than without double clutching.

Ill try and find the link and post it up here for you

Edit: http://www.civicforums.com/forums/17...-good-bad.html

ZionsWrath 10-01-2013 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Young_makaveli (Post 1244891)
Well i goggled if double clutching was good or bad and alot of forums say that its not good and strains the transmission more than without double clutching.

Ill try and find the link and post it up here for you

Edit: http://www.civicforums.com/forums/17...-good-bad.html

Well I double clutch on downshifts (only when skipping gears though) everyday so I guess I'll let you guys know if I blow up my transmission. So far 15 months and 20k miles, no problems. I don't think its bad :iono:

Braces 10-01-2013 11:28 PM

Just reading this thread is pissing me off. The transmissions should be engineered well enough to handle much more abuse than a normal person could exact on it. I'm not talking about severe abuse, but normal shifting. I also consider skip shifting to fall within normal operation. These cars are ALL in their warranty periods. Toyota should GLADLY fix or replace any of these faulty transmissions without the BS. I understand what Dezoris is saying, but I'll be damned if I'm going to drive "cautiously"in case I hurt the car. Sorry for the rant.

tech4pdx 10-02-2013 01:48 AM

6th Gear Grind & Replaced Transmission
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Braces (Post 1245306)
Just reading this thread is pissing me off. The transmissions should be engineered well enough to handle much more abuse than a normal person could exact on it. I'm not talking about severe abuse, but normal shifting. I also consider skip shifting to fall within normal operation. These cars are ALL in their warranty periods. Toyota should GLADLY fix or replace any of these faulty transmissions without the BS. I understand what Dezoris is saying, but I'll be damned if I'm going to drive "cautiously"in case I hurt the car. Sorry for the rant.

This is typical warranty BS friend. I'm lucky to be able to take care of my car without worrying about warranties and dealerships. I've known many assholes (service advisors) at dealerships. They are not on your side. The marketing material is splendid though. :) A real treat.

Edit: I have the 6-5 grind. I have learned that if I shift real slow and just let it slip in, she doesn't grind. Any kind of quick shift.. No bueno.

ZZT86 10-02-2013 07:22 AM

In my 12.5 year ownership of my high revving 6sp celica I have often skipped gears especially from 4th to 6th. The car recently clocked over 320K's & the box is working just fine. My 86 6sp is not far from 10K and it too is just fine, except for the cold start grind from 1st-2nd & 2nd-3rd on occasions (no adjustment or fluid change yet).

PERRIN_Chris 10-02-2013 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Young_makaveli (Post 1244891)
Well i goggled if double clutching was good or bad and alot of forums say that its not good and strains the transmission more than without double clutching.

Ill try and find the link and post it up here for you

Edit: http://www.civicforums.com/forums/17...-good-bad.html


Sure maybe double clutching might put a little more wear on the clutch parts, but it's easier on the transmission in certain situations. I usually only double clutch when I'm going into first when I'm moving and going under 10 mph.

Young_makaveli 10-02-2013 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PERRIN_Chris (Post 1246352)
Sure maybe double clutching might put a little more wear on the clutch parts, but it's easier on the transmission in certain situations. I usually only double clutch when I'm going into first when I'm moving and going under 10 mph.

Yeah i do it also only when i have too

I meant if you do it all the time then it might cause more wear in a long run

rice_classic 10-02-2013 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Young_makaveli (Post 1244891)
Well i goggled if double clutching was good or bad and alot of forums say that its not good and strains the transmission more than without double clutching.

Ill try and find the link and post it up here for you

Edit: http://www.civicforums.com/forums/17...-good-bad.html

If anyone is telling you that Double Clutching is harder on the transmission vs regular shifting, they probably need to wear a helmet before they leave the house.

Double Clutching is quite literally syncing the 2 shafts without having to use the synchro to do it. When you double clutch your synchros do almost no work.


Edit: that civicforum link is specifically asking about the clutch/engine. Double clutching means you are pressing on the clutch pedal more often but usually when a double clutch is performed so is a rev match. No extra wear or stress occurs on the engine (probably less due to rev match) and the clutch is doing a negligible amount of extra work. The only thing that's actually getting more use is the throwout bearing. Reading that thread cost me 2 IQ points. I feel dumber after reading it.

TheseColorsDontRun 10-02-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tech4pdx (Post 1245523)
I have learned that if I ... just let it slip in, she doesn't grind.

Wise words.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.