Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Report: BRZ STI Model Already in the Works, No Turbocharger (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4504)

Sport-Tech 03-28-2012 08:38 AM

Report: BRZ STI Model Already in the Works, No Turbocharger
 
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/au...i_planned.html

No turbocharger:
Quote:

It is likely to produce around 250bhp. "We can definitely develop the intake system," Atake said. "There is certainly room for improvement there." In addition, there is likely to be a freer-flowing exhaust and modifications to the engine's variable valve control system, along with an even higher rev limit of around 7,500rpm.
Full article:
Quote:

Subaru has given the biggest hint yet that it is developing a hot STI version of its BRZ sports car – and there's a roadster on the way too.

Talking to Auto Express at the launch of the new rear-wheel drive coupe, global marketing manager Atoshi Atake, said: "We have already had many requests from interested customers regarding a faster version. Let me say this - we will certainly satisfy our customers. We are already working on a faster version."

The new range-topping model is expected to take inspiration from the STI concept revealed at the 2011 Los Angeles Motor Show. Under the bonnet will be a more powerful version of the 197bhp 2.0-litre flat-four cylinder 'boxer' from the standard car.

It is likely to produce around 250bhp. "We can definitely develop the intake system," Atake said. "There is certainly room for improvement there." In addition, there is likely to be a freer-flowing exhaust and modifications to the engine's variable valve control system, along with an even higher rev limit of around 7,500rpm.

Subaru says that it will not turbocharge the engine as there is no space at the front of the engine bay for an intercooler. "Plus, we want to keep turbocharging separate. It is for models like the WRX STI," said Atake. "The same goes for four-wheel drive. We could not make the BRZ four-wheel drive even if we wanted to." He also said that supercharging had been dismissed because it would make the BRZ too heavy on fuel.

As well as more power, the BRZ STI is set to weigh even less than the 1,250kg standard car, thanks to racing bucket seats and potentially a carbonfibre roof and bonnet, which will further help to lower the car's centre of gravity. Other tweaks will include a dramatic bodykit, stiffened and lowered suspension, lighter but larger 18-inch alloy wheels and upgraded brakes.

When asked if it was possible to make a convertible version of the BRZ, Atake said: "Yes, that is certainly possible. We already have pillarless doors - you can imagine how removing the roof would make the car look."

Subaru and Toyota have a global sales target of 100,000 models per year for the BRZ, and its sister car, the GT 86. Both cars go on sale in the UK in June, but sales have already begun in Japan where Subaru has sold 3,551 models in the last two months - four times what it expected.

NERO 03-28-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scion FR-S (Post 167915)

So the same things that the aftermarket community will end up doing and I don't have to wait 2 years. Either way it's fine with me.

Hanzo 03-28-2012 08:46 AM

So glad they are not going the force induction rout!

zigzagz94 03-28-2012 08:53 AM

250 NA with a slight weight reduction would be perfect for my intended purposes...

hope they release it next year and not at the mid-cycle refresh.

Subaruwrxfan 03-28-2012 10:05 AM

Sweet, I was hoping to hear something like this. That means almost all of that power can be accomplished in the aftermarket. I knew there was some N/A potential left in this motor without building it. Means we should get some nice gains from a good intake and exhaust.

powertrip 03-28-2012 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subaruwrxfan (Post 167968)
Sweet, I was hoping to hear something like this. That means almost all of that power can be accomplished in the aftermarket. I knew there was some N/A potential left in this motor without building it. Means we should get some nice gains from a good intake and exhaust.

Don't get your hopes up. To eek out another 50hp on this motor would likely entail more aggressive variable timing, tuning, higher redline, and probably boring out the motor.

I/H/E/tune on a 2.0L, you might, might get 20hp tops. but dont count on it. The car is pretty well optimized at 200, any gains will be expensive and require mods that are generally best done by the factory.

IntenseDVDA 03-28-2012 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zigzagz94 (Post 167922)
250 NA with a slight weight reduction would be perfect for my intended purposes...

hope they release it next year and not at the mid-cycle refresh.

I would be very surprised if they released this version next year. We'll see.

Hanzo 03-28-2012 10:17 AM

There is no reason for them to rush this. The current spec car is selling like hot cakes in Japan and is about to in the rest of the world.

switchlanez 03-28-2012 11:04 AM

It's crazy that they're leaking this info this early before the base model is released! Won't have to wait as long as I expected. No FI means less rapid heating/cooling (reliability)... always good for the head gaskets.

G-Man 03-28-2012 11:08 AM

this makes me happy

KevinDuMa 03-28-2012 11:18 AM

It makes much more sense, BRZ is the NA, lightweight, rwd coupe and the WRX will be the awd turbo monster

86'd 03-28-2012 11:26 AM

This would almost make it a Cayman. And I'm sure, as much as I'd like one, it'd be too expensive for me. At least the cost of an WRX STI.

I've had a hunch from the beginning though and looking at the dynos so far, that there is some breathing room up top. I think (and hope) we'll be surprised on what a few mods and a tune will do.

zigzagz94 03-28-2012 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 168010)
It's crazy that they're leaking this info this early before the base model is released! Won't have to wait as long as I expected.



The fact that all of these people in official capacity for Subaru are already talking about higher performance versions, coupled with Toyota saying they want to release a different variant every year, makes me also believe this "BRZ STi" will show up sooner rather than later.

ZetaVI 03-28-2012 11:29 AM

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...lopment-report

M-17 03-28-2012 11:40 AM

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2453/...82ca545b5d.jpg

YYYEEEESSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

switchlanez 03-28-2012 11:41 AM

Guys, the +50 hp was never quoted from Subaru. The editor who wrote the article probably put that figure in as his own opinion/speculation.

Dave-ROR 03-28-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hanzo (Post 167919)
So glad they are not going the force induction rout!

Same. This almost makes me want to wait. Maybe it'll be released in May 1st, 2014 and we'll find out the price of it April 30th, 2014. :)

M-17 03-28-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 168054)
Guys, the +50 hp was never quoted from Subaru. The editor who wrote the article probably put that figure in as his own opinion/speculation.

http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lj...4pifo1_500.jpg

Awwwe......

zigzagz94 03-28-2012 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 168054)
Guys, the +50 hp was never quoted from Subaru. The editor who wrote the article probably put that figure in as his own opinion/speculation.

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/2...-review-video/


True....BUT, in the autoblog article they asked Toshio Masuda the BRZ senior project manager:

"I asked Masuda-san point-blank if indeed there will be an STI-style turbocharged BRZ by the time this generation reaches the middle of its life in two-and-a-half or three years. A number came out of his mouth that raised my eyebrows. "In future, there is the thought to have as much as 280 horsepower."


So the 250hp is possible and maybe Atake is being conservative. How they get to that HP is still up in the air though.

RaceR 03-28-2012 12:12 PM

250NA HP with STI performance stuff and look! :wub:
Awesome news!

Turbowned 03-28-2012 12:25 PM

Doesn't seem like the best idea to be leaking this now, I agree. If they come out with anything resembling a release date for it, I'm pulling my deposit and holding out for the STi model... I just hope I can still put a supercharger on it if they bump up the power while still keeping it N/A. I guess they couldn't increase C/R much more than they already have.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scion FR-S (Post 167915)

http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u...er/DUDEBRO.jpg

switchlanez 03-28-2012 12:27 PM

The FA20 can be engineered to attain +50 or +80 HP if you let engineers have at it without reserve (extreme case of a car without compromise: MP4-12C). +50 NA HP would be awesome but also awesomely expensive. As a massed-produced car, they also have to consider cost, reliability, fuel efficiency, etc. and dial back a bit. Probably the most direct way to achieve this starts by increasing displacement.

vaporiz 03-28-2012 12:27 PM

I'm kinda glad they're not turbocharging it. I like how they're sticking to the original theme of the BRZ.

I'm interested in how the "dramatic" body kit will look.

SUB-FT86 03-28-2012 12:31 PM

I hope they use a damn 2.5 for this one.

Cessblood 03-28-2012 12:34 PM

I have to see it to believe it

7thgear 03-28-2012 12:37 PM

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instanc...x/17306219.jpg

Cessblood 03-28-2012 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 168010)
It's crazy that they're leaking this info this early before the base model is released! Won't have to wait as long as I expected.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbowned (Post 168095)
Doesn't seem like the best idea to be leaking this now, I agree. If they come out with anything resembling a release date for it, I'm pulling my deposit and holding out for the STi model... I just hope I can still put a supercharger on it if they bump up the power while still keeping it N/A. I guess they couldn't increase C/R much more than they already have.

I agree.

SPCorBUST 03-28-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vaporiz (Post 168099)
I'm kinda glad they're not turbocharging it. I like how they're sticking to the original theme of the BRZ.

I'm interested in how the "dramatic" body kit will look.

the concept car was not dramatic. probably similar to that... IMO tastefully done w/ exception of the wing.

Subaruwrxfan 03-28-2012 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by powertrip (Post 167972)
Don't get your hopes up. To eek out another 50hp on this motor would likely entail more aggressive variable timing, tuning, higher redline, and probably boring out the motor.

I/H/E/tune on a 2.0L, you might, might get 20hp tops. but dont count on it. The car is pretty well optimized at 200, any gains will be expensive and require mods that are generally best done by the factory.

I'm not expecting 50 hp from intake and exhaust alone, but if he says himself that there is definitely room for improvement on the intake and exhaust, then that means they didn't even attempt to maximize it's power output. +20 more hp for these mods, plus the lighter weight of an aftermarket exhaust (the stock one is pretty heavy) I think will do a lot for this car.

madfast 03-28-2012 01:04 PM

Quote:

global marketing manager Atoshi Atake, said
that's all i need to know. whatever he says is probably PR bullshite...

mrtodd 03-28-2012 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 168098)
The FA20 can be engineered to attain +50 or +80 HP if you let engineers have at it without reserve (extreme case of a car without compromise: MP4-12C). +50 NA HP would be awesome but also awesomely expensive. As a massed-produced car, they also have to consider cost, reliability, fuel efficiency, etc. and dial back a bit. Probably the most direct way to achieve this starts by increasing displacement.

Getting an extra 50HP out of this will be easy - especially considering the high C/R and the presence of direct injection. Here's some food for thought - consider the first generation Honda S2000, in the states it produced 240hp at the crank, in Japan it was 250hp. In the Honda community people were able to increase this number with simple bolt-ons, increase C/R, and minor tuning. Shit, there was even a company that improved the air flow CFM on the intake and exhaust porting on the head. All of this out of a 2-liter engine who's compression ratio was lower and lacked direct injection. If you think Subaru has to increase displacement to realistically achieve a goal of production @ 250hp, then their R&D department doesn't know shit about building NA engines. I really doubt they'll increase displacement. To be honest, chances are increasing displacement would cost even more in terms of R&D. Atoshi Atake was quoted stating that they (Subaru) are looking specifically at the intake system for the gains. This resonates perfectly to me when looking at the dyno sheet for the outgoing model. It looks like there is PLENTY of room for improvement in high rpm breathing, those stock cams look incredibly conservative - adding 50 more hp is a no brainer.

slimjoe 03-28-2012 01:26 PM

Hopefully if the BRZ STi come out, some of the parts will be transferable to the BRZ. Parts like the lightweight hood, probably not the roof since it'd be more than just the skin and that'd include cutting structural beams, brakes, and exhaust.

But yeah, at least then we would be able to have a lighter-weight version of the current BRZ.

RRnold 03-28-2012 01:31 PM

W-A-I-T-I-N-G!! :popcorn:

brianbot5000 03-28-2012 01:44 PM

The look-at-me carbon fiber hood would be a deal breaker for me. Sounds pretty cool though.

JoeJoseJoseph 03-28-2012 01:49 PM

Exactly! Already we get an aluminium hood and although a carbon fiber roof will be nice, a CF hood will only make it more expensive. As already told by someone else, in the range of WRX STi will be a deal breaker for me too. Enough of this waiting! They will bring better but expensive versions every year and then if i can afford a better one then, i will get, otherwise will be content with current car i'm getting this year itself!
Look at the 2012 Nissan GTR, 7K USD more, for not really much of more equipment or improvement

86fanatic 03-28-2012 01:55 PM

Anyone else notice the "250" horsepower figure was not actually inside a direct quote?

Between this "article" and the USA Today "article" that confirmed turbocharging, I'm tired of these reports borderline just making things up for page views or whatever.

Also the racing bucket seats and carbon fiber roof/hood lines were not in direct quotes either - they are probably just guessing from the STI concept a while back.

Revised intake and free flowing exhaust sounds good on paper, but that also makes me worried about whether the US market would even get that model with emissions and all.

tachi1247 03-28-2012 02:00 PM

It's all just rumors still. There are just as many other reviews out where they spoke to someone at Subaru who said they are going to turbo charge it.

I find it hard to believe that they can squeeze an extra 50 hp out of the current engine. If they do I can't see it being cost effective, especially when they will have a turbo FA20 sitting on the shelf which will make the same or more power. That is a lot of development cost on another engine for a car that they will sell very few of. If/when an STI version comes out, it will account for what ~15-20% of BRZ sales? It is already a low production car so you are going to be talking about less than 2000 cars a year.

Snoopyalien24 03-28-2012 02:00 PM

Yes this is exactly what I would have preferred! Thank you Subi!

Anyone know what kind of weight to hp this car would have compared to other cars?

Giccin 03-28-2012 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zigzagz94 (Post 167922)
250 NA with a slight weight reduction would be perfect for my intended purposes...

hope they release it next year and not at the mid-cycle refresh.

++++++++++


What's even more perfect?

33-35mpg.

Lol

Dark 03-28-2012 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giccin (Post 168248)
++++++++++


What's even more perfect?

33-35mpg.

Lol

LOL, What about cheaper gasoline price?

Sounds definitely interesting. Hope to see sometimes next year.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.