![]() |
pmccut's FBM dyno results
Just picked my car up from WORKS motorsports in Sonoma, CA after adding some goodies: ClutchMasters FX300, Perrin engine mounts, Perrin rear shifter bushing, and Perrin transmission support mount.
I'm e-tuning with Visconti. This is the fourth map so far. The fuel pump (dw 65c) had 2 o-rings and no white spacer originally, so I added a third myself, and WORKS just added the 4th before this dyno run. I'm waiting on FullBlown to send over a map for the 3BAR sensor as well, and plan to see if LJ can get the car running OK. The dyno run is absolutely terrible - 179hp, 180lb/ft http://emopride.net/squirrels/dyno.jpg Here's the really worrying plot - boost/afr. http://emopride.net/squirrels/boost_afr.jpg Right before the car goes into boost it goes really lean, then super rich. I have yet to drive this car fast, or even on a fun road. Someone keep my hopes up please |
Seems like a tune issue. No worries. Talk to John about it. I am sure he will get you running tip top in no time.
|
Why don't you flash in the base tune that Full Blown supplies with the kit?
How long has the car been in this condition (waiting for a proper tune)? |
Considering another Full Blown kit hit 13.7 with stock tires, it has to be the tune.
|
The results really are all in the tune. I don't know what to say because my Visconti tune was running nearly twice the boost you are running.
|
Quote:
|
Have you considered going to someone closer to you to do your tuning? It's a bit easier than the back and forth stuff. I know I had some issues with the fuel pump myself.
91 base map isn't that great either to be honest. Red line is base. I was thinking I was going to need to upgrade the clutch--not so much. (dyno dynamics) http://i619.photobucket.com/albums/t...psea2dcf69.png After a bit of tinkering this is the best that we could get out of 91 octane and a stock exhaust. California gas is crappy. A bit more than what the innovate kit puts out on this dyno. (mustang dyno) http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c1...pse89738ea.jpg Quote:
|
listen to King Tut. hes got his FBM kit running great at 320WHP and 260WTQ (give or take)
|
Quote:
Looks like you are local! Where are you located? I have to see your car please!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The back and forth is going to take some time, hopefully it wont be too long and you can get that running smoother.
The pump that comes with the full blown kit also needs the spacers? Where can I pick those up? |
Quote:
I haven't actually seen anyone posting good power levels for these kits on 91. I really just want to see my AFRs around the appropriate area, so it doesn't have knock correction everytime you enter boost - crazy. Can't wait for some corn |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well don't you have the stock map??
|
Quote:
|
wow thats bad
i was making 250 whp at 8psi with johns tune and i thought it was not good at all. talk to LJ @FullBlown he will get you a nice tune |
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
|
I'm gonna say yes. Not 100% sure what brand Lj runs
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I saw your car last week while your clutch was being installed. :)
May I ask why you just did not have him do his own custom tune? Is that a stock VS tuned turbo? or Tuned turbo VS non tuned turbo? Because if that was bone stock vs turbo that TQ is way higher than mine :P Pete's/Works dyno rates quite a bit lower than most. I think it is like 8-10% compared to my other tuner using a mustang dyno. But I really think 91 is what's killin us. wen we go FI on my girls FRS we will be going to e-85. Here is a pic of of the frs dyno with a cat back muffler and intake VS intake, boral headers, up pipe, front pipe, catback with tune. http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7288/8...20ed3653_h.jpg Here is a pic of the dyno from my other tuner same vs same http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2817/9...435ff62e_h.jpg Also I noticed you still have stock over pipe and front pipe. Changing them out may help as well. |
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 |
Update: Got a new map from Visconti early this morning. He wanted a pull on map 1 and 2. I drove around for a bit and got a couple pulls in on map 1, it no longer had hesitation going into boost, but was still much leaner than I'd like. Cold starting was completely resolved as well. On the previous maps the car would stall out unless you gave it constant throttle for 30 seconds.
Now the bad news...switched to map 2. I tried going into boost a couple times and noticed my AEM failsafe didn't show any AF/R readings, as if it was outside of the 10-18 range it can read. Ok..headed home to review logs. Driving on local road, 25ish mph..heard a loud POP sound. Sounded really bad. Car drove the remaining 1/4 mile home and parked the car. Waiting to hear back from John to see if there's anything horrific in the logs. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Well I hope all goes well for you. Ill try to follow you the best I can. am not sure what fi kit we are going with. But full blown was one we were leaning to. And works is where we are going to have it tuned and likely installed. I kinda like his prototype kit as well. I just wish the flex fuel kit did not cost so much.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Why did you put it on a dyno if you didn't feel it was running right?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
afr logging
Quote:
http://emopride.net/squirrels/aem-fb1.png And here's the most recent map from Visconti. http://emopride.net/squirrels/aem-pull2.png Both of these are quick pulls stopping at 5k revs. Now that I know how to use aemdata I can probably scale these better for future logs. |
Neither of those AFR curves look all that great, but I like seeing other people using the useful data that the AEM Failsafe provides.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.