Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Software Tuning (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=88)
-   -   Can someone take a look of my datalog (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=108247)

sIowbrz 07-11-2016 07:07 PM

Can someone take a look of my datalog
 
Can someome please take a look at my datalog i want to make sure its running safe and nothing damage the engine thank you and appreciate!http://www.datazap.me/u/carewyip/log...29?log=0&data=

Nah 07-11-2016 08:18 PM

youve got a little bit of knock your IAM dropped when you floored it outta nowhere. Log RPM next time. I'd say decrease your timing there a degree or two nothing major. good logs fuel trims look decent.

randomthoughts 07-11-2016 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sIowbrz (Post 2702351)
Can someome please take a look at my datalog i want to make sure its running safe and nothing damage the engine thank you and appreciate!http://www.datazap.me/u/carewyip/log...29?log=0&data=

What fuel are you using? Did u end up using ultra 94?
Your IAM dropped to .88 then back to .9. If I'm not mistaken it should stay at 1. Flkc hit 2.9.

Some one more knowledge might crime in but if you are running 91 you might want to consider 93 or ultra 94

sIowbrz 07-11-2016 09:30 PM

Im running 93 esso i dont run 91 unless theres no 93 or 94 available

phrosty 07-11-2016 10:23 PM

Yea, you've got some knock up high. Your engine is probably safe but you're losing power. I'd try different gas (Shell, etc.) -- go to a place that gets lots of customers so their gas is fresh. If it doesn't go away with different gas, you can tune it out.

Log RPM next time. Remove KC Learned if you're out of logging parameters.

FRSBRZGT86FAN 07-11-2016 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randomthoughts (Post 2702419)
What fuel are you using? Did u end up using ultra 94?
Your IAM dropped to .88 then back to .9. If I'm not mistaken it should stay at 1. Flkc hit 2.9.

Some one more knowledge might crime in but if you are running 91 you might want to consider 93 or ultra 94


That's correct IAM should for the most part always be at 1 unless theres bad quality fuels

sIowbrz 07-12-2016 06:50 PM

this is another log i did today can someone take a look and let me know? im using stage1 91oct tune with 93oct gas thanks!
http://www.datazap.me/u/carewyip/log...1-12-14&solo=2

sIowbrz 07-12-2016 06:53 PM

my IAM dropped to 0.36 for a second twice what can cause that??

phrosty 07-13-2016 12:18 AM

answers will be no different for the new logs.

Kodename47 07-13-2016 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sIowbrz (Post 2703267)
my IAM dropped to 0.36 for a second twice what can cause that??

Faulty readings....

sIowbrz 07-13-2016 06:40 PM

this one looks better now?
http://www.datazap.me/u/carewyip/log...data=1-8-11-12

Kodename47 07-14-2016 03:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sIowbrz (Post 2704148)
this one looks better now?
Datalog....

Could do with taking out some timing over 5k or maybe make it a little richer.....

Here's a good view

bababooey 07-14-2016 09:29 AM

is taking out timing recommended due to the 3.5 flkc reading? (from log above)

i ask because i am still trying learn what the readings mean in relation to my tune (latest link below)

http://www.datazap.me/u/n8brz/log-14...=0&data=1-5-13

also @ the 11.3 afr reading, is running too rich or too lean? thanks

Roadcone 07-14-2016 09:39 AM

that last log, commanded vs actual AFR... thats WAYYYY off.

commanded 12:1
actual 11.25:1

yet lt and st fuel trims are at 0... that makes ZERO sense.

D_Thissen 07-14-2016 10:11 AM

How many KM are on the tune?

D_Thissen 07-14-2016 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcone (Post 2704501)
that last log, commanded vs actual AFR... thats WAYYYY off.

commanded 12:1
actual 11.25:1

yet lt and st fuel trims are at 0... that makes ZERO sense.

At least he is on the richer side :iono:

sIowbrz 07-14-2016 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_Thissen (Post 2704521)
How many KM are on the tune?

I HAD ABOUT 100KM ON THE TUNE

sIowbrz 07-14-2016 10:51 AM

i dont plan to get it tune until i get the header but ill be taking it to the track want to make sure that im not damaging anything haha

D_Thissen 07-14-2016 11:31 AM

1000km is more than enough for the car to 'learn' the new tune. I haven't had a chance to look through your logs, but if your IAM is <1.0 on the street, it more than likely will drop further on the track as your Oil/Coolant Temps rise. You could always give PC94 a shot. I had good luck using that when I was on the Stg.1 93 tune.

Kodename47 07-14-2016 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcone (Post 2704501)
commanded 12:1
actual 11.25:1

yet lt and st fuel trims are at 0... that makes ZERO sense.

How does that make no sense?

sIowbrz 07-14-2016 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_Thissen (Post 2704590)
1000km is more than enough for the car to 'learn' the new tune. I haven't had a chance to look through your logs, but if your IAM is <1.0 on the street, it more than likely will drop further on the track as your Oil/Coolant Temps rise. You could always give PC94 a shot. I had good luck using that when I was on the Stg.1 93 tune.

sorry its 100 km not 1000 km lol

bababooey 07-14-2016 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcone (Post 2704501)
that last log, commanded vs actual AFR... thats WAYYYY off.

commanded 12:1
actual 11.25:1

yet lt and st fuel trims are at 0... that makes ZERO sense.

apologies if I created confusion concerning who's log that reply was towards. this thread seems to be a little more lower level conversation than the sticky I originally posted that in.

still trying to learn which values are critical for a healthy engine. if the KM question was to me, i had to of put much more than 200 miles on since this reflash. prior to that was another 93 tune that was too agressive so the relearn of ecu from switching fuels isnt a possibility.

steve99 07-14-2016 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bababooey (Post 2704869)
apologies if I created confusion concerning who's log that reply was towards. this thread seems to be a little more lower level conversation than the sticky I originally posted that in.

still trying to learn which values are critical for a healthy engine. if the KM question was to me, i had to of put much more than 200 miles on since this reflash. prior to that was another 93 tune that was too agressive so the relearn of ecu from switching fuels isnt a possibility.

couloured link below on ECU logging might help

steve99 07-14-2016 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcone (Post 2704501)
that last log, commanded vs actual AFR... thats WAYYYY off.

commanded 12:1
actual 11.25:1

yet lt and st fuel trims are at 0... that makes ZERO sense.

If ltft is low then that usually means the closed loop portion of maf scale is good ie kind of the lower rpm and light throttle portion, section below 3v maf.

if the commanded and actual afr follow each other well in wide open throttle areas means open loop area of maf scale is good ie sextion over 3v maf


in this case it appears the closed loop is ok but the open loop section of maf scale is not correct hence his ltft is low but car runs rich during wide open throttle runs


11.2 is the rich limit of standard 02 sensor scaling so it might be even richer.

fix would be to reduce the values in the open loop area af maf scale be the percent difference in the afr and commanded afr in this case about 8%. Their is a nice maf scaling tool that will do the work for you.

sIowbrz 07-14-2016 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve99 (Post 2705012)
If ltft is low then that usually means the closed loop portion of maf scale is good ie kind of the lower rpm and light throttle portion, section below 3v maf.

if the commanded and actual afr follow each other well in wide open throttle areas means open loop area of maf scale is good ie sextion over 3v maf


in this case it appears the closed loop is ok but the open loop section of maf scale is not correct hence his ltft is low but car runs rich during wide open throttle runs


11.2 is the rich limit of standard 02 sensor scaling so it might be even richer.

fix would be to reduce the values in the open loop area af maf scale be the percent difference in the afr and commanded afr in this case about 8%. Their is a nice maf scaling tool that will do the work for you.

I have no idea how to do it would you able to help a noobie out? Haha


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.