Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 122823)

For reference. :D
[u2b]S-BGIcRBPHM[/u2b]

Originally Posted by TylerLieberman (Post 122837)

^^lol stupid argument.

The guy in favor of functionality definitely has him beat on this argument. The other one is talking about shitty ways of achieving the hellaflush status. Cut springs, rotas etc. That is the lame way to do it. Having a hellaflush car on coilovers, links, Volks and have it done properly is much better and can still be a functional car-granted, not as much so as one setup in other peoples' methods

Just different types of styles and we all have different tastes. I prefer this style...just not the way this animation above portrays

Originally Posted by LSxJunkie (Post 122858)

Then stop trying to tout the performance "benefits" of stretched tires. You're spreading bad knowledge. We get it, you like the look. Honestly, I like a lot of cars with mild tuck. Mostly VIP cars. However, don't try to legitimize it by denying that you're compromising performance for it.

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 122879)

What the heck does rota wheels have to do with hellaflush junk?

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 122879)

What the heck does rota wheels have to do with hellaflush junk?

Originally Posted by TylerLieberman (Post 122910)

In refrence to the animation. The comment about the sportmax wheels and cut springs. I said Rota cause they're just as bad, if not, worse.

Originally Posted by TylerLieberman (Post 122910)

In refrence to the animation. The comment about the sportmax wheels and cut springs. I said Rota cause they're just as bad, if not, worse.

Originally Posted by Mr.Jay (Post 122925)

Apparently Rota make your hellaflush setup cheap and shitty where if you spend half your car budget on Volks then you are doing it right?

Damn I should of refreshed the page before I replied

Originally Posted by RRnold (Post 123113)

Back on topic! Yes hellaflush can be done RIGHT! :D:D:D

Originally Posted by RRnold (Post 123113)

I guess this is rice on this forum... ah shucks! :bonk:

Originally Posted by RRnold (Post 123113)

Back on topic! Yes hellaflush can be done RIGHT! :D:D:D

I guess this is rice on this forum... ah shucks! :bonk:

Originally Posted by Kunzite (Post 123274)

I guess even a terribly wrong things can be done "right" (i.e. to succeed in breaking a perfectly working car).
But to make a terribly wrong thing right, I'd guess you'll have to do like those folks:

Originally Posted by old greg (Post 123289)

I can't speak for anyone else but to me, yeah, it is. The wheels/alignment/ride height of any of those cars looks as stupid and "trendy" to me as a massive wing and neons on an EK civic.

To each his own.

Originally Posted by 86'd (Post 123376)

I guess:

1. It looks too much like the Mini-truck, low riders, I grew up with in SoCal which I never cared for.

2. I'm already 30, starting a family, and I don't want to look like a "cool" 18 year old. I want to look like an adult.

3. It looks to be impractical as hell.

4. The question of, can it be done right is mute. I'm sure 70% of people lowering their cars either cut the springs anyway or put them over blown shocks, so I'm sure people who go the "extra mile" and are into the "hellaflush" scene are ricers by default. I'm sure they don't bother to set a correct camber and toe and just cruise around wondering why their tires are always bald. The ones that "do it right" are probably .0001% and I could care less what that percentage does.

All I want is a clean drop to get rid of most of the wheel well, doesn't scrape, and retains most of a car's handling characteristics.

Anything more than that is just an attempt to fit in to a sub-subculture, to make as a hobby, and to try to stand out. Those sorts of behaviors are again, relegated to people under the age of 25.

And that's fine, but it certainly isn't for me.

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 123401)

I'm not sure what I'd call those, but they are fugly for sure IMO. If I ever do that to my car I give everyone here permission to shoot me in the head.

Originally Posted by old greg (Post 123289)

I can't speak for anyone else but to me, yeah, it is. The wheels/alignment/ride height of any of those cars looks as stupid and "trendy" to me as a massive wing and neons on an EK civic.

To each his own.

Originally Posted by Dave-ROR (Post 123401)

I'm not sure what I'd call those, but they are fugly for sure IMO. If I ever do that to my car I give everyone here permission to shoot me in the head.

Originally Posted by coyote (Post 123425)

Is there a way I can only see posts by these two gentlemen on this forum?

Originally Posted by coyote (Post 123442)

Damn right.

The only thing that might stop me from buying this car is the perceived association with the hellaflush dorifto fad.

I fear these cars will become the ricer's vehicle of choice.

Originally Posted by RRnold (Post 123416)

I guess I'm the minority here. I wouldn't slam my FR-S and put 18x11's like the whole stance scene but I think some of them look cool. My driveway is way too steep for something like that but I do plan to lower it.

The "frog look" (the term it was called when I hang out up in the Bay Area as a kid) has been here since the 80's and it's more common now that rebarrelling is available, a machine to roll the fenders evenly, more available offsets etc.

To me, I like all cars when they are done right; ol skool imports, 90's imports, ol skool classic Chevy's especially a '66 Nova! Not all of the hellaflush run cut springs and most of them run coilovers and air ride suspension.

http://image.chevyhiperformance.com/...chevy_nova.jpg

Originally Posted by RWDJunkie (Post 123649)

Pretty much the same for me. I've never done it and probably won't ever slam any car of mine because it's not my thing when it comes to application. I do like seeing it from time to time though. But "done right" is subjective to individual tastes of course.


[u2b]F13djcRXTSM[/u2b]

For example: the Looking AE86 you posted is a track drifted car (check the video and see he still has room for suspension travel), so I'm not bothered by the fitment or stance. In fact, most of those old school rides look fine to me. But I think that purple Odyssey looks like absolute crap. And while the camber isn't terrible, the WRX gets no love since I don't like the idea of slamming AWD cars.

Again, it comes down to individual taste.

Originally Posted by coyote (Post 123425)

Is there a way I can only see posts by these two gentlemen on this forum?

Originally Posted by Giccin (Post 121557)

With my speeding habits. I personally don't think hellaflush can ever be done right. :P

Scrappppppeeeeeee.

Originally Posted by catharsis (Post 124355)

Hellaflush can never be done "right" As in functional. It's a stupid trend, that like underglows will become "rice" in a few years. Sadly I think this car will be the go to car for hellaflushers in a few years. Kind like 350z's are now.

Originally Posted by TylerLieberman (Post 124565)

Except Zs are lame as hell :D

Originally Posted by switchlanez (Post 126141)

ze fitted look + pimpish video editing

[u2b]4BlTCWCodyQ[/u2b]

Originally Posted by LSxJunkie (Post 126966)

There's a 60 page long thread on my350z dedicated to fat tires and no stretch.

http://my350z.com/forum/wheels-and-t...es-thread.html

First picture.

http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/g...g?t=1245418036

Most recent picture.

http://i417.photobucket.com/albums/p...11073797_n.jpg

Originally Posted by Maxim (Post 127490)

It's got the "word" hella in it. Enough said....