follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting

Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting What these cars were built for!


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2014, 01:03 PM   #1
JustDoItMikey
Member
 
JustDoItMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: Georgia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
NASA TT - Lets talk about spending points!

This thread is for discussion of NASA Time Trial builds and how to spend the points for the best track times. There are countless ways to spend your points (please refer to http://www.nasaproracing.com/rules/t...sification.pdf for a list of the mods and points assigned them, and http://www.nasaproracing.com/rules/time_trial_rules.pdf for full TT rules) so lets bounce some ideas off each other and share experiences of what does and doesn't work.


I plan to build a car that will stay within the base TTD class. Please note I am no expert on the points system and if I am adding all of this up incorrectly please point out any discrepancies. I feel that power mods, fairly stock weight, and sticky tires will yield the best times personally so my currently planned build is as follows:

A - Tires
Toyo RR or lower for a max +9 points
Running a 235 vs the class max 245 is -1 point

C - Engine
Adding a CAI +1
Aftermarket header +2
Aftermarket exhaust +2
Upgraded cats +1
Reflash to clean up that torque curve +0

E - Suspension
Coilovers, aftermarket dampers and springs +3 & +2
Camber plates +0


I know there is a forum member in AZ with this basic setup doing very well, and it was pretty much the exact setup I was planning to try before we met. So anyway chime in with your NASA TT setup, or discussion on if spending points on A is better than B, etc.
__________________
JustDoItMikey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JustDoItMikey For This Useful Post:
ja1217 (09-09-2014)
Old 09-09-2014, 01:39 PM   #2
phastafrican
Senior Member
 
phastafrican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Raven Scion FR-S
Location: Fernandina Beach, FL
Posts: 437
Thanks: 118
Thanked 171 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Hal in AZ is running a different set up now He has an E85 tune and dyno'd 194hp.
225 A6 +9,
Muffler delete +2
RCE TII +5
3pts for weight.
__________________
Emmanuel Baako: NASA-Southeast Race Control & NASA Florida Race Director
RaceCar:2013 Scion FR-S #986 NASA PTD || Tow:2011 Dodge Durango R/T
phastafrican is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 01:41 PM   #3
ja1217
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2004 Toyota RAV-4 5M
Location: MD
Posts: 297
Thanks: 13
Thanked 155 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
So here's my current set up. I'm usually pretty competitive, but it always depends on who shows up. My last event I came in 2nd (Summit Point Main) but was 2 seconds off the pace (dang E36's, guy set the track record), but the previous event I won at VIR.

Current Total: 16 points

Tires (6 Total):
Hoosier R6: +10
225/45R17: -4

Suspension (8 Total):
Ohlins Road&Track: +8 (Shaft > 40mm = +5, inverted front struts = +1, aftermarket springs = +2)

Brakes (2 Total):
Essex AP Racing Sprint BBK: +2

Free Mods (0 points):
DSS CF Drive shaft
ACT Prolite clutch/flywheel
Perrin Engine Mounts
Shorai 5lbs. battery

Competition Weight: 2885 (need to have at least 1/3 tank of gas and I am carrying 70lbs. of ballast in the spare tire well)
WHP (Dynojet): 185

Next year I plan on adding more power by getting a header and high flow cat downpipe (or where ever that 2nd cat is) and I'll probably move to Maxxis RC-1's for there very generous contingency plans. It's probably still not a completely optimal setup, but I did a fair amount of stuff before even considering doing TT.


Theoretical Fastest Build (19 points total):

Tires (9 points):
225/40R17 Hoosier A6: 9 points (although with the A6 being replaced with the A7, which will be a higher point cost, currently its at 22!!!)

Suspension (5 points):
Aftermarket shocks/dampers: +3
Aftermarket springs: +2

Engine (5 points):
Header: +2
Exhaust: +2
Cats: +1

Then you throw in as many free mods (bushings, etc) as you can and run right at the power/weight limit for the class.

Also, as a side note, all aftermarket headers for the FR-S/BRZ will cost 5 points. The definition of a header, according to the rules, is just the primaries. Since all aftermarket headers I've seen for our car include primaries, remove/upgrade the cat, and will modify piping going to/from that cat they are seen as 5 point modifications. See http://nasaforums.com/viewtopic.php?...119352#p467349
ja1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 01:44 PM   #4
JustDoItMikey
Member
 
JustDoItMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: Georgia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phastafrican View Post
Hal in AZ is running a different set up now He has an E85 tune and dyno'd 194hp.
225 A6 +9,
Muffler delete +2
RCE TII +5
3pts for weight.
Ya we spent lots of time with Hal at nationals and asked him alllllll sorts of questions. Great guy, so far all the 86 guys we have met have been great... I think that basic combo is the way for us to go though, get power and torque up to max, sticky tires, and suspension stuff. But if we get hit with a 7 point penalty for 2015 its really going to change things and we are more looking at tires and suspension and thats all....
__________________
JustDoItMikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 01:50 PM   #5
JustDoItMikey
Member
 
JustDoItMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: Georgia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ja1217 View Post
So here's my current set up. I'm usually pretty competitive, but it always depends on who shows up. My last event I came in 2nd (Summit Point Main) but was 2 seconds off the pace (dang E36's, guy set the track record), but the previous event I won at VIR.

Current Total: 16 points

Tires (6 Total):
Hoosier R6: +10
225/45R17: -4

Suspension (8 Total):
Ohlins Road&Track: +8 (Shaft > 40mm = +5, inverted front struts = +1, aftermarket springs = +2)

Brakes (2 Total):
Essex AP Racing Sprint BBK: +2

Free Mods (0 points):
DSS CF Drive shaft
ACT Prolite clutch/flywheel
Perrin Engine Mounts
Shorai 5lbs. battery

Competition Weight: 2885 (need to have at least 1/3 tank of gas and I am carrying 70lbs. of ballast in the spare tire well)
WHP (Dynojet): 185

Next year I plan on adding more power by getting a header and high flow cat downpipe (or where ever that 2nd cat is) and I'll probably move to Maxxis RC-1's for there very generous contingency plans. It's probably still not a completely optimal setup, but I did a fair amount of stuff before even considering doing TT.


Theoretical Fastest Build (19 points total):

Tires (9 points):
225/40R17 Hoosier A6: 9 points (although with the A6 being replaced with the A7, which will be a higher point cost, currently its at 22!!!)

Suspension (5 points):
Aftermarket shocks/dampers: +3
Aftermarket springs: +2

Engine (5 points):
Header: +2
Exhaust: +2
Cats: +1

Then you throw in as many free mods (bushings, etc) as you can and run right at the power/weight limit for the class.

Also, as a side note, all aftermarket headers for the FR-S/BRZ will cost 5 points. The definition of a header, according to the rules, is just the primaries. Since all aftermarket headers I've seen for our car include primaries, remove/upgrade the cat, and will modify piping going to/from that cat they are seen as 5 point modifications. See http://nasaforums.com/viewtopic.php?...119352#p467349

I assume you are tuned? Are you just tuned on pump 93 or 91? I guess I need to do more research on tuning the stock car as I thought we couldn't make much more power and eliminate the torque dip without headers and exhaust. If we can thats awesome, will be doing that asap. And it looks like we both came up with the same solution for what should be the fastest car given the points. I guess only hard track time will tell now. But gotta do that tuning research, maybe I can get tuned before Road Atl in December.
__________________
JustDoItMikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 01:55 PM   #6
phastafrican
Senior Member
 
phastafrican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Raven Scion FR-S
Location: Fernandina Beach, FL
Posts: 437
Thanks: 118
Thanked 171 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
The torque dip won't be eliminated... But you can tune to max hp allowed in class on E85. To get to max hp on 93, you'll need the 5pts for headers/cats/exhaust.
Keep in mind, any tune needs to have a margin of variance. So even though 199 is what gets max, you probably don't want to give some room up top, or have the option to add weight in some way, either ballast or fuel. A DQ for cheating is worse than a 2nd place for being a few hp under.
__________________
Emmanuel Baako: NASA-Southeast Race Control & NASA Florida Race Director
RaceCar:2013 Scion FR-S #986 NASA PTD || Tow:2011 Dodge Durango R/T
phastafrican is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 02:00 PM   #7
ja1217
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2004 Toyota RAV-4 5M
Location: MD
Posts: 297
Thanks: 13
Thanked 155 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustDoItMikey View Post
But if we get hit with a 7 point penalty for 2015 its really going to change things and we are more looking at tires and suspension and thats all....
Has that been discussed at all? If so, I haven't seen it. I was actually going to see if I couldn't argue getting our base competition weight back to 2775 since the only FR-S at Nationals East was 3 seconds (I think) off the pace of 2 E36's, both of whom I will be battling at VIR in October.
ja1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 02:01 PM   #8
ja1217
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2004 Toyota RAV-4 5M
Location: MD
Posts: 297
Thanks: 13
Thanked 155 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustDoItMikey View Post
I assume you are tuned? Are you just tuned on pump 93 or 91? I guess I need to do more research on tuning the stock car as I thought we couldn't make much more power and eliminate the torque dip without headers and exhaust. If we can thats awesome, will be doing that asap. And it looks like we both came up with the same solution for what should be the fastest car given the points. I guess only hard track time will tell now. But gotta do that tuning research, maybe I can get tuned before Road Atl in December.
I got a Delicious Tune that netted me about 8whp up top. I am running on 93 octane gas and the only engine mod I currently have is a K&N drop in filter.

Last edited by ja1217; 09-09-2014 at 02:12 PM.
ja1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ja1217 For This Useful Post:
JustDoItMikey (09-09-2014)
Old 09-09-2014, 02:04 PM   #9
JustDoItMikey
Member
 
JustDoItMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: Georgia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phastafrican View Post
The torque dip won't be eliminated... But you can tune to max hp allowed in class on E85. To get to max hp on 93, you'll need the 5pts for headers/cats/exhaust.
Keep in mind, any tune needs to have a margin of variance. So even though 199 is what gets max, you probably don't want to give some room up top, or have the option to add weight in some way, either ballast or fuel. A DQ for cheating is worse than a 2nd place for being a few hp under.

Oh ya I saw too many DQ's at Nationals, do not want. But I dont think E85 is a realistic option for me at this point as much as I want it to be. So I am looking to stay within the confines of 93, at least until I can figure out a way to make E85 possible. So that means all I am going to do that are points related, at least until I know the 2015 points system, is tires, coilovers and a tune. Hey thats less money I have to scrounge up!
__________________
JustDoItMikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 02:04 PM   #10
ja1217
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2004 Toyota RAV-4 5M
Location: MD
Posts: 297
Thanks: 13
Thanked 155 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phastafrican View Post
The torque dip won't be eliminated... But you can tune to max hp allowed in class on E85. To get to max hp on 93, you'll need the 5pts for headers/cats/exhaust.
Keep in mind, any tune needs to have a margin of variance. So even though 199 is what gets max, you probably don't want to give some room up top, or have the option to add weight in some way, either ballast or fuel. A DQ for cheating is worse than a 2nd place for being a few hp under.
Getting an E85 tune is a nice way to get to the max hp/weight limit and save 5 points, but I don't like having to carry around cans of E85. I don't have a trailer and my car is already full of tires, tools, and camping equipment when I go to an event.
ja1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 02:05 PM   #11
JustDoItMikey
Member
 
JustDoItMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: Georgia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ja1217 View Post
I got a Delicious Tune that netted me about 8whp up top. I am running on 93 octane gas and the only engine mode I currently have is a K&N drop in filter.
Did that help out the torque dip a good bit?
__________________
JustDoItMikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 02:08 PM   #12
ja1217
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2004 Toyota RAV-4 5M
Location: MD
Posts: 297
Thanks: 13
Thanked 155 Times in 102 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustDoItMikey View Post
Did that help out the torque dip a good bit?


Blue line was before the tune. So yes, it did help a bit, but I don't spend a whole lot of time in that RPM range on the track anyway.
ja1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ja1217 For This Useful Post:
JustDoItMikey (09-09-2014)
Old 09-09-2014, 02:15 PM   #13
JustDoItMikey
Member
 
JustDoItMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: Georgia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 9
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ja1217 View Post
Blue line was before the tune. So yes, it did help a bit, but I don't spend a whole lot of time in that RPM range on the track anyway.
Well it looks like it at least made it climb back out faster, better than not tuning either way I suppose. We just need more E85 available at the track so we dont have to byoE85
__________________
JustDoItMikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 02:28 PM   #14
phastafrican
Senior Member
 
phastafrican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Raven Scion FR-S
Location: Fernandina Beach, FL
Posts: 437
Thanks: 118
Thanked 171 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ja1217 View Post
Has that been discussed at all? If so, I haven't seen it. I was actually going to see if I couldn't argue getting our base competition weight back to 2775 since the only FR-S at Nationals East was 3 seconds (I think) off the pace of 2 E36's, both of whom I will be battling at VIR in October.
I'm privy to inside info. I argued a ton against going up a * this year and collected data from 19 different dyno sheets, etc. What we posted on the forums at the beginning of the year was only half of it. The FR-S will do 1.42s at RA, but that's still 4 secs behind Eric in his TTD miata which will do 1.38s.
There's no way to win that battle. The FR-S is 2 secs faster at Roebling so it's a trade off. These 2 tracks are heavily biased to one side or the other.

VIR next year will suck... long straights will favor the high HP. Might need to build for TTC if you want to win - Hal and I are both considering it. I have more PTD racers than PTC racers so right now, I'm not motivated to do it, plus would rather spend the money on sticker R7s and modifications to my trailer to transport 2 additional sets of tires and 4 fuel jugs.
__________________
Emmanuel Baako: NASA-Southeast Race Control & NASA Florida Race Director
RaceCar:2013 Scion FR-S #986 NASA PTD || Tow:2011 Dodge Durango R/T
phastafrican is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lets talk lug nuts Ibanezboy21 Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 22 06-23-2014 03:42 PM
Lets talk tires... frs10 Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 34 10-04-2013 05:21 AM
Lets talk about clutches charged86 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 26 08-30-2013 04:13 PM
Lets talk exclusivity whitejdm BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 33 02-15-2012 01:17 PM
Lets talk weight KaliKev Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 63 09-12-2011 12:05 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.