|
Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] For all off-topic discussion topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-10-2019, 02:03 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: NPR, Florida
Posts: 2,404
Thanks: 1,802
Thanked 2,903 Times in 1,282 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Any plumbers in here?
So it's the plumbing phase on my research now. I am limited in space 160 sq ft. I have narrowed it down to these two for hot water heaters:
Tankless/3.7GPM/Size: 17.5"x13.5"x5.5"/Warranty: 7 years against leakage and 2 years parts https://www.homedepot.com/p/ATMOR-Th...18TP/300164325 Stainless Steel Tanked/Size: 19.5"x19.5"x29"/Warranty: 10 year against leakage and 6 year on parts https://www.homedepot.com/p/Westingh...0N10/305554770 This is a shower/sink for bathroom, sink in kitchen and a hookup for washer. With a low flow for the shower, sink running and even doing the laundry all at the same time, that tankless will keep up. The 20 gallon should be OK too with no marathon showers happening. So does it just come down to the size and warranty? Is there any reason not to go tankless? Several people have said parts are harder to get for tankless and in a pinch a tankless part(most likely heat element) is just a quick stop at a home improvement store. I also see the tanked one has a Uniform Energy Factor of .92 which is high. All the tankless one says is "Save up to 50% on electric bills compared to a traditional tank water heater". I have allotted for the tanked one to fit in there fine but the tankless one gives me a lot of extra space to work with. So which way to go? Also just found this: https://www.rinnai.us/faq/tankless-w...s-water-heater According to that if initial costs are the same and they are for the ones I chose, the tankless is definitely better. The warranty doesn't indicate that though. It even says in that site that the tankless will outlast the tanked one "almost twice as long in some cases". Last edited by Impureclient; 08-10-2019 at 02:17 AM. |
08-10-2019, 04:05 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,914
Thanks: 28,861
Thanked 31,900 Times in 16,458 Posts
Mentioned: 709 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I'd go with the lightest, most space saving one.
humfrz |
08-10-2019, 04:08 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Drives: 2017 BRZ PP , 2005 Saab 97X
Location: CA
Posts: 1,052
Thanks: 754
Thanked 721 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Id for for the one easiest to get repair parts for and work on with lower expense over time
am not a plumber though, just a janitor |
08-10-2019, 06:00 PM | #4 | |
ProCrastinationConsultant
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: '14 Ranger, '18 Tacoma 4Dr LB
Location: chicago-ish
Posts: 11,330
Thanks: 35,240
Thanked 13,673 Times in 6,781 Posts
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
i've got nothing to really add, i just found this humorous.
Quote:
if i didn't know better, these companies are starting to make building a house sound like rocket surgery!
__________________
"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time"
|
|
08-10-2019, 07:34 PM | #5 |
[insert cool phrase here]
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: BRZ Premium
Location: Central Coast CA
Posts: 2,369
Thanks: 709
Thanked 1,558 Times in 930 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Well I'm no plumber but I did replace my water heater not too long aso.
I was looking at a tankless unit but the amount to get the electrican to wire up was more than what I thought I would save. I just ended up getting a bigger traditional water heater. Super simple to install even played with copper tubbing soldering. Only problem I encountered was removing the old unit. Cause it still had water in it. So that's something to think about the extra cost with a tank less water heater. Unless you got an electrician buddy.
__________________
New daily driver - Subaru BRZ Premium
Weekend fun/track car - '91 MR2 Turbo Gen3 Old daily driver - '88 MR2 Supercharged |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr.ac For This Useful Post: | DarkPira7e (08-11-2019) |
08-10-2019, 07:49 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,914
Thanks: 28,861
Thanked 31,900 Times in 16,458 Posts
Mentioned: 709 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Your welcome. humfrz |
|
08-10-2019, 07:54 PM | #7 |
Dismember
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,558
Thanks: 2,152
Thanked 3,999 Times in 2,155 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
3.7gpm for 160 sq feet? LOL! 2.5 GPM is PLENTY.
https://www.amazon.com/Ecosmart-ECO-...64&s=hi&sr=1-1 I've installed a tankless propane. I went with Rinnai because it was recommended.
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to EAGLE5 For This Useful Post: | Dadhawk (08-11-2019) |
08-10-2019, 10:24 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: NPR, Florida
Posts: 2,404
Thanks: 1,802
Thanked 2,903 Times in 1,282 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Thanks for the responses. I like that Ecosmart brand one that @jsimon7777 found there. The Ecosmart ECO 18 looks like it would be OK in my current climate zone doing up to 3.2 gpm but,
in two zones up and most likely where this might end up it gets 2.6gpm. That still looks good and it has a lifetime warranty which is even better than the two I originally looked into. If it was staying in FL then I'd probably drop to the EcoSmart ECO 11 but I want to be safe rather than sorry. At two zones up the ECO 11 only is putting out 1.9 gpm while a regular shower head uses 2.1. I'd have to use a low flow on there to bring it back to 1.5pgm but even then, if that low flow shower is being used and somebody uses a faucet, it's struggling. So, ECO 18 it is. Thanks to all the Marios and Luigis! |
08-10-2019, 10:48 PM | #9 |
Dismember
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,558
Thanks: 2,152
Thanked 3,999 Times in 2,155 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
In a tiny house, when one person uses the shower, the other doesn't use the sink.
__________________
|
08-11-2019, 02:41 AM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: NPR, Florida
Posts: 2,404
Thanks: 1,802
Thanked 2,903 Times in 1,282 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
With that ECO18 one, that should take care of two people simultaneously using the hot water even in a colder climate(N.C.) according to the flow and temperatures. At least based on this chart: |
|
08-11-2019, 12:55 PM | #11 |
Dismember
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,558
Thanks: 2,152
Thanked 3,999 Times in 2,155 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
house etiquette.
__________________
|
08-11-2019, 02:02 PM | #12 |
1st86 Driver!
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 19,822
Thanks: 38,847
Thanked 24,958 Times in 11,383 Posts
Mentioned: 182 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
|
We've had a tankless water heater in our house for over 20 years, and if we ever move the first thing I would do is switch the tank water heater for a tankless. It isn't about saving money for me, its about never-ending hot water.
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.
Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark. What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk". |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post: | Impureclient (08-11-2019) |
08-11-2019, 03:14 PM | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: NPR, Florida
Posts: 2,404
Thanks: 1,802
Thanked 2,903 Times in 1,282 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If it doesn't sell, at this point looking at other similar units for sale it easily should though, I also need one to put on the new land to live in while we build that house. I wanted it comfortable(unlike most small RVs) and efficient and so far I've kept costs to build it minimal. For my own house I build I am definitely going tankless. I'd change my current house out to tankless but I just changed it out to a regular tanked about 6 months ago. Since I've made a couple of these posts about building this one I'm currently doing I haven't put too much thought into exactly what it should sell for. I'd be curious what people in here say is a reasonable amount these should go for. When I get toward the end I will put up all info and see what people say but it would be nice now to know since as I go that can determine how fancy I get with the countertops/cabinets/flooring/fixtures/lighting/etc. I pretty much am building to follow all to code as if it were a new home. That means making it fireproof for a forest fire prone area, hurricane rated for in South Florida, able to take about 3 feet of flood water untouched inside(in it's closed/protected state it will be like almost like a boat) and also thermally efficient for both this hot climate and also a colder one. Pretty much making this thing a tiny fire,wind and water proof beast. Inside will be close to 155 sqft. For now plans 1 bedroom/1 full bathroom/kitchenette w/eating area and living room. Solid stone countertops in bath and kitchen, decent fixtures and lighting, lifetime laminate floors, R-values at current new build standard, lots of storage in form of closets/cabinets/cubby holes, room for one Full bed or two Twin in the bedroom. There is plenty of room for desktop computer and/or several laptop capable places but we might make a bed that that can be raised away to conceal a full desk area. This way the bedroom can be transformed into a office if this is used by a building contractor. They usually just get one of these with a bathroom/kitchenette on the building site but this is a fully functioning movable home and for not much more than those stripped out units. There is of course room for a massive TV(70" if the plan stays it's current way as it keeps evolving as we build). It would be able to sleep up to four easily with using a futon instead of regular love seat also. A family of four could use this as a small getaway unit instead of a hotel/cabin/campsite. If bunkbeds are used in the bedroom, sleeping a total of six could actually be done. Still enough room for 6 people to even sit and have a place to eat too. So with that said if anybody in here could give me a estimate on what it should go(what they would pay for something similar) for I'd greatly appreciate that. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Impureclient For This Useful Post: | Dadhawk (08-12-2019) |
|
|