follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine Swaps

Engine Swaps Discussion of engine swaps.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-24-2019, 01:29 PM   #99
Ashikabi
Senior Member
 
Ashikabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Northwest Iowa
Posts: 7,354
Thanks: 454
Thanked 4,542 Times in 2,947 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
Maybe Clash0901 just read the title of the video and assumed "all motor k24 on pump e85" meant stock k24 on pump gas or on e85, in which case, he was right in his statements. He probably wasn't thinking this was a built motor with 16:1 compression, high flow head, ITB's or any other crazy configuration.



I posted the same link earlier in this thread, just fwi. That article shows a build that costs $10-15k+ for just the block and head. Add some titanium bits, dry sump, forged crank, etc and this engine is north of $20k. See below:



http://www.4pistonracing.com/k24-480...omplete-engine



Ashikabi and I weren't suggesting the K24 wasn't the better platform for power. Perhaps throwing $20k into the FA20 motor wouldn't produce the same results, but it sounds like all the guy was asking for is 220whp. Clearly a 2.4L stock K-series motor will outperform the FA20, but this swap kit seems silly considering the cost versus the goal power. All he really needs is motor mounts from Pure and some tid bits. He wouldn't need a custom wiring harness that integrates with a Motec system and the stock wiring system, so that all stock features are usable. That is all we were saying.


@Icecreamtruk ...How did you settle on the K24? Have you considered the 2JZGE motor? 225hp/220tq stock. Obviously reliable. Definitely upgradable. Too heavy?
Agreed. He mentioned weight a couple times so I'm sure that's why the 2jz and LS are out. I understand the desire for a drop in system but I kinda thought the necessary parts already existed. I get that he's waiting to blow his current motor up but really just selling it while functional would probably be more prudent.

I don't want to argue with anyone, just seemed like he's waiting for an "expensive" kit with a bunch of features he doesn't want when he can do the swap right now for maybe a couple grand on top of the motor. Taking the CAN electronics out of the picture makes this whole thing so simple
Ashikabi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ashikabi For This Useful Post:
Icecreamtruk (01-24-2019), Irace86.2.0 (01-24-2019)
Old 01-24-2019, 01:32 PM   #100
Icecreamtruk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Track preped NA FRS
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 987
Thanks: 1,056
Thanked 680 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
@Icecreamtruk ...How did you settle on the K24? Have you considered the 2JZGE motor? 225hp/220tq stock. Obviously reliable. Definitely upgradable. Too heavy?
Yes, weight is the main concern. Another thing, a k24 on the engine bay would free up a bunch of space. Why is space even a consideration? I have plans regarding aero that would be much more easily achieved if the motor wasnt as wide and far foward as the FA20 is.
Icecreamtruk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 01:33 PM   #101
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Exactly, he could do the swap now and cheaper if he wants or put that same money into the FA20 with some weight reduction mods and be in a similar situation.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 01:37 PM   #102
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icecreamtruk View Post
Yes, weight is the main concern. Another thing, a k24 on the engine bay would free up a bunch of space. Why is space even a consideration? I have plans regarding aero that would be much more easily achieved if the motor wasnt as wide and far foward as the FA20 is.
The K24 will be further back, but it looks to be the same distance forward, just fyi. The FA20 has the steering rack in the way, which is why it wasn't placed further back. The K24 has two extra cylinders, so I can't imagine it being too different in distance back. Maybe an inch or two difference. Maybe less. Perhaps Pure Auto can give us a measurement.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post:
Icecreamtruk (01-24-2019)
Old 01-24-2019, 01:38 PM   #103
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
The video I posted was not of the motor in this link...
I noticed that after posting and deleted the statement.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 01:46 PM   #104
Icecreamtruk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: Track preped NA FRS
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 987
Thanks: 1,056
Thanked 680 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
The K24 will be further back, but it looks to be the same distance forward, just fyi. The FA20 has the steering rack in the way, which is why it wasn't placed further back. The K24 has two extra cylinders, so I can't imagine it being too different in distance back. Maybe an inch or two difference. Maybe less. Perhaps Pure Auto can give us a measurement.
Yeah, the front looks about an inch or so clearer than with the fa20 (from pics at least). There will be big gains on the sides, so I should be able to work more easily with that.
Icecreamtruk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 01:55 PM   #105
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icecreamtruk View Post
Yeah, the front looks about an inch or so clearer than with the fa20 (from pics at least). There will be big gains on the sides, so I should be able to work more easily with that.
Just a comparison. Definitely seems like there is more room to work with. I would love to see handling comparisons between an inline four and the stock motor. If the car kept its characteristics then an inline swap could be in the future for me when the car is a track rat too. For now, I am happy with a boosted FA20.


__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post:
Icecreamtruk (01-24-2019), Teseo (01-24-2019)
Old 01-24-2019, 04:31 PM   #106
BertoFT
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 13 FRS Firestorm
Location: SC
Posts: 53
Thanks: 28
Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 View Post
Just a comparison. Definitely seems like there is more room to work with. I would love to see handling comparisons between an inline four and the stock motor. If the car kept its characteristics then an inline swap could be in the future for me when the car is a track rat too. For now, I am happy with a boosted FA20.





Coincidentally, I hydroplaned my boosted FRS into a ditch yesterday. It has now been promoted to project car.

Sent from my SM-G9600 using Tapatalk
BertoFT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 07:46 PM   #107
Pho20
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Colorado
Posts: 80
Thanks: 11
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashikabi View Post
Me and Vijay were just discussing this. It's likely you could use an aftermarket unit to control Cruise by itself
Very cool!

Pure automotive what level of integration are y’all shooting for same as your ls/2jz swaps?
Pho20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 08:13 AM   #108
spitfire481
Senior Member
 
spitfire481's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2JZ FRS
Location: Pure Automotive Performance
Posts: 1,378
Thanks: 97
Thanked 1,354 Times in 621 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pho20 View Post
Very cool!

Pure automotive what level of integration are y’all shooting for same as your ls/2jz swaps?
same as LS/2J. cluster, drive by wire, stock fuel pump controller, stock fan controller, abs, custom traction control, push button start, cruise control, etc.
__________________
Pure Automotive Performance
MoTeC
Build Thread
@spitfire481
spitfire481 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to spitfire481 For This Useful Post:
Draco_PR23 (01-25-2019), Icecreamtruk (01-25-2019), surfwaxsmitty (01-28-2019), Tokay444 (01-26-2019), venturaII (01-30-2019)
Old 01-30-2019, 10:15 AM   #109
ka-t_240
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 968
Thanks: 124
Thanked 327 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
What will the header, mounts, motec setup run?

I know it sounds like a shifter will be an issue, is the S2K trans further forward?

I know many KMiata guys are starting to use the BMW 5 speed, thoughts on using those in the 86?
ka-t_240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2019, 01:23 PM   #110
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,819
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ka-t_240 View Post
What will the header, mounts, motec setup run?

I know it sounds like a shifter will be an issue, is the S2K trans further forward?

I know many KMiata guys are starting to use the BMW 5 speed, thoughts on using those in the 86?
For those of us who plan to stay NA, I think having the option to purchase an adapter to keep the 86 transmission would be well worth it, compared to the headache of modifying the S2000 shifter, on top of the purchase price for that transmission, plus the need to use a different adapter anyways to connect the K motor and S2K trans... I get that the S2000 trans is stronger, but not everyone necessarily needs that in the first place.
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to venturaII For This Useful Post:
Icecreamtruk (01-31-2019)
Old 01-30-2019, 01:29 PM   #111
Ashikabi
Senior Member
 
Ashikabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Northwest Iowa
Posts: 7,354
Thanks: 454
Thanked 4,542 Times in 2,947 Posts
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturaII View Post
For those of us who plan to stay NA, I think having the option to purchase an adapter to keep the 86 transmission would be well worth it, compared to the headache of modifying the S2000 shifter, on top of the purchase price for that transmission, plus the need to use a different adapter anyways to connect the K motor and S2K trans... I get that the S2000 trans is stronger, but not everyone necessarily needs that in the first place.
This guy makes a good point. What all is involved in an adapter anyways? I'm not familiar with adapting transmissions. Probably some kind of bracket for the bolts and then something for the driveshaft?
Ashikabi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashikabi For This Useful Post:
Icecreamtruk (01-31-2019)
Old 01-30-2019, 01:43 PM   #112
venturaII
Only users lose drugs.
 
venturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Drives: All the time
Location: Shrewsbury upon Worcestershire
Posts: 1,819
Thanks: 874
Thanked 1,067 Times in 674 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashikabi View Post
This guy makes a good point. What all is involved in an adapter anyways? I'm not familiar with adapting transmissions. Probably some kind of bracket for the bolts and then something for the driveshaft?
Adapters are about allowing different engine and transmission bellhousing patterns connect to each other, plus setting input/pilot shaft depth correctly for the flywheel and clutch assembly used.

An adapter is already being used to connect the fwd K motor to the S2K transmission anyways, so the cost of the kit should theoretically be the same. Plus you'd be saving the actual cost of the S2K transmission, plus whatever shifter/console modification would be necessary. There would also be the chance of the 86 transmission actually staying in the same position in the car, further eliminating the need/cost for a custom driveshaft. That one I'm not sure of, but it'd be a nice perk if so..

For those of us whom this swap appeals to for the sake of losing weight and cleaning up the engine compartment, rather than being the basis for a high horsepower build, this would seem to be a much more attractive option.
__________________
"To know a thing well, know it's limits. Only when pushed beyond its tolerances will true nature be seen." Amtal Rule
venturaII is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to venturaII For This Useful Post:
Icecreamtruk (01-31-2019)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pure Auto's Swap Compilation Thread - 2JZ and LSX ! Pure Automotive Engine Swaps 29 01-10-2018 01:20 AM
SwapYour86.Com Pure Automotive 2JZGTE Billet Intake Manifold For 2JZ FT86 Swap Pure Automotive Engine Swap 0 12-01-2017 11:57 AM
SwapYour86.Com Pure 2JZ MoTeC Plug & Play Wiring For FT86 !! Pure Automotive Engine Swap 0 12-01-2017 11:49 AM
SwapYour86.Com Pure LSX MoTeC Plug & Play Wiring For FT86 !! Pure Automotive Engine Swap 0 12-01-2017 11:23 AM
Pure Auto's 2JZ Swap Thread - The DRAGFRS Pure Automotive Engine Swaps 153 06-20-2016 06:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.