follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack

Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-08-2013, 11:40 PM   #1
Renny
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: scion frs
Location: fullerton
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
New rims on stock tires?

i was interested in getting the work emotion kiwami wheels in size
17x7.0 / 5x100 / Offset +47

is that okay? nothing wrong with that right? because i see a lot of people with bigger tires and rims...

why do people have different tire sizes for the front and back of the car?


Renny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2013, 11:45 PM   #2
NickFRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: Gladstone
Posts: 1,450
Thanks: 899
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Why? Might as well keep your stocks... If you spending the cash to buy wheels get something more aggressive.




But yes those are basically identical to stock.

stock = 17x7 48 offset

at least get some 17x8 45 offset so your flusher <- stock tires will be stretched on that. I ran stocks on 17x8 for a while before upgrading to some real tires... 235/45/17. Soon going to change the fronts to 235/40/17 and rear to 240/40/17
__________________
2013 Sion FRS
2014 Subaru WRX
2014 Subaru XV
NickFRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 09:18 PM   #3
hushypushy
ビーアールゼット
 
hushypushy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: WRB BRZ '18
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 139
Thanks: 16
Thanked 86 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renny View Post
i was interested in getting the work emotion kiwami wheels in size
17x7.0 / 5x100 / Offset +47

is that okay? nothing wrong with that right? because i see a lot of people with bigger tires and rims...

why do people have different tire sizes for the front and back of the car?
Well, there's nothing "wrong" with that. That's almost identical to the stock wheel size (17x7 +48, IIRC) so it will be very similar to the OEM look and performance. The "problem" is, well, the same thing: the OEM wheels are narrow and the OEM tires are scrawny, which is the main reason you'd want to upgrade to something else.

People put on bigger wheels and tires for two main reasons: style and performance (aka form and function). Some people go for a balance of the two, some people lean toward one or the other.

On this car, different (staggered) F/R wheel or tire sizes are typically for the "style" side of the equation. The 86 is very well balanced, and so far I haven't seen any evidence that anything but a square (same size at all corners) wheel/tire size is optimum for performance.
hushypushy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 09:20 PM   #4
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,442 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renny View Post
i was interested in getting the work emotion kiwami wheels in size
17x7.0 / 5x100 / Offset +47

is that okay? nothing wrong with that right? because i see a lot of people with bigger tires and rims...

why do people have different tire sizes for the front and back of the car?


why do you want to do that?
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 10:11 PM   #5
Mr Franky
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Vehicle
Location: Aust
Posts: 164
Thanks: 8
Thanked 90 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
why do you want to do that?
Because someone might want to keep the same low friction tyres and save weight at the same time. With a bonus of having better looking wheels.

Quite simple actually.
Mr Franky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr Franky For This Useful Post:
fender9530 (05-13-2013)
Old 05-09-2013, 10:18 PM   #6
MVJ1975
Automatic Hooligan
 
MVJ1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 978
Thanks: 276
Thanked 385 Times in 238 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I went with a similar solution (17x7 +42) but junked my Primacys and went to stickier rubber in 215 size.

I wanted to preserve as much of the tail-out fun of the stock car as possible, but gain a little bit more grip - especially in the wet. I've got better looking, lighter wheels now, too.
__________________
MVJ1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 10:26 PM   #7
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,442 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Franky View Post
Because someone might want to keep the same low friction tyres and save weight at the same time. With a bonus of having better looking wheels.

Quite simple actually.
i asked him because i wanted to know his reasoning, not to be an ass. its not simple at all really. if you want to have light wheels to improve gas mileage, that is stupid. why spend over a thousand dollars to save a couple cents at the pump? if you want to save weight to go faster, you are only going to be dissapointed because wheel weight is borderline insignificant while spending half the money on tires will shave seconds of any qualitative test you can throw at the car. if it is to look cool, thats fine (unless youre trying to impress someone who feels that going fast looks cooler than looking fast). again, i only asked so that the op might receive a more informed response and can make a decision more suited to his goals.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 11:00 PM   #8
Vracer111
Senior Member
 
Vracer111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: '13 Nissan Frontier (4.0L 6spd 2WD)
Location: In the desert...
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,245 Times in 669 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Reducing unsprung mass really improves the ride quality...Aftermarket wheels dimensioned like stock but that weigh 3 lbs less than stock give a very noticeable improvement in ride quality with the stock tires and suspension. The main reason for reducing wheel weight should be to reduce unsprung weight for improving ride quality by letting the stock suspension work more efficiently and with less wear rate.
__________________
Had a '13 FR-S Asphalt 6spd manual (bought new 5/25/12, sold 6/10/20) but needed to let her go... she will be missed.
Vracer111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2013, 06:21 PM   #9
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,442 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vracer111 View Post
Reducing unsprung mass really improves the ride quality...Aftermarket wheels dimensioned like stock but that weigh 3 lbs less than stock give a very noticeable improvement in ride quality with the stock tires and suspension. The main reason for reducing wheel weight should be to reduce unsprung weight for improving ride quality by letting the stock suspension work more efficiently and with less wear rate.
if you plan on spending close to $2000 dollars for the sake of ride quality, there are better places to start than rims. i dont know if wear rate is too valid considering that you end up spending more than you would save. i guess its just me thinking that the only real reason to do this would be because you think it looks cool.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2013, 09:08 PM   #10
Vracer111
Senior Member
 
Vracer111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: '13 Nissan Frontier (4.0L 6spd 2WD)
Location: In the desert...
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,245 Times in 669 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I'd agree that spending ~$2k on wheels mainly for ride quality is overdoing it, because for a little over $2k you would get much better results with the Essex Sprint AP racing brake system (20lb reduction from stock) while improving braking at the same time. However, dropping ~3.5lbs from stock mass for less than $800 total for a new set of Enkei Fujin's as the daily wheels is really reasonable (especially when you sell the stock wheels)...plus the car looks nicer as well:



And by wear rate I meant wear rate of the suspension components, meaning the stock shocks last longer and a little less wear/tear on bushings etc... for a given mileage.
__________________
Had a '13 FR-S Asphalt 6spd manual (bought new 5/25/12, sold 6/10/20) but needed to let her go... she will be missed.
Vracer111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2013, 06:51 PM   #11
Gunman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2019 Mazda Miata RF
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,105
Thanks: 979
Thanked 1,317 Times in 736 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Does anyone have good pix of OEM 215/45 tires on 17x8 wheels? off the car? I'd like to see the stretch. I'm weighing options, and upgrading rims now, tires later is one route.
Gunman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2013, 07:00 PM   #12
abutterman
Senior Member
 
abutterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited - WRB, MT
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 58
Thanked 176 Times in 139 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunman View Post
Does anyone have good pix of OEM 215/45 tires on 17x8 wheels? off the car? I'd like to see the stretch. I'm weighing options, and upgrading rims now, tires later is one route.
check out my pictures here http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35886

they're not the oem ones but they're the same size on 17x8. It's stretched a little bit but nothing ridiculous.
abutterman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2013, 07:05 PM   #13
Vten
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Too heavy
Location: Columbus
Posts: 788
Thanks: 91
Thanked 288 Times in 186 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
this is mine on 17x8.25 stock Michelins ...
Attached Images
   
Vten is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vten For This Useful Post:
Juvenile (06-02-2013)
Old 05-12-2013, 07:19 PM   #14
FRSFOB
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: Canada
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^^^That looks awesome man.
FRSFOB is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MA WTB:2 Stock Rims with tires Tt3Sheppard Wheels and Tires 3 04-24-2013 11:18 PM
Wtb: stock rims only no tires whitefrs Wheels and Tires 1 04-24-2013 11:16 PM
FS - 4x Stock FRS Rims with Tires NO TPMS sidnacious Wheels and Tires 5 04-16-2013 08:10 PM
WTB: OEM Stock rims and tires HATED1 Wheels and Tires 4 08-29-2012 02:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.