follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2016, 12:25 PM   #449
Tectoniic
#FiftyShadesOfBlue
 
Tectoniic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,195
Thanks: 2,086
Thanked 1,425 Times in 730 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Copied over the latest cranking tables as mine were way out of date and finally did the fix for the fans to come on sooner. Too lazy to log but quite a nice difference in IATs when sitting in traffic when it is 80*f+ ambient. Thank you for all your help @Wayno
__________________
Engine/Exhaust: OFT w/ E85 Tune | FT86SF Catted UEL | Invidia Q300 Catback
Wheels/Tires/Suspension: Avid.1 AV-20 18x8.5 +33 w/ 245/35/18 PSS | RCE Yellow Springs | Velox LCAs
Cosmetic: Valenti FT86SF Special Edition Tails | Diode Dynamics Full HID/LEDs | BRZ Fender Garnishes

Tectoniic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2016, 01:58 AM   #450
Rezi
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 69
Thanks: 17
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
@Wayno, is your v104 Stage 1 safe to run on pump-gas? You mentioned something that "it is for flex-fuel", but i never will run on any Ethanol.
Rezi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2016, 02:48 AM   #451
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rezi View Post
@Wayno, is your v104 Stage 1 safe to run on pump-gas? You mentioned something that "it is for flex-fuel", but i never will run on any Ethanol.
Haven't posted anything for flex fuel and if i did it wouldn't be for stg1. But yes it's fine.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2016, 11:47 PM   #452
phrosty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Seattle
Posts: 806
Thanks: 202
Thanked 320 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I see you've changed overrun a fair bit in your latest. Any links explaining what it affects?
__________________
2013 Whiteout 6AT FR-S | Perrin Inlet Tube + 2.75" CAI | OpenFlash Header | P&L Catback | 4.88 Final Drive | Dialed in OFT 2.0x Stage 2 E85 | 18x8 Enkei Raijin + 225/40 Michelin Pilot Super Sport | 17x7 Stock + 215/45 Michelin X-Ice Xi-2
phrosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2016, 03:24 AM   #453
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phrosty View Post
I see you've changed overrun a fair bit in your latest. Any links explaining what it affects?
Did you look at the table properties?

Throttle plate angle.

Last edited by Wayno; 07-09-2016 at 11:50 PM.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post:
phrosty (06-22-2016)
Old 06-22-2016, 09:18 PM   #454
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
This is not the full picture as these are paired with exhaust cam, a 3D graph of the valve overlap would be better. But gives some indication of the work done on AVCS.

EL OTS 91 vs EL v107 Intake cam



STOCK vs OFH vs UEL v107 Intake cam

Attached Images
  

Last edited by Wayno; 06-22-2016 at 09:43 PM.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post:
elBarto (06-24-2016)
Old 06-24-2016, 10:32 PM   #455
Blood
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: 2018 STI
Location: RI
Posts: 167
Thanks: 3
Thanked 59 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
If I wanted to use the E85 cranking tables with DW 700cc injectors what would I need to scale the tables by? It is current value x old injector scaling / new injector scaling, right? The E85 roms have 171cc/min scaling (stock roms have 228cc/min) and I am assuming I would use 700cc/min as the scaling for the larger injectors. So in that case, the cranking tables should be scaled down to 24.43% of their current values?
Blood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 10:39 PM   #456
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood View Post
If I wanted to use the E85 cranking tables with DW 700cc injectors what would I need to scale the tables by? It is current value x old injector scaling / new injector scaling, right? The E85 roms have 171cc/min scaling (stock roms have 228cc/min) and I am assuming I would use 700cc/min as the scaling for the larger injectors. So in that case, the cranking tables should be scaled down to 24.43% of their current values?
I've no idea. Better to start a new thread in software section to ask some of the FI guys that are FI - kodename, ztan, shiv, etc. These values are for stock/NA only.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2016, 05:00 AM   #457
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood View Post
If I wanted to use the E85 cranking tables with DW 700cc injectors what would I need to scale the tables by? It is current value x old injector scaling / new injector scaling, right? The E85 roms have 171cc/min scaling (stock roms have 228cc/min) and I am assuming I would use 700cc/min as the scaling for the larger injectors. So in that case, the cranking tables should be scaled down to 24.43% of their current values?
The E85 ROMs scale "down" the value to provide more fuel for the requirements of E85. So what you need to do is give the new injector scalar the same ratio. So (171/228)*700.

For the cranking values, you would reduce these by (228/700)*original value. That's based on the original E85 cranking tables.

Don't forget to set the latency values too, and confirm that 700cc is the correct value to set.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2016, 04:11 PM   #458
phrosty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Seattle
Posts: 806
Thanks: 202
Thanked 320 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Your VVT smoothing gives a pretty striking improvement to driveability when just cruising around. Almost completely removed bogging down on light throttle 2500->1900rpm upshifts. Going to give it a go at dialing in a bit more, but fantastic work.
__________________
2013 Whiteout 6AT FR-S | Perrin Inlet Tube + 2.75" CAI | OpenFlash Header | P&L Catback | 4.88 Final Drive | Dialed in OFT 2.0x Stage 2 E85 | 18x8 Enkei Raijin + 225/40 Michelin Pilot Super Sport | 17x7 Stock + 215/45 Michelin X-Ice Xi-2
phrosty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to phrosty For This Useful Post:
Wayno (07-09-2016)
Old 07-03-2016, 06:10 PM   #459
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phrosty View Post
Your VVT smoothing gives a pretty striking improvement to driveability when just cruising around. Almost completely removed bogging down on light throttle 2500->1900rpm upshifts. Going to give it a go at dialing in a bit more, but fantastic work.
I got 5L/100km @ 115kph / 2200 rpm the other day. That 56.5 mpg. So I would recommend not touching 2200 rpm.

It's possible the 2000 rpm row could use some more advance though as it was also 5L/100km, like this.
0, 0, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19.

I just didn't want to stray too far from every other calibration out there and also I'm tired of flashing and testing.

I've added that timing to the OP as v107.1.

Last edited by Wayno; 07-05-2016 at 01:54 AM.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post:
gonzo (09-09-2016), phrosty (07-07-2016)
Old 07-07-2016, 02:21 PM   #460
Vash
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 14
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I was using the OFH AVCS tables and it was a bit difficult to drive in the lower RPMs (it felt very gutless below 3000RPM). It kind of felt like I had to avoid having my RPMs fall below 3000rpm or else it'd drop off a cliff and I had to climb back up, but after switching to the v107.1 tables, it felt much smoother and more linear. Thanks Wayno
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vash For This Useful Post:
Wayno (07-09-2016)
Old 07-09-2016, 07:30 AM   #461
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Attached Stg1 with smoothed AVCS tables at part throttle.
For comparison against vanilla Stg1/v107 only.

It should either feel noticeably improved with better economy
or will feel noticeably rubbish having too much cam advance for stock header.

Last edited by Wayno; 08-11-2016 at 08:24 PM.
Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2016, 09:25 AM   #462
freerunner
Senior Member
 
freerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
Attached Stg1 with smoothed AVCS tables at part throttle.
For comparison against vanilla Stg1/v107 only.

It should either feel noticeably improved with better economy
or will feel noticeably rubbish having too much cam advance for stock header.
Going to check it out.
freerunner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freerunner For This Useful Post:
Wayno (07-09-2016)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help uploading 2.06 tunes to OFT Jimmy817 Software Tuning 3 12-28-2014 09:06 PM
Custom Az Tunes Juggles Arizona 13 11-08-2014 10:15 AM
EcuTek Tunes Rio Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 1 04-29-2014 12:10 AM
How long until *other tunes? ScionFrsFan Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 61 12-07-2012 05:34 PM
Speedhunters - TRD TUNES THE 86 quik1987 FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 69 05-22-2012 04:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.