follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-06-2015, 09:42 PM   #15
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,795
Thanks: 2,171
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaoskaze View Post
If you sent 25k on a camero , you not gonna get 1LE or Z/28 suspensions & nobody is gonna spent more then 10k to fix camero suspensions alone.

They will be upping the power of the turbo 4 first.
The 1LE and Z/28 packages were just examples of what can be done to the Camaro platform itself. Similar to the FR-S, you can upgrade the suspension for much cheaper than $10k.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2015, 09:57 PM   #16
EAGLE5
Dismember
 
EAGLE5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,562
Thanks: 2,153
Thanked 4,002 Times in 2,157 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
No matter what you do to a massive car, it's still a massive car. Pigs can dance, but they're still pigs.
EAGLE5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2015, 10:10 PM   #17
Deep Six
Senior Member
 
Deep Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS / 2013 427 Vert
Location: Orlando
Posts: 611
Thanks: 212
Thanked 328 Times in 197 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
This chassis is transformational for GM. The ATS is a legitimate market contender, the V version clocked a 2:59 during lightning lap at VIR. The new Camaro will likely far exceed expectations and may be lighter than the Mustang in similar trim. Tuning potential for the turbo four?????? Chevy sells the current 1LE and Z28 suspension setups over the counter (check out the Grass Roots car) for a steal. However we have flown way past the original 30K.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
2013 FR-S Asphalt BC Coils/Rev Works UEL header/HKS Front Pipe/Racing Brake BBK/Shorai LW Battery/ACT 6 Puck Clutch/FBM Radiator & Oil Pan/JR Oil Cooler/Jackson Racing High Boost C30/Rev Works Built Motor
2016 Audi TTS APR Tuned
Deep Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2015, 07:50 PM   #18
dtrop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Wrb 2014 limited brZ
Location: United States
Posts: 436
Thanks: 5
Thanked 185 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ford said they were going the shed weight on the new mustang......


They added weight
dtrop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2015, 08:55 PM   #19
RandomDeception
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Stock FR-S
Location: The Land of Always Winter
Posts: 121
Thanks: 73
Thanked 63 Times in 39 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrop View Post
Ford said they were going the shed weight on the new mustang......


They added weight
No they weren't; they never said that. That was actually a rather baseless rumour spread on the web.

Though, I don't even know how people online thought that would be possible with Ford newly adding an independent rear suspension to the Mustang and thus adding even more weight.
RandomDeception is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RandomDeception For This Useful Post:
Rampage (09-08-2015)
Old 09-07-2015, 09:22 PM   #20
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,375
Thanks: 13,767
Thanked 9,494 Times in 5,007 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomDeception View Post
No they weren't; they never said that. That was actually a rather baseless rumour spread on the web.

Though, I don't even know how people online thought that would be possible with Ford newly adding an independent rear suspension to the Mustang and thus adding even more weight.
Here was the source for the baseless rumor.

http://www.edmunds.com/car-news/2015...cat=affiliates

Edmunds isn't in the habit of rumor mongering to my knowledge.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2015, 09:32 PM   #21
RandomDeception
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: Stock FR-S
Location: The Land of Always Winter
Posts: 121
Thanks: 73
Thanked 63 Times in 39 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
Here was the source for the baseless rumor.

http://www.edmunds.com/car-news/2015...cat=affiliates

Edmunds isn't in the habit of rumor mongering to my knowledge.
Wow. Nine "the source said" in one article. That read like one of those terrible BRZ STi rumour articles published during this year April. Haha.


Quote:
"Ford did not respond immediately to a query from Edmunds asking about the Mustang weight-loss program."
Really though, this said it all.
RandomDeception is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RandomDeception For This Useful Post:
Rampage (09-08-2015), strat61caster (09-07-2015)
Old 09-08-2015, 12:10 AM   #22
Bergen23
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: '15 Halo FR-S
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,317
Thanks: 922
Thanked 950 Times in 492 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Whenever I read these threads, I'm always blown away by how many people know so much about cars that they haven't driven.
Bergen23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bergen23 For This Useful Post:
evomike (09-08-2015), flippy (09-15-2015), meWant (09-09-2015), Premium 615 (09-15-2015), raven1231 (09-08-2015), RustySocket (09-28-2015), strat61caster (09-08-2015), Tcoat (09-08-2015)
Old 09-08-2015, 01:23 AM   #23
EAGLE5
Dismember
 
EAGLE5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Red Scion FR-S
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 5,562
Thanks: 2,153
Thanked 4,002 Times in 2,157 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergen23 View Post
Whenever I read these threads, I'm always blown away by how many people know so much about cars that they haven't driven.
Yes, it's like historians who study something without having even been alive at the time. I have consistently found that reviews in aggregate give wonderfully accurate information. The frs drives exactly as the bulk of reviews said it would.
EAGLE5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EAGLE5 For This Useful Post:
Entroper (09-08-2015)
Old 09-08-2015, 05:20 AM   #24
Captain Snooze
Because compromise ®
 
Captain Snooze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,767
Thanks: 4,021
Thanked 9,455 Times in 4,157 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Buy the Camaro or don't. Get an BRZ/FRS or don't. You don't need forum posts to support your decision do you? The FT86Club forum may curse you if you get a Comaro but you will make new "friends" at the Chevy forum.
The world will not implode due to your car purchasing decision.
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.

Captain Snooze is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Captain Snooze For This Useful Post:
raven1231 (09-08-2015)
Old 09-08-2015, 09:25 AM   #25
Bergen23
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: '15 Halo FR-S
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,317
Thanks: 922
Thanked 950 Times in 492 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsimon7777 View Post
Yes, it's like historians who study something without having even been alive at the time. I have consistently found that reviews in aggregate give wonderfully accurate information. The frs drives exactly as the bulk of reviews said it would.
But that's you taking opinions. I've seen enough bad reviews of the twins to know that you should take every review with a grain of salt.

But then I always forget that the only cars superior to the twins are Cayman's and 100k+ supercars, but then only ones that have manual trannys.

EDIT: And after being in a ride along in a friend's 2015 Mustang GT, that is a capable (to me) car. It's comfy, fast and can handle surprisingly well, considering everyone and their mother on the internet says if you try to turn a Mustang, it'll explode. I've stopped putting the twins on the pedestal, since I know that it isn't the "right" car for me. It's also funny how when any car gets brought up in comparison the argument always comes back to "But it's so heavy, wah wah wah wah". Yes, the twins provide a great driving experience, but is it REALLY that much better of an experience?

You can talk sales numbers all you want about the Twins outselling everything else in their "category" (Ie, 2 door sports car, so Twins, Miata, 350/370, Genesis, Mustang, Camaro, Challenger, whatever else I'm missing) but, the twins are also the cheapest, are they not? That was a pretty big selling point for me, and they got even cheaper, because I got an employee discount and a grad rebate. If they were all equal price, I probably would have gotten into something else.
Bergen23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bergen23 For This Useful Post:
Chad11491 (09-09-2015), Dadhawk (09-08-2015), Tcoat (09-08-2015)
Old 09-08-2015, 10:09 AM   #26
Dadhawk
1st86 Driver!
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 19,887
Thanks: 39,032
Thanked 25,091 Times in 11,446 Posts
Mentioned: 182 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergen23 View Post
... but, the twins are also the cheapest, are they not? That was a pretty big selling point for me, and they got even cheaper, because I got an employee discount and a grad rebate. If they were all equal price, I probably would have gotten into something else.
I'm with @Bergen23 on this one. At the end of the day, of all the cars I was looking at in 2012 when I ended up with the FR-S, it was the price that was the final deciding factor. Had it been 10% more expensive, I would have ended up with a different car.


All vehicles have compromises somewhere. You just have to be able to live with them for the price you pay.
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.

Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S
Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark.
What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk".
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post:
Bergen23 (09-08-2015), Tcoat (09-08-2015)
Old 09-08-2015, 10:38 AM   #27
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,289 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2497 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dadhawk View Post
I'm with @Bergen23 on this one. At the end of the day, of all the cars I was looking at in 2012 when I ended up with the FR-S, it was the price that was the final deciding factor. Had it been 10% more expensive, I would have ended up with a different car.


All vehicles have compromises somewhere. You just have to be able to live with them for the price you pay.
Price was indeed a factor when I bought mine as well but not for the same reason as many. I was cross shopping with cars up to the $80K range and could easily have afforded one. As I have said before with the mileage I drive I chew cars up pretty fast and only keep them 4 or 5 years at best. I didn't want to rack up mega miles on an expensive Porsche or such so went with the FRS as an inexpensive, throwaway alternative (1/2 this forum just had a stroke at that I am sure).
Two seaters were right out of my list as I still wanted the availability of rear seats and the "muscle cars" all seemed to be way bigger and thirsty for gas then I wanted. The hot hatches held some appeal but my last 3 cars were all in that class and I wanted something a bit different. This left we with a very limited choice in new, "inexpensive" coupes. Unlike many I had seen the release of the FRS but never gave it much thought at the time and pretty much forgotten it existed. When I stumbled across it again at the dealers the price point got me in the seat for a test drive and the rest is history. If it had been much more I would have been in a 370Z or Genesis coupe for the simple fact they were tried and true already.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
Aztec (09-10-2015), Bergen23 (09-08-2015), brzaapi (09-09-2015), why? (09-08-2015)
Old 09-08-2015, 10:50 AM   #28
Dadhawk
1st86 Driver!
 
Dadhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S (#3 of 1st 86)
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 19,887
Thanks: 39,032
Thanked 25,091 Times in 11,446 Posts
Mentioned: 182 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
Price was indeed a factor when I bought mine as well but not for the same reason as many. I was cross shopping with cars up to the $80K range and could easily have afforded one. As I have said before with the mileage I drive I chew cars up pretty fast and only keep them 4 or 5 years at best. I didn't want to rack up mega miles on an expensive Porsche or such so went with the FRS as an inexpensive, throwaway alternative (1/2 this forum just had a stroke at that I am sure).

Pretty much the same here, my "shopping list" ranged from about $20,000 to a little over $70,000 when I bought the car. Had the C7 been available in 2012 there is a very good chance it would have won out over the FR-S (I didn't care much for the C6).


In the end, the "throwaway" aspect of the pricing in my situation won out for me as well.
__________________
Olivia 05/03/2012 - 01/06/2024. 231,146 glorious miles.

Visit my Owner's Journal where I wax philosophic on all things FR-S
Post your 86 or see others in front of a(n) (in)famous landmark.
What fits in your 86? Show us the "Junk In Your Trunk".
Dadhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dadhawk For This Useful Post:
Bergen23 (09-08-2015), brzaapi (09-09-2015), Tcoat (09-08-2015)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official 2016 Camaro Thread With Updates tahdizzle Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 486 08-01-2017 04:17 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.