follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2015, 06:29 PM   #29
D K
Stig's dark passenger
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: I work abroad
Posts: 724
Thanks: 60
Thanked 316 Times in 186 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew025 View Post
I want to see it

This is all Im able to show since the rest of our conversation was not something Im willing to share.

David

If possible please use a serpentine, since all our testing is done with this
type of belt.

As long as timing is not required we recommend s-belts for many reasons.
D K is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to D K For This Useful Post:
ATL BRZ (06-23-2015), ck-GT86 (06-23-2015), CSG Mike (06-23-2015), themajesticone (06-23-2015), zc06_kisstherain (09-21-2015)
Old 06-23-2015, 09:55 PM   #30
slipdog
Member
 
slipdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 65
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by themajesticone View Post
@slipdog

You can also argue that the fact they specifically put,

"Not following these specifications voids warranty and may result in permanent damage of the supercharger system and/or other systems in the vehicle/application"

...explicitly states it is highly not recommended as well as discouraged because of the above said repercussions.
Not really. If you look at the specifications, the only ones mandatory are things like bolt pattern/spacing, shaft diameter, depth, etc. So there is no explicit statement about cogged or not. If your pully is too fat or the diameter is too big, then yes. But you could make a cogged belt that fits their specifications and it will not void the warranty. Causing damage is unknown.
slipdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 09:58 PM   #31
Sammakko
Bilge monkey
 
Sammakko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: '13 BRZ, 82 starlet
Location: South King County
Posts: 370
Thanks: 74
Thanked 216 Times in 113 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by John92 View Post
I drove from WA to FL no oil cooler and the only problem I had my whole trip was due to bad fuel. I have not snapped a belt yet, and you should run clogged idler pulleys just saying.
that's a long ass drive
Sammakko is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sammakko For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (09-21-2015)
Old 06-23-2015, 10:02 PM   #32
themajesticone
Senior Member
 
themajesticone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: '13 UM86
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 406
Thanks: 338
Thanked 176 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by slipdog View Post
Not really. If you look at the specifications, the only ones mandatory are things like bolt pattern/spacing, shaft diameter, depth, etc. So there is no explicit statement about cogged or not. If your pully is too fat or the diameter is too big, then yes. But you could make a cogged belt that fits their specifications and it will not void the warranty. Causing damage is unknown.
You are clearly missing it and ignoring the words right in front of you provided above....

It is plenty clear and there is no room for confusion or doubt.
__________________

JRSC C30 91 oct | JDL UEL Header | Tomei Overpipe | Milltek Front Pipe | Milltek Catback | SPL LCA v2 | FA 500 v5 Coilovers 6k/7k | SPC Front Camber Bolts | Enkei RPF1 17x9 +35 | 245/40 Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Last edited by themajesticone; 06-23-2015 at 10:18 PM.
themajesticone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 10:20 PM   #33
Fastbrew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2014 Pearl White BRZ
Location: USA
Posts: 764
Thanks: 123
Thanked 461 Times in 233 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Wow - OP - so sorry you are dealing with an issue like this. What a total buzzkill. GL in your effort to get a stable ride.
Fastbrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 11:35 PM   #34
enivid
Senior Member
 
enivid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: WRB JR BRZED
Location: Farmington Utah
Posts: 445
Thanks: 6
Thanked 218 Times in 133 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KraftWerks View Post
Please show us where Rotrex doesn't recommend the cogged system?
What is your hypothesis on why your kit tends to breaks belts? All user error or a design problem?
enivid is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to enivid For This Useful Post:
Apoc (06-24-2015), ck-GT86 (06-23-2015)
Old 06-24-2015, 02:26 AM   #35
Andrew025
Senior Member
 
Andrew025's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Neptune GR86
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,862
Thanks: 1,438
Thanked 3,505 Times in 1,806 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by enivid View Post
What is your hypothesis on why your kit tends to breaks belts? All user error or a design problem?
I'm assuming this is rhetorical?
__________________
Andrew025 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 04:00 PM   #36
s0sl0w
Proud of Boxer
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Maryland
Posts: 501
Thanks: 176
Thanked 273 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Seems like KW could resolve this easily enough by offering or changing the kut to a ribbe belt. However the shock explanation makes a hell of a lot of sense to this engineering student. Damn shame that kraftwerks doesn't seem to want to recognize the issue either as I believe they honestly have the superior tubing route.
s0sl0w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 04:14 PM   #37
ATL BRZ
Driving Coach
 
ATL BRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: BRZ
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 3,723
Thanked 4,137 Times in 1,707 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by s0sl0w View Post
... as I believe they honestly have the superior tubing route.
Please elaborate; from what I've observed the charge piping on both the JR and KW kits follow the same route.

From the SC outlet they both route the piping under the driver's headlight down around the washer fluid reservoir with a bend feeding the intercooler and then back up under the opposite headlight and onward into the intake manifold.
ATL BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 04:38 PM   #38
Andrew025
Senior Member
 
Andrew025's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Neptune GR86
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,862
Thanks: 1,438
Thanked 3,505 Times in 1,806 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATL BRZ View Post
Please elaborate; from what I've observed the charge piping on both the JR and KW kits follow the same route.

From the SC outlet they both route the piping under the driver's headlight down around the washer fluid reservoir with a bend feeding the intercooler and then back up under the opposite headlight and onward into the intake manifold.
He's probably talking about the curve right before the TB, although it isn't as drastic a curve as many people think.
__________________
Andrew025 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Andrew025 For This Useful Post:
s0sl0w (06-24-2015)
Old 06-24-2015, 04:41 PM   #39
s0sl0w
Proud of Boxer
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Maryland
Posts: 501
Thanks: 176
Thanked 273 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
That's exactly it, I'd also like to see the j/r utlize a more sealed filter. I can fix the filter quibbles myself. Not much I can do about the curve ahead of the TB.
s0sl0w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 04:50 PM   #40
ATL BRZ
Driving Coach
 
ATL BRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: BRZ
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 3,723
Thanked 4,137 Times in 1,707 Posts
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew025 View Post
He's probably talking about the curve right before the TB, although it isn't as drastic a curve as many people think.
The air in that curved inlet tube has already been metered by the MAF and most tuners use a speed density hybrid tune using the MAP sensor in the manifold past the TB so not sure what his point is.

After looking at the dyno comparisons between the kits and understanding how they both measure airflow and manifold pressure again I don't see anything superior about the routing of the KW kit's charge piping.

Quote:
Originally Posted by s0sl0w View Post
That's exactly it, I'd also like to see the j/r utlize a more sealed filter. I can fix the filter quibbles myself. Not much I can do about the curve ahead of the TB.
Did you know that CSG has measured and logged intake air temperatures to be lower than stock with the JRSC kit? It's not hindering performance in any way having the air filter exposed in the engine bay. Intercooling takes care of all those concerns. The filter gets fresh air through the same opening that the stock airbox snorkel does at speed.

If you're really that worried about it and have money to burn then you can buy what Pure made for the Vortech kit. Should be relatively easy to adapt or put your own together.


Last edited by ATL BRZ; 06-24-2015 at 05:03 PM.
ATL BRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 05:02 PM   #41
s0sl0w
Proud of Boxer
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Maryland
Posts: 501
Thanks: 176
Thanked 273 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If you looks at the exhaust data, the Kraft kit makes almost all of the power of the JR but is doing it with a cat back and 2 cats in play vs the JR car having no cats and "full exhaust" (header?). Since the tuner and gas was the same and they use the same blower that pretty much leaves the tubing. Kraft has placed the blower and filter better (more efficiently) but then fucked it all with belt/pulley setup. Ideally a Kraft kit with non cogged pulleys/belt would be the best I'd hazard.
s0sl0w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 05:17 PM   #42
Andrew025
Senior Member
 
Andrew025's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Neptune GR86
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,862
Thanks: 1,438
Thanked 3,505 Times in 1,806 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by s0sl0w View Post
If you looks at the exhaust data, the Kraft kit makes almost all of the power of the JR but is doing it with a cat back and 2 cats in play vs the JR car having no cats and "full exhaust" (header?). Since the tuner and gas was the same and they use the same blower that pretty much leaves the tubing. Kraft has placed the blower and filter better (more efficiently) but then fucked it all with belt/pulley setup. Ideally a Kraft kit with non cogged pulleys/belt would be the best I'd hazard.
Exhaust setup doesn't make that much of a difference with a SC setup anyway, not like a turbo at least.
I don't think the tubing will make much of a difference either.
__________________
Andrew025 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
forced induction, kraftwerks, supercharger


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wtb: kraftwerks supercharger darnbry Want-To-Buy Requests 1 08-31-2014 02:04 PM
F/S Kraftwerks supercharger kit captain_jack Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 27 06-10-2014 10:34 AM
Kraftwerks Supercharger kit-Now stocked at JRP Stav Canada Classifieds 4 05-27-2014 09:07 PM
KraftWerks SuperCharger Ocho Seis CANADA 18 04-06-2014 10:33 PM
Kraftwerks Supercharger?? umpadupa Forced Induction 1 08-05-2013 05:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.