12-16-2014, 01:32 PM | #57 | |
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: JDL Turbo FRS, 335SC BRZ (ret)
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 932
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,547 Times in 525 Posts
Mentioned: 380 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I do have one correction and that is the 15% gain in going to a smaller pulley. That was referencing going from a 75 to a 70 on the 210, here we would go from an 80 to a 70, which would be double that. So going to the raceseng 70 would probably end up with 400+ assuming the stock/header and exhaust would allow it. Another issue though is the intake, we're hitting 5v on our big intake, which means you'd need a 3.5" MAF or bigger to flow what this would flow on a smaller pulley. If we didn't have the MAP sensor fluctuation issue we could do speed density, but not an option in the current configuration. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Xero-Limit For This Useful Post: | yomny (12-16-2014) |
12-17-2014, 06:35 AM | #58 |
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: JDL Turbo FRS, 335SC BRZ (ret)
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 932
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,547 Times in 525 Posts
Mentioned: 380 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
Put in a 3 bar MAP sensor to see where boost falls in. About 2.3 bar or 19 psi peak. Note that past 5k we see the variability that causes misfires. OEM sensor is going back in.
Also filled up with pump gas, but there's still some e70 in there, down to about e30. So far so good, employing the cam changes and pulling a bit extra timing to keep knock counts at bay. Still pulling stronger than the 210 on e85 by a good margin. |
12-17-2014, 07:07 AM | #59 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: GT86 in Orange
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Thanks: 1
Thanked 32 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
very interesting reading Mike, maybe time to get a few 355's shipped into the UK......
Last edited by Mark@Abbey m/s; 12-17-2014 at 08:12 AM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark@Abbey m/s For This Useful Post: | Kodename47 (12-19-2014) |
12-17-2014, 09:09 AM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: ft86
Location: ft86
Posts: 232
Thanks: 3
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Does a different brand map sensor work without the variability?
|
12-18-2014, 04:14 AM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: GT 86
Location: australia
Posts: 369
Thanks: 84
Thanked 121 Times in 77 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Mike if you were to build an engine for the 335 what compression ratio would be better in your opinion 9:1 or 10:1 ?
|
12-18-2014, 01:52 PM | #62 | |
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: JDL Turbo FRS, 335SC BRZ (ret)
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 932
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,547 Times in 525 Posts
Mentioned: 380 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
@blown, no way to use a 3rd party 3 bar in the provided location. A "surge" tank as simple as a vacuum manifold may work. Just need to dampen the signal. You could easily wire in a GM 3 bar MAP sensor and just get the signal by tapping the plate for a 1/8 NPT. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Xero-Limit For This Useful Post: | NLS8520 (08-17-2015) |
12-21-2014, 08:02 AM | #63 |
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: JDL Turbo FRS, 335SC BRZ (ret)
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 932
Thanks: 368
Thanked 1,547 Times in 525 Posts
Mentioned: 380 Post(s)
Tagged: 6 Thread(s)
|
Pump Gas Update!
Got the ethanol burned through and put nearly 800 miles on the car since the blower went in. Some highway, but some were going up and down our local "race track" showing customers what this setup can do. Immediately once we got down to e30 we saw increasing knock counts, tip in knock, and the normal ethanol corrections weren't quite correct due to being at such high boost. We got the timing down, and reverted to our reduced cam timings. That brought the knock counts down to reasonable levels you might see with a 210, only with about 50 more HP. Eventually dropped it down to full pump gas, and everything is just fine. Some observations here: On pump gas you definitely make more power with the 335 over the 210, by far. But if you run exclusively pump gas, a lower boost system would be best. The reasoning is that when you turn the bigger blower to make 18-19 psi, you're using up lots of HP to do that. So the 335 at 300hp will really be taxing the motor an extra 20 or so HP over the 210 to make the same. Even though we reduce ignition timing to reduce the load on the motor and cut back power, you're still compressing a much larger amount of air. That means you're using more fuel and engine power to achieve the same power levels. Only caveat is that we're still making way more power on pump gas than the 210 did on e85 and small pulley. I think our preliminary conclusion here is that this setup is NOT for:
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Xero-Limit For This Useful Post: | Calum (12-21-2014), Chad86 (02-06-2015), CK_Bladesmith (12-21-2014), eddieflyinv (12-21-2014), hmong337 (03-23-2015), Jeremiahlee34 (06-25-2016), Lawnik (12-21-2014), sato (12-21-2014), Toyota86.ir (02-09-2016), yomny (12-21-2014) |
12-21-2014, 09:36 AM | #64 |
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Last edited by Calum; 12-21-2014 at 10:48 AM. |
12-21-2014, 12:33 PM | #65 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ
Location: United States
Posts: 143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
12-21-2014, 03:22 PM | #66 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: ft86
Location: ft86
Posts: 232
Thanks: 3
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
anyone try doing this with success? |
|
12-23-2014, 12:11 AM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: GT 86
Location: australia
Posts: 369
Thanks: 84
Thanked 121 Times in 77 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Any more updates on this ?
|
12-23-2014, 04:45 AM | #68 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Doesn't matter built or not, e85 is always safer than pump.
__________________
|
|
12-23-2014, 08:34 AM | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 869
Thanks: 321
Thanked 347 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
12-23-2014, 02:43 PM | #70 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 860 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I would never run a 335 or turbo over 12PSI on anything but E50+ built engine or not. |
|
|
|
Tags |
500whp or bust, sprintex, sprintex 335 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The new sprintex 335 supercharger | jet86 | Forced Induction | 39 | 11-01-2014 11:27 AM |
Innovate/sprintex SC | rudysaliby | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 3 | 10-28-2014 03:14 PM |
Innovate/ Sprintex vs vortech | GeeTee86 | AFRICA | 24 | 04-04-2014 02:38 PM |
Innovate/ Sprintex vs vortech | GeeTee86 | AFRICA | 5 | 03-05-2014 07:26 AM |
TyperRspec789's Full Blown Stage 1 Base Turbo & e85 Progress and Testing | TyperRspec789 | Forced Induction | 63 | 12-31-2013 07:39 PM |