follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2012, 10:55 PM   #1
Pakjk89
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2010 VW GTI
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 67
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
BRZ/FR-S Vs. Civic SI

More than the driving dynamics, I am thinking the engines were somewhat comparable. Besides the obvious (vtec vs NA) Power figures are almost spot on (last gen civic si). Anyone car to speculate if the engine will act similarly because of this?
Pakjk89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 11:14 PM   #2
NESW20
2.1L 3SGTE
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MR2 Turbo & Tacoma
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 29
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
uhh, vtec is na...
__________________
1991 MR2 Turbo - 2.1L high compression stroker 3SGTE
2006 Tacoma 4x4 TRD Off Road - All-Pro front bumper, Old Man Emu shocks, Old Man Emu HD front coils, All-Pro leafs
1990 240SX Coupe - sold
2008 Civic Si Sedan
NESW20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 11:22 PM   #3
Pakjk89
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2010 VW GTI
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 67
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NESW20 View Post
uhh, vtec is na...
Yeah but aren't their slight differences between vtec and a normal NA?
Pakjk89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 11:31 PM   #4
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I don't think there's a such thing as a "normal" NA...VTEC is just a particular variable valve actuation system.
Anyways, the Civic is probably a bit stronger below 3000rpm because of VTEC, the FA20 has pretty crappy low end torque because it only has cam phasing, but the Civic weighs more and has FWD.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 11:32 PM   #5
TheBoogieBot
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: SWP 6 Spd Limited
Location: Missouri
Posts: 15
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pakjk89 View Post
Yeah but aren't their slight differences between vtec and a normal NA?
VTEC is just the way the valves work. Toyota and pretty much every auto maker these days makes their own version of VTEC. They do use VTEC on turbo cars also though.

As for your other question I'd say the Civic SI would be slightly slower then the FRS because the weight of the scion is less.
TheBoogieBot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 11:33 PM   #6
NESW20
2.1L 3SGTE
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MR2 Turbo & Tacoma
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 29
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
different cam profile. not enough to warrant a new category of n/a.

back to topic, i think both cars will be a lot of fun and drive quite well. the civic is going to be more practical for carrying people (especially if you get the sedan) and the K20 responds very well to mods. IMO, you can't go wrong with either car.
__________________
1991 MR2 Turbo - 2.1L high compression stroker 3SGTE
2006 Tacoma 4x4 TRD Off Road - All-Pro front bumper, Old Man Emu shocks, Old Man Emu HD front coils, All-Pro leafs
1990 240SX Coupe - sold
2008 Civic Si Sedan
NESW20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 11:34 PM   #7
GT
Senior Member
 
GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: N/A
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 127
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pakjk89 View Post
Yeah but aren't their slight differences between vtec and a normal NA?
vtec stands for Variable Valve Timing Engine Control. Its the timing for the cams of the engine which can can SOHC or DOHC (single or double).

EDIT: replied too late lol
__________________
GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 12:14 AM   #8
Dark
Elite Padawan
 
Dark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: '15 WRX, 15 GLA250, and 2 feet
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 3,498
Thanks: 197
Thanked 250 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Last generation Si has 197hp and 140lb.ft of torque, and it does 6.7sec about the same as FR-S/BRZ 0-62 in 6.9sec. The new generation is 200hp and 170lb.ft of torque. It's faster than the last gen and FR-S/BRZ straight-line( if that's all you care). It will probably be faster than FR-S at the track with summer tire package.
__________________
Dark
Dark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 12:16 AM   #9
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Dark I think you should hold off on that conclusion until independent tests are done, there are quite a few factors in the BRZ/FRS's favor such as ~6% less weight, RWD, not to mention that the gears seem too short to hit 60, which means the acceleration under 60 will actually feel stronger...The ft-lb number doesn't mean squat, what's important is that the Hondas don't have a torque dead zone below 3000 while the BRZ does, but a mild launch will take care of that disadvantage.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 12:22 AM   #10
tranzformer
Delights in pure handling
 
tranzformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NESW20 View Post
uhh, vtec is na...
"Yo VTEC just kicked in!"
tranzformer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 12:24 AM   #11
Dark
Elite Padawan
 
Dark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: '15 WRX, 15 GLA250, and 2 feet
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 3,498
Thanks: 197
Thanked 250 Times in 159 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
Dark I think you should hold off on that conclusion until independent tests are done, there are quite a few factors in the BRZ/FRS's favor such as ~6% less weight, RWD, not to mention that the gears seem too short to hit 60, which means the acceleration under 60 will actually feel stronger...The ft-lb number doesn't mean squat, what's important is that the Hondas don't have a torque dead zone below 3000 while the BRZ does, but a mild launch will take care of that disadvantage.
That's why I said "probably". However, this generation Si really produces more power than the old one. It has grown a bit though.
__________________
Dark
Dark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 12:32 AM   #12
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Oh snap I just realized the Si loses breath pretty fast at the top of its rev range (200hp at 7000...wtf?), so its off the line acceleration is very high. I guess it's probably a close call then.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 01:19 AM   #13
Maxim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: 2010 GTI 2dr Tornado Red
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Based on the nearly 200lb weight difference between the cars, and the fact that the BRZ/FR-S is RWD and will actually put the power down in 1st gear, I'd say no contest. BRZ/FR-S will probably be marginally faster in every respect except maybe top-gear acceleration. It will certainly be faster on a track, especially if you put the same tires on both cars.

On a prepared drag-strip, they'll likely be very close, but in real world conditions, where traction is more limited and road conditions aren't perfect, the RWD layout is going to give a massive advantage to the BRZ/FR-S off the line. I've got a high-powered FWD car....launching it is a huge pain in the ass.
__________________
Maxim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 01:26 AM   #14
Capt Canuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: BMW E36 323is
Location: Bay Area, NorCal
Posts: 685
Thanks: 47
Thanked 72 Times in 42 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I guess we'll see in 2013 Lightning Laps how it does in comparison:
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...1-class-page-3

Obviously different weather and drivers skewer any real direct comparison, but be interesting to see nevertheless.
__________________
Capt Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
civic, civic si, honda


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why are Civic owners such tools? LexusFman Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 29 11-28-2011 06:20 PM
AutoExpressUK: Honda Civic Type R is back quik1987 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 36 10-18-2011 01:15 PM
CR says Civic is a loser. 1660 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 9 08-02-2011 12:44 PM
2012 Honda civic VenomRush Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 38 05-17-2011 04:26 PM
1995 Honda Civic DX - Brake Lights Siriusly.Andrew Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 7 02-18-2011 07:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.