View Single Post
Old 10-13-2019, 12:11 AM   #15
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mswbrz View Post
So many peeps salty bout the Ace being heads above the rest ..... thanks again for the validation of me buying the right header/ tune for my Fi brz


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not salty.

I do take a suppliers "findings" with a grain of salt though.

The ACE header, with it's EL design should see better performance over any UEL header in an NA application, because physics, as for boosted with the help of blow through, I'm not sure.

Boosted?, I haven't tested that, my AVO runs its UEL.

But talking NA, and supercharged, how much better than the decated OEM is the ACE though, and which ACE, as there are a few different choices.

Whilst the design of the ACE header is spot on, that's alot of money when we don't know the difference it gets to a decated OEM EL header designed by Subaru.

I acknowledge the compromise made to the length of the OEM secondaries due to requirement of the OEM cat.


https://www.counterspacegarage.com/a...0-brz-frs-gt86

$1700USD ( on sale) = $2500AUD = Alot of cash for unkown gain.

What's the difference when you compare red apples to green apples, the ACE vs the EL JDL 4:2:1 with a $100 overpipe (a 2.5" pipe is a 2.5" pipe) > https://www.counterspacegarage.com/jdl-421el-ft86

Cheers.
__________________
Disclaimer: This post represents the official views of the voices in my head at the time of posting.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133311
I'm only here for the biscuits
86MLR is offline   Reply With Quote