View Single Post
Old 07-15-2015, 02:30 AM   #353
Wayno
Senior Member
 
Wayno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 896 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayno View Post
Thought I'd share this here.

So far I've seen the MAF sensor having one of only THREE behaviors in OL on Australian cars with stock intake.

If you wish to ignore CL and use the OTS 2.0 Stg2 petrol MAF scale, then maximizing power in the shortest time possible should simply be a matter of plugging in the correct adjusted MAF scale.

(I say shortest time possible, but this is 6 months worth of going in circles).

TYPE 1
The lucky few who have near perfect AFR's on OTS tune.
No correction required except smoothed MAF scale slightly - 1% leaner at 3.2V, 3.9V and 4.0V.

TYPE 2
Starts going rich after 4.0V MAFV or 6400-6800rpm, right before peak power so it hurts your dyno number.
Corrected with "v77.NT1" MAF scale - 1% leaner at 3.2V, 1% leaner at 3.9V, 3% leaner at 4.0V, 5% leaner after 4.2V.

TYPE 3
Farkin rich all over but extremely rich at 3.2V and after 3.8V MAFV.
Usually accompanied by engine load above 1.3g/rev resulting in a fake lean lump around 6000-6800rpm where it's hitting the load limit. It still makes decent power at 6800, purely by accident and sucks everywhere else.
Corrected with "v76.AT1/v77.AT1" MAF scale - 6% leaner at 3.2V, 4% leaner at 3.9V and 4.0V, 5% leaner at 4.3V.

TYPE 1 Examples:
(MT) 1:
http://datazap.me/u/toy-sooby/3rd-ge...2-3&zoom=0-107
(MT) 2:
http://datazap.me/u/deanveljkovic/86...2749&mark=2713
(MT) 3:
http://datazap.me/u/deanveljkovic/ky...zoom=4149-4280

TYPE 2 Examples:
(MT) 4:
http://datazap.me/u/lipton54321/log-...1060&mark=1022
(MT) 5:
http://datazap.me/u/notrq/custom-ww-...0-462&mark=423

TYPE 3 Examples:
(AT) 6:
http://datazap.me/u/praneetn7/stg-2-...zoom=5263-5359
(AT) 7:
http://datazap.me/u/wayne/206-stg2-u...&zoom=893-1084
(MT) 8:
http://datazap.me/u/ethsgreygts/wayn...&zoom=907-1082
(MT) 9:
http://datazap.me/u/supernom/e85-pul...63&mark=68-112

OTS scales are quite lumpier than stock.




I smoothed the OTS scales for MT, richening up where they're lean on Stg1 and leaning up where they're rich on Stg2.




AT (lumpy again) vs MT (smooth) for petrol.




Smoothed scale vs NT1 for E85 and AT1 for E85.

Wayno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post:
solidONE (07-15-2015), steve99 (07-15-2015)