|
|
#477 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: Toyota GT86 6M/T
Location: Denmark
Posts: 90
Thanks: 59
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() @steve99 , at idle LTFT is usually 0% or sometimes 0.78%, so I guess it would be fine just to leave minimum load at 0.2. I understand that while doing the highway logs I should try to keep the throttle as steady as possible or keep a very mild acceleration between 100 and 140 km/h, but for city driving I can't stop logging for every time I have to stop at a light or need to brake. Is that acceptable? I guess all the irrelevant data will be removed as the ECU goes in too OL on deceleration..? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#478 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,986 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
just drive smooth , mild acceleration, your just trying to get as much closed loop time as possible at varing rpm, just dont drive like racer X and you will be fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#479 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: Toyota GT86 6M/T
Location: Denmark
Posts: 90
Thanks: 59
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Regarding the 15 minutes driving around a car park, would you say that should be with stop & go, or should I try to keep the clutch engaged at all times and just drive around at low rpm in both 1st and 2nd gear? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#480 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,986 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
just do 15 mins or so normal driving then 10 on the highway or open road, or some backroads where you can do 100k or so legally |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | cawith (04-22-2016) |
|
|
#481 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
In addition to that, I always do some closed-loop runs with low load at higher rpms.
Cruise-control driving for a bit of time with 4.0k, 4.5k, 5.0k, 5.5k,6.0k on the highway/autobahn. Very helpful for nailing down your 3v/3.2v maf value, since it should be calibrated in close loop. If you've done this properly, you will have a good base for applying load limits when calibrating open-loop. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to freerunner For This Useful Post: | cawith (04-22-2016) |
|
|
#482 |
|
RWD addicted
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: BRZ 6MT OFT OFH
Location: Moscow
Posts: 130
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
need advice
Guys!
I seem scald my maf as the car drives much better now than before, but: there is the spike of AFR at 3800 rpm. http://datazap.me/u/ondreiko/1007-wot?log=0&data=1-6-11 My load engine table is as follows: 800.0 1000.0 2000.0 2200.0 2400.0 2500.0 3000.0 3800.0 4000.0 1.00000006144 1.00000006144 1.00000006144 1.00000006144 1.07000738996 1.1099854197599999 1.09997565352 0.9500122653999999 1.40002450008 as it was proposed by Wayno. What do you suggest me to do in order to eliminate that spike (FLKC = 0 and IAM = 1 at that point anyway) and do i need it as the car drives very good (comparing to the same before i did MAF scaling). Sorry for bothering stupid questions of the dumb guy, but i seem to be not in charge to find the right way myself at this point and need your kind guidance. It is OFT/OFH setup and front pipe is catless as well Thank you in advance, PS: i've read the entire thread from beginning to the end but still need guidance. sorry again Last edited by Ondreiko; 04-26-2016 at 05:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#483 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Just raise the 3800 value to 1.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Wayno For This Useful Post: | Ondreiko (04-27-2016) |
|
|
#484 |
|
RWD addicted
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: BRZ 6MT OFT OFH
Location: Moscow
Posts: 130
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#485 |
|
RWD addicted
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: BRZ 6MT OFT OFH
Location: Moscow
Posts: 130
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Guys,
Does this one look right now? http://datazap.me/u/ondreiko/v1008-w...=0&data=1-6-11 i changed engine load limits at 3800 RPMs by +0.5 and it looks better now. Should i leave it as is or does it need further tweaking (of what)? Here is another log of the same day, http://datazap.me/u/ondreiko/v1008-w...=1&data=1-6-11 but there was bit less flat surface in second case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#486 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: GT86
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Thanks: 135
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Looks better. Should be safe for now.
If you're certain that your mafv 3.20Via cell has been calibrated correcty in closed-loop, try raising load-limit for 3800 rpm slighly further and see if it gets better. Else adapt scaling value for 3.20V (increase slightly so more fuel is added). This will probably set scaling off for mafv >= 3.44V Make one change a time and examine what happens. Will take some time and trial and error to get everything perfect. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to freerunner For This Useful Post: | Ondreiko (04-29-2016) |
|
|
#488 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Drives: 2016 Scion FR-S
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 155
Thanks: 11
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#489 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,986 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#490 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Drives: 2016 Scion FR-S
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 155
Thanks: 11
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Ah okay thanks. Is there anything else that must be done after scaling the MAF? Also, if I wanted to rescale the MAF again do I load the previous ots rom and log my drive and scale maf or do I use the current rom with the newly scaled MAF and log and adjust that one? Sorry just not sure because one instruction says to log tons and tons of data and repeat while another says just do 15 min normal and 10 highway 2-3 WOT and done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AFR in Closed Loop | Toyota John | Software Tuning | 39 | 07-07-2019 09:26 AM |
| BRZedit Fuel Trims, Closed to Open loop transiton | mad_sb | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 32 | 08-06-2015 04:14 AM |
| Notes on injector / maf scalining using full time open loop | mad_sb | Software Tuning | 40 | 03-03-2014 06:49 PM |
| Screencast: closed loop boost control with RaceRom | jamesm | Software Tuning | 2 | 02-10-2014 03:23 PM |
| Screencast: experimenting with full-time closed loop fueling | jamesm | Software Tuning | 2 | 12-27-2013 11:19 AM |