follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-02-2012, 07:30 PM   #43
OrbitalEllipses
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Attitude
Location: MD
Posts: 10,046
Thanks: 884
Thanked 4,889 Times in 2,902 Posts
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeezNuuuts83 View Post
Contrasting to what we both said, the WRX and STI accelerate pretty similarly. So going with the STI in recent years meant that you were also after the better handling, since it's not as if the difference in punch was as significant as when the standard WRX only had 227 hp to the STi's 300.
People generally prefer the ratios of the 5MT in the WRX as well; the 6MT was harder to street and often felt slower simply due to the larger turbo especially when shifting so often.

In their current guise, the WRX is a damned bargain in comparison. It is, however, an entirely different car when you get down to it.
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 08:10 PM   #44
jkonquer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2005 Subaru STI
Location: Socal
Posts: 418
Thanks: 4
Thanked 73 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yeah in impreza form it was very worth it to wait for sti version. But i really cant see the sti version of brz getting any better unless they throw in a turbo/different internals or wider body
__________________
jkonquer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 08:55 PM   #45
TOMIMOTO
Senior Member
 
TOMIMOTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: MY00 Impreza 2.5RS
Location: NH
Posts: 258
Thanks: 5
Thanked 115 Times in 42 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I've been driving a slow, lightweight corner smasher for the last 6 years. (165hp/165tq 2800lb highly modified Impreza 2.5RS coupe) I'm holding out for an STI.

Actually, not even an STI. I just want forced induction.
TOMIMOTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 01:38 AM   #46
aesthetect
form follows function
 
aesthetect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 240Z, E90 M3, tacorunner
Location: alabama
Posts: 51
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^ same hi from rs25.com lol although coming from the RS, forced induction is the one thing i still dont really want ...but ill take it if the rest of the package matches what i want - light, fun and efficient.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tripjammer View Post
Also in 2015 there will be some other cars...A next generation Z, a possible Supra, and maybe even a 2.0 liter turbo flat 4 porsche...
whats this about a 2.0 flat 4 turbo porsche..?? link please? (edit, nevermind, googled it, that seems to be about the extent of whats known so far haha; doubl edit: 356 Speedster?)

the Z, or whatever comes out of the nissan stable, is definitely something to keep an eye on. as well as the BMW 2 series.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkonquer View Post
Yeah in impreza form it was very worth it to wait for sti version. But i really cant see the sti version of brz getting any better unless they throw in a turbo/different internals or wider body
i dont necessarily agree, but i just cant imagine anything theyre going to do to the BRZ that wouldnt just be a bolt on. the beef of an STi (compared to wrx) is in the trans (stronger, more gears, front diff, better rear diff, etc) plus a slightly better engine, then struts/springs/sway bars. the BRZ obv only has one differential (easy to replace/aftermarket) and already a 6 spd (unless they really bump up hp, ie turbo, no reason to change) thus all the stuff i see is likely to be bolt ons.

a part of me kinda hopes for a CSL version that loses some creature comforts, has the bolt ons youd expect, plus some lightweight carbon fiber bits (maybe even replacing some heavyduty structural pieces) ... hard to tell where that model would fall price wise though. be cool if they did the bare bones thing and didnt charge much more.

Last edited by aesthetect; 05-03-2012 at 09:38 AM.
aesthetect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 01:46 AM   #47
DeeezNuuuts83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2006 Evo IX SE
Location: Southern California
Posts: 997
Thanks: 115
Thanked 254 Times in 170 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aesthetect View Post
whats this about a 2.0 flat 4 turbo porsche..?? link please?
There are rumors of them using one (except I read it was a 2.5-liter flat-four, expected to have 300-350 hp) in either the Boxster or the Cayman or both. I can't remember exactly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aesthetect View Post
i dont necessarily agree, but i just cant imagine anything theyre going to do to the BRZ that wouldnt just be a bolt on. the beef of an STi is in the trans (stronger, more gears, front diff, better rear diff, etc) plus a slightly better engine, then struts/springs/sway bars. the BRZ obv only has one differential (easy to replace/aftermarket) and already a 6 spd (unless they really bump up hp, ie turbo, no reason to change) thus all the stuff i see is likely to be bolt ons.
I get your argument, but an STI variant of the BRZ would be useless if it were just bolt-on stuff. I'd assume that the interals of the engine would also be updated (as opposed to it just being the exact same motor with a turbo), a few more spot welds on the chassis to help with rigidity (even though most reports say that the FR-S/BRZ seems like it can handle a lot more than the 200 hp it comes with) and maybe some new body panels, whether aluminum or just shaped differently (like widebody fenders to house wider tracks)... or both. I'd guess the steering might be a hair quicker.
DeeezNuuuts83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 02:15 AM   #48
aesthetect
form follows function
 
aesthetect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 240Z, E90 M3, tacorunner
Location: alabama
Posts: 51
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeezNuuuts83 View Post
There are rumors of them using one (except I read it was a 2.5-liter flat-four, expected to have 300-350 hp) in either the Boxster or the Cayman or both. I can't remember exactly.
yeah, looks like theyre talking about a new entry level model to use it as well, something reminiscent of the 550 which i take to mean COG low as shit. very cool though, hope its not too boxstery/bitchass.

Quote:
I get your argument, but an STI variant of the BRZ would be useless if it were just bolt-on stuff. I'd assume that the interals of the engine would also be updated (as opposed to it just being the exact same motor with a turbo), a few more spot welds on the chassis to help with rigidity (even though most reports say that the FR-S/BRZ seems like it can handle a lot more than the 200 hp it comes with) and maybe some new body panels, whether aluminum or just shaped differently (like widebody fenders to house wider tracks)... or both. I'd guess the steering might be a hair quicker.
yeah that the sti version being all bolt ons would be worthless is what i meant to say as my main point, sorry, guess that wasn't very clear haha.

i still dont really think (<-- key word, nobody knows) itll have a turbo, but they do need to increase power output, undoubtedly. i recall an interview with one of the engineers mentioning itd be ready for higher revs with just some stiffer valve springs so thats kind of what i have in mind. but obv the midrange is where its needing some help so raising redline alone isnt really going to solve all those problems.

that being said, the forward facing throttle body and existence of front mount turbos on very similar subaru motors, is extremely suggestive of a turbo version.

i think itll basically come down to once they start testing stuff out, if they can get the power level they want in NA, i bet they do it, otherwise i bet it goes turbo.
aesthetect is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
North America to get Subaru version but not Toyota version? Ground N Pound BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 42 05-29-2014 01:23 AM
New hot version 4agze Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 19 03-07-2012 10:08 PM
Do you think we are going to see a trd version or 5axis version of the FRS next week DIG1992 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 9 01-04-2012 07:59 AM
HOT VERSION RETURNS!!!! WingsofWar Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 15 11-21-2011 05:21 AM
Hello? are you Subaru version of FT-86? Dark BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 89 01-20-2011 08:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.