Official: Toyota FT-1 Concept / First New Supra Prototype Spotted!

[NemesisPrime909]

right as much as I like it.

i can't wait to see the more streamlined production version.

now as long as it doesn't tread GTR territory in price....

[tinma]

not sure if this video was posted or not yet, but here it is!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GO0T-eb1jrI&feature=share"]Toyota FT-1 Concept! The Next Supra? - The Downshift Ep. 73 - YouTube[/ame]

[Shin]

Gonna be available to drive in GT6 Tomorrow! ~

http://www.gtplanet.net/toyota-ft-1-...h-as-free-dlc/

[Hanni_0176]

I was just about to turn on GT6 to check, lol. Guess I'll wait till tomorrow, then.

[Guff]

Time to go on Supraforums and see how they are handling the news...

[EmeraldMalta]

Regarding the powertrain it is highly logical to use the 400hp 3.5l V6 hybrid in the FT-HS. I think it is the most suitable powertrain for the flagship... and bdw I would hate to see a Bmw I6 in the new toyota flagship...

[Veloist]

We have also seen elements of that nose+front fascia on the NS4 concept, which probably indicates the direction of Toyota's corporate design language.

What does this mean for us 86 fans?

If Toyota redesigns the 86/FR-S as a refresh or a 2nd generation, it will probably incorporate that nose.

[Bristecom]

I'm glad to see them supporting a new sports car but this is nothing but a drawn up concept with little to no actual performance aspects in mind. I very much dislike this type of designing as it practically never translates to the real world production vehicles so it's completely pointless.

I say start with the underlying drivetrain and suspension specs first, then let the body be formed by aerodynamic and safety structure testing, then design a functional interior, then make some minor cosmetic tweaks to give it more style.

But even the styling, which is the sole purpose of this concept, is a bit too daft and over the top for me. IMO, Toyota is better off ignoring this concept and letting the real Japanese and German TMG engineers and designers handle the project.

[Bristecom]

Originally Posted by Veloist

We have also seen elements of that nose+front fascia on the NS4 concept, which probably indicates the direction of Toyota's corporate design language.

What does this mean for us 86 fans?

If Toyota redesigns the 86/FR-S as a refresh or a 2nd generate, it will probably incorporate that nose.

They better not make the 2015 or 2016 refresh look anything like that.

The 86/FR-S looks nearly perfect as it does now, IMO.

[vh_supra26]

Akio's Assault Vehicle: Futuristic Sports Car Melds F1 Influences With Supra Styling

Click here to view 120 High Resolution Photos

A pencil tip moves across a sheet of paper, leaving a thin graphite line. Perhaps a millimeter across, it could be swiftly erased. Or it could become the spark for the greatest performance cars that have ever existed: perhaps Marcello Gandini's 1966 Lamborghini Miura. Or Jean Bugatti's 1937 Type 57 SC Atlantic Coupe. Very different designs, but both born of a mere line arcing across paper.

For Alex Shen, studio chief designer at Toyota's Calty Design Research in Newport Beach, California, the words describing the sports car's styling concept came first -- words like "sexy," "honest," "organic," "kick-ass." Followed by proportions -- front/mid-engine, rear drive, just the right scale. And a wild guess at price -- maybe $60,000? "It's a Toyota," says Shen. "It ought to be affordable." Only then did lines start to appear.

But when they did, it was an avalanche. Virtually every designer in the 65-person studio submitted sketches, hundreds of them, many drawn at night, some sketched on lunchtime napkins, altogether exploding the number of lines Calty's president, Kevin Hunter, and Shen's team slowly culled for the very best ideas. At least the hurricane of lines that would become their sports car was now just a flurry.

Let me back up here. Usually, when people draw cars, they're actually creating an outline, which in drawing parlance is a contour line -- delineating the "contour" between the positive space (the car) and the negative space (the emptiness around it). In the realm of car designers, the language differs; for them, the line's a "silhouette." A contour is applied across a surface to understand its shape. For Shen, though, it would be a challenge for his silhouette not to recall that of the Mark

The canted roofline creates visual stress without unbalancing the overall shape.

4 Toyota Supra. It's iconic: a long, melted nose, abrupt windshield rise, tight roof peak, and lengthy plunge to a mini ducktail flip. And it was a line Shen and his colleagues simultaneously embraced and struggled to resist. Their task was to create a Toyota sports car for the future, a point emphasized by its eventual name, "FT-1" -- for Future Toyota-One -- which recalls their stillborn 2007 FT-HS project and parallels Lexus' "LF" (Lexus Future) naming scheme. The FT-1, set to debut at the North America International Auto Show, is not a "real car," but a "concept car" -- a three-dimensional frenzy of winks and side glances, sucking scoops, and brutal downforce-generators, all peeking at us from behind a curtain where the future is being created. It's the essence of a potent potential new sports car that's for now an instant of bodywork turbulence, shock-frozen in fiberglass.

When Calty pitched its plan to Toyota's Nagoya headquarters, its timing couldn't have been better. At the 2011 Tokyo auto show, Akio Toyoda had insisted, "Now we have a new slogan, 'Fun To Drive Again.'" And he'd made no secret of wanting a Supra-like car restored to the lineup. Calty was wise to the pitfalls, too, having been down this particular road five years earlier with its hybrid-drive, Supra-esque FT-HS, a car stillborn during the freefall of the great recession. But with the world economy healing and Toyota's helm in the hands of a guy who'd donned a helmet to drive in the Nürburgring 24-hour race, the starter button was firmly pushed. With Akio's blessing, Calty's in-house Supra-esque sports car got the green light to become a concept car to be judged by the world. A timeline was plotted, milestones marked. The team set to work.

Unlike the Supra, the FT-1 has racing fingerprints all over it. The wind is shat- tered by a prow dominated by a Formula 1-inspired beak. Consequently, the radia- tor's air is divided between twin shark-like mouths, each stuffed with electric fans sitting atop angled splitters whose shape is repeated higher up via streaking light signatures that fishhook around intense, triple-LED headlights.

Moving aft, its flanks are deeply slashed by even more air intakes that are themselves subsequently engulfed by rising rocker panels that suddenly erupt into muscular rear wheel arches. The roof is a sort of double-bubble, and the frenzy stays nonstop all the way to a tail that reminds you of a prototype sports racing car's, complete with Venturi tunnel openings, a dense array of 35 tiny LED foglights, extendable wing, and twin storm- drain exhausts. None of this is by accident. During the FT-1's gestation, Calty (involved in shaping Toyota's Camry NASCAR racer) frequently consulted nearby Toyota Racing Development to ensure its shape was consistent with a sports car's engineering demands. The result is called "functional sculpting."

Red, which emphasizes highlights, was the only color ever considered.

Classic "silhouette cars" -- ones you'd be inclined to draw in outline -- are typically relaxed, simple fuselage forms that tran- quilly speak to you through their broad pools of subtly reflected light. Think of the soft, slightly balloon-ish shapes from the '50s and '60s -- a particularly good example for me being the Lancia Aurelia B20.On the other hand, "gesture" in drawing puts an emphasis on the action and vitality. A good (or bad) example of gesture is the 1984 Ferrari Testarossa, a very, very busy design. Draw it, and your pencil becomes animated trying to capture the long strakes across its mammoth side-radiator gills. Recently, this sort of hyperactive, big-sculpture automotive design seems to be reemerging: the new Corvette, anyone? The FT-1's extreme gesture mixes positive and negative space even more turbulently; somehow, it's both windswept and forward-leaning.

http://www.motortrend.com/future/con...pt_first_look/

[vh_supra26]

Originally Posted by Bristecom

I'm glad to see them supporting a new sports car but this is nothing but a drawn up concept with little to no actual performance aspects in mind. I very much dislike this type of designing as it practically never translates to the real world production vehicles so it's completely pointless.

I say start with the underlying drivetrain and suspension specs first, then let the body be formed by aerodynamic and safety structure testing, then design a functional interior, then make some minor cosmetic tweaks to give it more style.

But even the styling, which is the sole purpose of this concept, is a bit too daft and over the top for me. IMO, Toyota is better off ignoring this concept and letting the real Japanese and German TMG engineers and designers handle the project.

Lol, everyone on Supraforum is in love with this concept.

I guess to each his own...

[kuhlka]

http://www.autonews.com/article/2014...#axzz2qHqhvrN4

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/...troit/4453239/

Uhhh... wtf?





The front and rear look bizarre, but the side profile is really nice.

[vividracing]

Looks like a mix of a Viper, FR-S, and a Corvette.

[Bristecom]

Originally Posted by vh_supra26

Lol, everyone on Supraforum is in love with this concept.

I guess to each his own...

I mean, my first reaction was excitement but after watching it drive around in a few videos, it definitely looks too strange. It's fine if it ends up looking somewhat like this but again, I say let the wind tunnel and performance aspects tune the basic shape, and then make cosmetic tweaks from there.