follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
86WORX
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


View Poll Results: Which off-the-shelf FI kit would you like to see CSG test?
Vortech Complete system 26 13.07%
Innovate Stage 2 Complete 98 49.25%
Jackson Racing Factory Tuned 36 18.09%
Kraftwerks Fully Tuned 39 19.60%
Voters: 199. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-30-2013, 05:37 PM   #71
phloozy
Senior Member
 
phloozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Scion FR-S
Location: United States
Posts: 743
Thanks: 46
Thanked 397 Times in 211 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezoris View Post
Because the Innovate kit was released half baked at a low price point to sell as many as possible. Mission accomplished. That was their sales model. It's not track-able out of the box and it won't run in all conditions. Specifically on 91 octane in the heat without issues with tip in knock and plenty of timing retard and heat soak. Talked to owners, tuners, seen first hand.

Thats why they are working hard with guys like nameless and other vendors to release add ons like the IAT kits and IC kits. It's become a modular kit. Innovate started the hyperbole, by saying IC is not needed and heat was not an issue but never provided any proof or testing. Despite it being well known they had issues with their own car on 91. These guys are out to sell product for as cheap as possible and give very little back to the community in terms of data and info. But has unbelievable fan boys behind them, I don't get it.

Now that they release an IC months later, you guys still want to support them and not the new players to the market who actually have some track testing and race background instead?

Innovate blew their chance, let Jackson and Kraftwerks get a shot at the press from CSG who will actually test the kit out of the box.
I find it strange that whenever the word Innovate is spoken you magically show up to discuss how terrible the kit is. We heard your opinion like 12 times now (I am sure I missed a few other times). We get it, they arent transparent, it heat soaks on 91 gas, you heard it from tuners and other users, and it isn't track ready. Why do you feel the need to say this EVERY time?

I hate to break it to you but there are a lot of us who are VERY happy with our kits which is why so many people want to see what a reputable shop can do with it. I for one am more than happy to save $1,000 for the option of a non IC solution and running e85.
__________________
phloozy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 06:01 PM   #72
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,867 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezoris View Post
Because the Innovate kit was released half baked at a low price point to sell as many as possible. Mission accomplished. That was their sales model. It's not track-able out of the box and it won't run in all conditions. Specifically on 91 octane in the heat without issues with tip in knock and plenty of timing retard and heat soak. Talked to owners, tuners, seen first hand.

Thats why they are working hard with guys like nameless and other vendors to release add ons like the IAT kits and IC kits. It's become a modular kit. Innovate started the hyperbole, by saying IC is not needed and heat was not an issue but never provided any proof or testing. Despite it being well known they had issues with their own car on 91. These guys are out to sell product for as cheap as possible and give very little back to the community in terms of data and info. But has unbelievable fan boys behind them, I don't get it.

Now that they release an IC months later, you guys still want to support them and not the new players to the market who actually have some track testing and race background instead?

Innovate blew their chance, let Jackson and Kraftwerks get a shot at the press from CSG who will actually test the kit out of the box.
Ya know, I actually agree with alot of this. They don't communicate well HERE. They did release a product that, IMHO, wasn't ready for public consumption without an intercooler. And they did advertise peak power only slightly higher then what Fenton is seeing with an electrical SC or 2forme made with E85. Who fuckin cares?! I want to see if the claims of the amazing torque curve are real. I want an educated opinion on which setup is faster on track and which is more enjoyable to drive on the street. And I want to hear the horror stories about being stranded because it threw a belt or the kit wasn't as complete as was advertised. I don't give a shit about Innovate or their practises, I'm here reading and interacting where I can, to make an informed buying decision.

Something else to consider, Innovate is just a distributor. A middle man between the actual dealers and the manufacturer. They may have commissioned a tuner or two to make the car work with NA gas, but that's about it.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post:
fenton (10-30-2013), OICU812 (10-31-2013), sw20kosh (10-30-2013), xjohnx (10-30-2013)
Old 10-30-2013, 06:37 PM   #73
calispec
Senior Member
 
calispec's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Subaru BRZ with Delicious Innovate
Location: Cleveland OH
Posts: 194
Thanks: 81
Thanked 106 Times in 63 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I would like to point out that jackson racing also has done a PD blower.. for the honda engines. A roots style which we all know is less efficient than a twin screw. Jackson Racing NEVER released an intercooler for that setup. There is one out there that uses laminova cores but my point is I don't believe Jackson Racing ever intended to cool the charge. People were seeing CRAZY high IAT's. Should that kit have ever been released? YES. Would I track it? NO. I own one!! I have the Innovate on my car now. Non intercooled. I installed it late in the season because I do NOT want to track it without an intercooler. I will have all winter to workout any issues (so far none other than tuner choice Delicious is FANTASTIC) and install the intercooler before track season is here again. You WILL see allllll sorts of data from me when that day comes. The stage 1 kit is PERFECTLY FINE for daily driving IMHO. Also if you would like more information try giving innovate a call. They talked to me for a half hour and gave me a lot if information. No numbers but a lot of good info. Bottom like is there is some information that a LOT of people would like to see on this kit. Unbiast. That is why I want to see this kit tested. I LOVE the Innovate kit!! And it is right out of the box. Yes there is room for improvement if you plan on tracking it. I will track it so I am going the extra step and getting the needed parts which INNOVATE PROVIDES BUT IS NOT NEEDED for the average customer.

Also. If you plan on tracking this car without an oil cooler you are crazy. If you track this thing with out an oil cooler after it's supercharged you are insane. Should every company sell an oil cooler with their kit because it is necessary to drive it on a track?????? There isn't a single kit sold that is truly "track ready"!!!!!!
calispec is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to calispec For This Useful Post:
Dezoris (10-30-2013), PStaff716 (11-01-2013), sw20kosh (10-31-2013), xjohnx (10-30-2013)
Old 10-31-2013, 02:03 AM   #74
PoWn3d_0704
Senior Member
 
PoWn3d_0704's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 1990 BNR32 GTR
Location: Junction City, Oregon
Posts: 369
Thanks: 104
Thanked 57 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I would love to see the Innovate stage 2 put through its paces... It is what I would go for, since I'm not looking for crazy HP, just enough to put the car where she belongs. (Sub 300 HP)

Seeing what all really has to be done to do it right would really help guys like me who aren't hanging on every word of every member on the forums. I think the Twin Screw is great for all around driving and tracking. So I want to see numbers/cost/headache that goes into making it bulletproof so I can do the same to my car. I want FI, but I dont want a garage queen or dyno bitch either.
__________________
Picked up my BRZ on 6/11/13.

Build Album:
PoWn3d's BRZ Pictures

Build Thread: PoWn3d's BRZ
PoWn3d_0704 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PoWn3d_0704 For This Useful Post:
xjohnx (10-31-2013)
Old 12-18-2013, 10:45 AM   #75
choi0706
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: t
Location: United States
Posts: 446
Thanks: 14
Thanked 56 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
any update on testing?
choi0706 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 12:45 PM   #76
King Tut
NASA SpecE30 Racer
 
King Tut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2006 Honda S2000
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 7,279
Thanks: 607
Thanked 5,759 Times in 3,055 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
Tagged: 10 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to King Tut
Quote:
Originally Posted by choi0706 View Post
any update on testing?
They are about to take delivery of their new car and then it is getting the Jackson Racing supercharger is my understanding.
__________________
King Tut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 12:53 PM   #77
Ralph Spoilsport
Senior Member
 
Ralph Spoilsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ, WRB
Location: Galt's Gulch, NH
Posts: 225
Thanks: 107
Thanked 207 Times in 93 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I voted Innovate. Looking harder at Jackson right now... looks like you guys are ahead of me on that one.
Ralph Spoilsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:26 PM   #78
jamesm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 1,166
Thanked 2,293 Times in 1,180 Posts
Mentioned: 313 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
if i were looking to pick up a supercharger setup today it'd be kraftwerks no question about it. the toothed, separated belt is the reason. after all the problems i've heard of people having with belts, i would want the insurance of being able to limp home if i throw the sc belt.

but really i'd just buy a turbo, because turbos are better
jamesm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:44 PM   #79
Ralph Spoilsport
Senior Member
 
Ralph Spoilsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ, WRB
Location: Galt's Gulch, NH
Posts: 225
Thanks: 107
Thanked 207 Times in 93 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesm View Post
but really i'd just buy a turbo, because turbos are better

lol, there's that.
Ralph Spoilsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 03:53 PM   #80
Victor Draken
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: Toyota Gt86
Location: Italy
Posts: 370
Thanks: 119
Thanked 61 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesm View Post
if i were looking to pick up a supercharger setup today it'd be kraftwerks no question about it. the toothed, separated belt is the reason. after all the problems i've heard of people having with belts, i would want the insurance of being able to limp home if i throw the sc belt.

but really i'd just buy a turbo, because turbos are better
power delivery is not the same plus complexity.
__________________
Victor Draken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 03:58 PM   #81
jamesm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 1,166
Thanked 2,293 Times in 1,180 Posts
Mentioned: 313 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor Draken View Post
power delivery is not the same plus complexity.
i know.
jamesm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 04:47 PM   #82
Victor Draken
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: Toyota Gt86
Location: Italy
Posts: 370
Thanks: 119
Thanked 61 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesm View Post
i know.
Probably I didn't get the irony behind your post about turbo is better
__________________
Victor Draken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 04:49 PM   #83
jamesm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 1,166
Thanked 2,293 Times in 1,180 Posts
Mentioned: 313 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor Draken View Post
Probably I didn't get the irony behind your post about turbo is better
i was poking fun at the topic... because in the other thread we were talking about how all of the s/c guys are switching to turbos now.
jamesm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 05:56 PM   #84
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
just twin charge and have both............... jeez
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sw20kosh For This Useful Post:
OrbitalEllipses (12-18-2013), SKELLINGTON (12-18-2013)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brake Fluid shelf life? VoiD Mechanical Maintenance (Oil, Fluids, Break-In, Servicing) 2 08-02-2013 07:17 PM
HKS SUPERCHARGERS ON THE SHELF! 3 AVAILABLE SCIONPRO D2BD Motorwerks Forced Induction 7 07-01-2013 02:45 PM
Greddy Intakes and EVo 3 Exhausts on the shelf! D2BD Motorwerks Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 1 01-31-2013 10:27 AM
Enjuku Racing - Tein S-Tech Springs - ** ON THE SHELF ** Enjuku Racing Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 0 08-14-2012 06:06 PM
Enjuku Racing - KW Variant 3 Coilovers - * ON THE SHELF * Enjuku Racing Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 0 05-25-2012 04:25 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.