Data Logs! Post them here.

[HLHachiRoku]

My new tune I finally finished putting together. Based off stage 2 91 uel, with help form @steve99 and @Wayno messages, posts and how to's. (still needs work(possibly), but need to put way more miles on it and logs. For now its running great! Performance mods (perrin drop in filter, jdl uel header/op) so far(custom catback, but that doesn't add performance imo)

WOT run, seeing some flkc, but nothing below 0.65 and only 1 flbk that wasn't bad at all. (seems to be in certain rpms, but car didn't feel any hesitation while getting on it) The car has way more pull, adv mult stayed at 1. Its only 88 out today, windy. AFR vs commanded seems decently close as well, yes?

http://www.datazap.me/u/hlhachiroku/...1-5-8-11-12-13

Here is a cruising log, small light pulls till ~6k. No flbk, or flkc to report! Again AFR vs commanded is decently close, yes?

http://www.datazap.me/u/hlhachiroku/...1-5-8-11-12-13

Again I need to log and log and drive miles on it to get it in its happy place if it so needs it. I'm happy with the results so far, atleast 2nd to 4th gear run felt super strong. I could only imagine what it would be like with a turbo etc done to it, lol

Thanks again for all the help!

[Dru670]

Aight guys tonight I did a test run back to back comparing the new OFH Stg 2 UEL 91 Tune vs OTS Stg 2 UEL 91 Tune driving the same route (round trip) doing one 3rd gear pull on the on-ramp and cruise back home. I live in Las Vegas and only run 91 oct (current tank is on Chevron 91). Shiv doesn't recommend the new OFH tune if you in CA, NV and AZ btw, just wanted to see how this OFH specific tune performs on my 1320 UEL header compared the the base OTS stg 2 tune in the current conditions.
So, just wondering if you guys can tell me which tune seems better for my car...atleast for this night's test. I'm guessing Shiv's new OFH tune is not recommend for our Vegas heat.

Both logs in this link

http://www.datazap.me/u/dru670/ofh-s...og=1&data=5-13

[phrosty]

Originally Posted by Dru670

Shiv doesn't recommend the new OFH tune if you in CA, NV and AZ btw...I'm guessing Shiv's new OFH tune is not recommend for our Vegas heat.

Nothing to do with heat. It needs high-quality gas.

[Dru670]

Originally Posted by phrosty

Nothing to do with heat. It needs high-quality gas.

So in these logs the the OTS runs better than the OFH tune on our crappy gas?

[Dru670]

question when tuning for knock correction do I retard timing if there is knock even if the IAM remained at 1 when it knocked or only when IAM drops that's when I can retarted timing in the ignition base B?

[steve99]

Originally Posted by Dru670

question when tuning for knock correction do I retard timing if there is knock even if the IAM remained at 1 when it knocked or only when IAM drops that's when I can retarted timing in the ignition base B?

if iam is solid at one , dont start pulling timing all over the place only look at pulling timing if your getting consistent knock in an rpm\load area over -1 in magnitude.

if it runns fine in cooler temps and only getting a bit og knock with hotter intake temps then look towards the iat compensation tables rarther than pulling timing from Base Timing B.

Yous should look at waynos timing tables he has smoothed the lumps and bumps just doing that can stop knock , note you have to look at base B and Knock correction MaxA togeater as they get added to form base ignition timing.

[Dru670]

Originally Posted by steve99

if iam is solid at one , dont start pulling timing all over the place only look at pulling timing if your getting consistent knock in an rpm\load area over -1 in magnitude.

if it runns fine in cooler temps and only getting a bit og knock with hotter intake temps then look towards the iat compensation tables rarther than pulling timing from Base Timing B.

Yous should look at waynos timing tables he has smoothed the lumps and bumps just doing that can stop knock , note you have to look at base B and Knock correction MaxA togeater as they get added to form base ignition timing.

Oh okay thanks.

[HLHachiRoku]

Originally Posted by steve99

if iam is solid at one , dont start pulling timing all over the place only look at pulling timing if your getting consistent knock in an rpm\load area over -1 in magnitude.

if it runns fine in cooler temps and only getting a bit og knock with hotter intake temps then look towards the iat compensation tables rarther than pulling timing from Base Timing B.

Yous should look at waynos timing tables he has smoothed the lumps and bumps just doing that can stop knock , note you have to look at base B and Knock correction MaxA togeater as they get added to form base ignition timing.

@steve99
What if the knoc is coming from going from cl to ol? What table/tables should I look at? I dont see any differences in mine verse waynos in the cl/op section =( iam is staying at 0.96 atm, but the transition is getting some knock and dropping the iam a tad each time

[steve99]

Originally Posted by HLHachiRoku

@steve99
What if the knoc is coming from going from cl to ol? What table/tables should I look at? I dont see any differences in mine verse waynos in the cl/op section =( iam is staying at 0.96 atm, but the transition is getting some knock and dropping the iam a tad each time

Have a look at afr vs commanded afr, you might be getting a lean condition on transition from cl\ol, might need to adjust load limits see waynos guide

[Wayno]

Originally Posted by HLHachiRoku

@steve99
What if the knoc is coming from going from cl to ol? What table/tables should I look at? I dont see any differences in mine verse waynos in the cl/op section =( iam is staying at 0.96 atm, but the transition is getting some knock and dropping the iam a tad each time

You can copy my cl fuel comp tables or you can do like kn does and remove the delays. The delays are there so the ecu can learn fuel trims.

[HLHachiRoku]

Originally Posted by Wayno

You can copy my cl fuel comp tables or you can do like kn does and remove the delays. The delays are there so the ecu can learn fuel trims.

So the tables are already the same as I double checked @Wayno. Id rather not disable as it should be there since its there imo.
Thanks again!
@steve99 on waynos guide it says out dated on it as far as the load and axis numbers. Can this still apply? It is running leaner on the transition over and the timing dips down too I noticed.

[Wayno]

The latest maps are always in the examples thread, not the guide.

Originally Posted by HLHachiRoku

So the tables are already the same as I double checked @Wayno. Id rather not disable as it should be there since its there imo.
Thanks again!
@steve99 on waynos guide it says out dated on it as far as the load and axis numbers. Can this still apply? It is running leaner on the transition over and the timing dips down too I noticed.

[HLHachiRoku]

Originally Posted by Wayno

The latest maps are always in the examples thread, not the guide.

Sorry @Wayno, I ment examples thread, it says (out of date) for the load limits, and in the tune 98 uel rich or tomei 98 uel rich these tables dont exsist, ive tried loading them alone with the correct definition but dont see that table. Im probably doing something wrong =( thank you!

[Dru670]

Both the examples and guide thread say out of date.