follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2012, 09:18 AM   #15
ChrisH
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: Car
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 63
Thanks: 18
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AIRMAX View Post
+1


A 1000kg (sub 1 ton car) would mean plenty of carbon fiber parts, aluminum chassis etc. In today's safety requirements its almost impossible to make a MASS produce cheap 1 ton car...


Civic late 90s Type R, did it (920kg), but that would FAIL safety standards today... heck my MR2 SW20 would also fail.... I mean have you guys seen crash photos of MR2s??.... frontal crash = 50% compression of the car, most likely the engine bay and Rear Half would be structurally identifiable, but the front half would be compressed to a pancake.
This is probably the point: Mass production!

For little series car a lot is possible: 800 kg, the Ginetta G40R - the only real competition for the GT86/BRZ
But not sure, if ever available in LHD, and very small production numers.
[u2b]LiqFGZuKtXU[/u2b]
ChrisH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012, 09:43 AM   #16
Laika
When In Doubt...
 
Laika's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Slowww
Location: PA215
Posts: 1,844
Thanks: 1,023
Thanked 752 Times in 412 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AIRMAX View Post
+1


A 1000kg (sub 1 ton car) would mean plenty of carbon fiber parts, aluminum chassis etc. In today's safety requirements its almost impossible to make a MASS produce cheap 1 ton car...


Civic late 90s Type R, did it (920kg), but that would FAIL safety standards today... heck my MR2 SW20 would also fail.... I mean have you guys seen crash photos of MR2s??.... frontal crash = 50% compression of the car, most likely the engine bay and Rear Half would be structurally identifiable, but the front half would be compressed to a pancake.

I had an SW20. Wasn't it purposely designed to compress that way to protect the ****pit? I know many cars are meant to be more or less totaled during a major collision in order to keep the occupants safe.

Not something I'm sure about with the SW20, just venturing a guess. And if I'm wrong I sure am glad I don't own that anymore.
__________________

Join the Galaxy Blue Silica BRZ registry below:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...2c&usp=sharing
Laika is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone AE86 owners here? Can FT86 improve on AE86? Kenji Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 31 05-17-2014 03:52 PM
An entry level FR revival? aliphian Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 9 11-14-2011 09:09 PM
Rumors are Audi R4 will be a FR-S competitor zigzagz94 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 14 06-22-2010 02:07 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.