follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
86WORX
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting

Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting What these cars were built for!


User Tag List
Sam Strano

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-17-2014, 11:58 AM   #673
G_Ride
Senior Member
 
G_Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Some kind of Subaru
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 768
Thanks: 276
Thanked 257 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I have a question that hopefully someone here can help me with. My region had their second event yesterday and there was a Porsche 968 that was outright decimating CS. He said he had a 968 clubsport, which never came here, but he could just have the M030 suspension packge and doesn't know better. He's never ran with SCCA. From what I found the M030 package comes with adjustable height suspension, at least the front struts are height adjustable. The rear shocks on this guy's car were height adjustable (KW's from what I could tell and with stock looking springs), but does anyone know if the rear shocks were height adjustable on the M030 package?
G_Ride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 01:55 PM   #674
mpicher
Autocross Nut
 
mpicher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Argento 2013 Scion FR-S - MT
Location: Maine
Posts: 117
Thanks: 50
Thanked 36 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
From: http://944turbo.net/?p=277

Included upgraded 30mm front and 25.5mm rear sway bars,
upgraded front inner, outer, and drop link bushings,
improved front castor mounts.
Thicker front anti-roll bar
25.5mm rear torsion bar (a standard 968 option)
Koni shocks, which were height adjustable, and included an adjustment tool.

So if he has KW's that's fine... the m030 package had height adjustable koni's. I wish I had that option on my old '84 944 turbo... was '88 and later.

Even if his car didn't ship with that option and the option was available for that year of the car he could swap in all those parts. The hitch is he'd have to swap in all of it (although he would have one sway bar free to change).
mpicher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 02:08 PM   #675
G_Ride
Senior Member
 
G_Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Some kind of Subaru
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 768
Thanks: 276
Thanked 257 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpicher View Post
From: http://944turbo.net/?p=277

Included upgraded 30mm front and 25.5mm rear sway bars,
upgraded front inner, outer, and drop link bushings,
improved front castor mounts.
Thicker front anti-roll bar
25.5mm rear torsion bar (a standard 968 option)
Koni shocks, which were height adjustable, and included an adjustment tool.

So if he has KW's that's fine... the m030 package had height adjustable koni's. I wish I had that option on my old '84 944 turbo... was '88 and later.

Even if his car didn't ship with that option and the option was available for that year of the car he could swap in all those parts. The hitch is he'd have to swap in all of it (although he would have one sway bar free to change).
I appreciate that. What has me confused though is what another competitor in CS found was this http://www.weissach.net/968_M030-Opt...ocksAndSprings. Based on that, the front struts are height adjustable, but the rears are not?
G_Ride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 02:15 PM   #676
Sccabrz192
Detroit Region, MI
 
Sccabrz192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 13 Volt, 02 WRX
Location: Some Abandoned Slab of Concrete
Posts: 738
Thanks: 20
Thanked 200 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
The adjustable ride height isn't particularly the issue... anyone can use adjustable ride height dampers, as long as the spring seat is dimensionally the same as the OE and it is set to factory ride height with OE legal springs.
__________________
Detroit / NWOR SCCA Member
2005-06: #192 ES 91 MR2 N/A Hardtop
2007-08: #54 STX 05 WRX Sedan
2009-12: #92 BSP/ASP 07 Solstice GXP
2013-14 : #192 CS 13 Subaru BRZ
Sccabrz192 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sccabrz192 For This Useful Post:
G_Ride (02-17-2014)
Old 02-17-2014, 02:16 PM   #677
mpicher
Autocross Nut
 
mpicher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Argento 2013 Scion FR-S - MT
Location: Maine
Posts: 117
Thanks: 50
Thanked 36 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_Ride View Post
I appreciate that. What has me confused though is what another competitor in CS found was this http://www.weissach.net/968_M030-Opt...ocksAndSprings. Based on that, the front struts are height adjustable, but the rears are not?
See this post though from quite a while ago:

http://www.sccaforums.com/forums/aft/26538
mpicher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mpicher For This Useful Post:
G_Ride (02-17-2014)
Old 02-17-2014, 02:29 PM   #678
G_Ride
Senior Member
 
G_Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Some kind of Subaru
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 768
Thanks: 276
Thanked 257 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Thanks for all of the clarication. It threw all of us off since I don't think anyone in CS has seen a 968 or one with the M030 package before, and I have basically have zero knowlegde about Porsches. I wasn't paying attention when he was running, but everyone was telling me the 968 was extremely flat in turns. When I actually took a good look at the car, the -3 degrees of front camber and practically having no fender gap (on 18's with the +/- wheel diameter rule and using the height adjustability), it caught my attention.

Oh well, I guess I'll just need to get faster. A lot faster....
G_Ride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 02:51 PM   #679
Sccabrz192
Detroit Region, MI
 
Sccabrz192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 13 Volt, 02 WRX
Location: Some Abandoned Slab of Concrete
Posts: 738
Thanks: 20
Thanked 200 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
To add to my previous statement... it IS a problem if the package did not include ride height adjustable rears and he has the KWs with the ride height not at the OE setting. That is illegal.
__________________
Detroit / NWOR SCCA Member
2005-06: #192 ES 91 MR2 N/A Hardtop
2007-08: #54 STX 05 WRX Sedan
2009-12: #92 BSP/ASP 07 Solstice GXP
2013-14 : #192 CS 13 Subaru BRZ
Sccabrz192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 04:37 PM   #680
G_Ride
Senior Member
 
G_Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Some kind of Subaru
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 768
Thanks: 276
Thanked 257 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sccabrz192 View Post
To add to my previous statement... it IS a problem if the package did not include ride height adjustable rears and he has the KWs with the ride height not at the OE setting. That is illegal.
I've been told that the rear height is adjusted on those cars by the rear torsion bars. I'm assuming the adjustable collar on the rear is for the spring, which very much like a factory spring. I'll have to talk to the 968 driver next event.
G_Ride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 04:37 PM   #681
TRev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: WI
Posts: 216
Thanks: 31
Thanked 63 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I have been looking into the 964 as I don't see where/how in the rules the turbo model is excluded from CS. Did I miss something?


Also wondering if the factory wide body non-turbo 964 is eligible for CS? I haven't been able to look into it too far but from the looks of it, 18x8.5 front wheels and 18x10.5 rear wheels. That kind of rubber and AWD would be ridiculous.
TRev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 04:48 PM   #682
vroom4
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: East
Posts: 820
Thanks: 18
Thanked 301 Times in 186 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
964 is not listed in appendix A from what I can find, which means it is not eligible for CS.
vroom4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 04:54 PM   #683
TRev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: WI
Posts: 216
Thanks: 31
Thanked 63 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vroom4 View Post
964 is not listed in appendix A from what I can find, which means it is not eligible for CS.


http://scca.cdn.racersites.com/prod/...%20reduced.pdf


Page 168 right below the 968 listing.
TRev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 04:58 PM   #684
vroom4
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: East
Posts: 820
Thanks: 18
Thanked 301 Times in 186 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ahh tricked me by adding a name in front of the number haha.
vroom4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 05:08 PM   #685
G_Ride
Senior Member
 
G_Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Some kind of Subaru
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 768
Thanks: 276
Thanked 257 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
The Porsche 968 with the M030 package gets 17x7.5 fronts and 17x9 rears. They can fit a decent amount of tire underneath. The 968 owner told me can also get up to -3 degrees of front camber on those cars, too.
G_Ride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2014, 06:11 PM   #686
mrazny
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: BMW 135i, soon to BRZ
Location: LZ, IL
Posts: 113
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRev View Post
I have been looking into the 964 as I don't see where/how in the rules the turbo model is excluded from CS. Did I miss something?


Also wondering if the factory wide body non-turbo 964 is eligible for CS? I haven't been able to look into it too far but from the looks of it, 18x8.5 front wheels and 18x10.5 rear wheels. That kind of rubber and AWD would be ridiculous.
Here's why I'd think no on turbo 964...

CStreet lists "Carrera 2 and Carrerra 4 (964 Chassis)"

That only means Carrera's that are 964's, not specifying all 964's. The little bits I've seen only refer to it as "Turbo", not "Carrera Turbo".

There is proof within other categories (no be all end all) that the 964 Turbo is actually called a "911 Turbo (964 chassis)" for the ASP listing.

As to Street, C specifies "911 (non-turbo, NOC)", but oddly there is no 911 NOC anywhere. There's tons of specified 911's, but no other category to catch a 911 964 turbo anywhere. It's an uncaptured car, (and also not currently eligible for National competition).

I have doubts it would be classes in C if asked.
mrazny is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mrazny For This Useful Post:
TRev (02-18-2014)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cinco De Mayo SCCA SOLO Ryeong86 NY / NJ / CT / PA 0 04-23-2013 06:22 PM
Koni Sports in SCCA SOLO Ryeong86 Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 4 04-22-2013 01:58 PM
2013 Preliminary SCCA SOLO and PRO SOLO National Schedule Scooby South Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 13 12-05-2012 09:08 AM
Houston SCCA Solo #9 - 5 FRS, 1 BRZ hankster Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 0 10-09-2012 02:35 PM
SCCA Solo Car Class for the FR-S/BRZ? MrVito Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 31 06-15-2012 11:03 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.