follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
86WORX
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-27-2013, 11:25 AM   #57
Visconti
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 05 STi
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 2,843
Thanks: 196
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,197 Posts
Mentioned: 375 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Visconti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Let's keep the tone professional on both sides please. FWIW I don't think Beerzed's questions are out of line at all and I was not aware that if I used an ECUTek tune, then tried something else to see if the results were different that I wouldn't be able to use the license that I *paid* for already again. Personally I find that type of business practice to be unethical. :shrug: Unless I'm misreading John's reply... This actually makes me question as well whether or not I would run ECUTek and I was planning on getting a tune next month, well that or another set of wheels and tires to compare different sizes at the track.
Youll need proof the license is gone.

Ecutek doesn't save the license when put back to stock.

John
Visconti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 11:33 AM   #58
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visconti View Post
Youll need proof the license is gone.

Ecutek doesn't save the license when put back to stock.

John
But I'm guessing "I felt like trying out the BlahBlah solution to see how the interface was, how it worked, etc" isn't proof though correct? Can the license be saved by the end user and then reflashed to the same ECU after another solution was tested?
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 11:36 AM   #59
Visconti
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 05 STi
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 2,843
Thanks: 196
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,197 Posts
Mentioned: 375 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Visconti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
But I'm guessing "I felt like trying out the BlahBlah solution to see how the interface was, how it worked, etc" isn't proof though correct? Can the license be saved by the end user and then reflashed to the same ECU after another solution was tested?
Doesn't really work that simply.

I've asked them to make this process easier, I'm waiting for a response

The reason this type of thing is not simple is because their software was hack a number of years ago.
Visconti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 11:41 AM   #60
Foobar
SLO NO MO
 
Foobar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: '19 Tesla Model 3 Performance
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 224
Thanked 1,062 Times in 738 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visconti View Post
Youll need proof the license is gone.

Ecutek doesn't save the license when put back to stock.

John
So when I go bring my car in to the dealer for warranty work, and I flash back to the stock file you provided, I can't just reflash the RaceROM version once I'm done? I have to get my license key regenerated by you first? What suffices as proof? If the dealer didn't swap out an ECU or do a reflash, but I just wanted to return to stock so they don't question anything, I don't have anything from the dealer in the way of a workorder that says they swapped out or reflashed the ECU.
Foobar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 11:43 AM   #61
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visconti View Post
Doesn't really work that simply.

I've asked them to make this process easier, I'm waiting for a response

The reason this type of thing is not simple is because their software was hack a number of years ago.
I understand that and understand the need for encrypting the data at rest and in transit. I just don't understand that If I were to reflash the ECU with <insert other reflash name here> to mess around with other options that I wouldn't be able to then reflash it back to ECUTek if I liked ECUTek more. I'm 100% fine with ECUTek protecting their IP. I have zero interest in their IP, but I may have an interest in trying various other options out of curiousity. This would specifically annoy me if I were a shop and wanted to test options for customers on the shop car first.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post:
ATL BRZ (02-27-2013)
Old 02-27-2013, 11:44 AM   #62
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foobar View Post
So when I go bring my car in to the dealer for warranty work, and I flash back to the stock file you provided, I can't just reflash the RaceROM version once I'm done? I have to get my license key regenerated by you first? What suffices as proof? If the dealer didn't swap out an ECU or do a reflash, but I just wanted to return to stock so they don't question anything, I don't have anything from the dealer in the way of a workorder that says they swapped out or reflashed the ECU.
I think the ECUTek "flash to stock" is really just a stock program, it's not truely stock as in un-flashed, John can correct me if I'm incorrect.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post:
Foobar (02-27-2013)
Old 02-27-2013, 11:45 AM   #63
Visconti
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 05 STi
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 2,843
Thanks: 196
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,197 Posts
Mentioned: 375 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Visconti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foobar View Post
So when I go bring my car in to the dealer for warranty work, and I flash back to the stock file you provided, I can't just reflash the RaceROM version once I'm done? I have to get my license key regenerated by you first? What suffices as proof? If the dealer didn't swap out an ECU or do a reflash, but I just wanted to return to stock so they don't question anything, I don't have anything from the dealer in the way of a workorder that says they swapped out or reflashed the ECU.
License stays in the Ecu when it's flash back to stock.
Visconti is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Visconti For This Useful Post:
Foobar (02-27-2013)
Old 02-27-2013, 11:46 AM   #64
Visconti
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 05 STi
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 2,843
Thanks: 196
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,197 Posts
Mentioned: 375 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Visconti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
I think the ECUTek "flash to stock" is really just a stock program, it's not truely stock as in un-flashed, John can correct me if I'm incorrect.
It's stock with a byte change
Visconti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 12:03 PM   #65
SkullWorks
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SSM LT MT BRZ
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,033
Thanks: 803
Thanked 754 Times in 328 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visconti View Post
Doesn't really work that simply.

I've asked them to make this process easier, I'm waiting for a response

The reason this type of thing is not simple is because their software was hack a number of years ago.


It's always funny to hear a company who infringes on others IP rights for it's only source of income to complain that the same might happen to them. It's even sillier for them to think that there is anything keeping someone who actually wanted their software from doing the same thing they did.

On another note you don't see every other ECUTek tuner bashing/getting bashed constantly on this forum, this is a separate issue more related to the size of the chip John carries around and brandishes constantly. I have never seen a "tuner" act so disrespectfully to other companies/tuners/customers on such a regular basis. All of this from a guy who only exists on the interwebs...straight E-Cred YO!!! Keyboard warrior extraordinaire.

SkullWorks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 12:13 PM   #66
Visconti
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 05 STi
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 2,843
Thanks: 196
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,197 Posts
Mentioned: 375 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Visconti
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkullWorks View Post
It's always funny to hear a company who infringes on others IP rights for it's only source of income to complain that the same might happen to them. It's even sillier for them to think that there is anything keeping someone who actually wanted their software from doing the same thing they did.

On another note you don't see every other ECUTek tuner bashing/getting bashed constantly on this forum, this is a separate issue more related to the size of the chip John carries around and brandishes constantly. I have never seen a "tuner" act so disrespectfully to other companies/tuners/customers on such a regular basis. All of this from a guy who only exists on the interwebs...straight E-Cred YO!!! Keyboard warrior extraordinaire.

infringes ? How so

And since I only have e-cred-yo that would explain why I'm not in my PJs posting this from my bed lol

I'm only responding to this because i literally just spilled my coffee from laughing so hard !

Some carry big chips - I certainly don't.

I get caught up in questions like this because most of the time I'm the only vendor to respond or first to respond.

Visconti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 12:22 PM   #67
SkullWorks
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: SSM LT MT BRZ
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,033
Thanks: 803
Thanked 754 Times in 328 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
did ECUTek buy the rights to access the IP inside the ECU and extract such data?

Last edited by Dave-ROR; 02-27-2013 at 12:25 PM. Reason: attack removed
SkullWorks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 12:25 PM   #68
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Again, let's keep this professional. Both of you guys love to attack each other and we don't need another thread to get a massive cleanup because of it.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post:
SkullWorks (02-27-2013)
Old 02-27-2013, 12:27 PM   #69
Foobar
SLO NO MO
 
Foobar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: '19 Tesla Model 3 Performance
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 224
Thanked 1,062 Times in 738 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
I think the ECUTek "flash to stock" is really just a stock program, it's not truely stock as in un-flashed, John can correct me if I'm incorrect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visconti View Post
License stays in the Ecu when it's flash back to stock.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visconti View Post
It's stock with a byte change
OK, now it makes sense.

So at this point, does the dealer have the ability to perform a reflash of their own or is the ECU still locked to ECUTek?
Foobar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2013, 12:38 PM   #70
Visconti
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 05 STi
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 2,843
Thanks: 196
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,197 Posts
Mentioned: 375 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Visconti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foobar View Post
OK, now it makes sense.

So at this point, does the dealer have the ability to perform a reflash of their own or is the ECU still locked to ECUTek?
It's unlocked, so it can be flashed over.

The dealer will provide documentation if they do this.

I have had several people lose licenses and a few sell cars / cables...they contact me and I take care of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Again, let's keep this professional. Both of you guys love to attack each other and we don't need another thread to get a massive cleanup because of it.

Looks like its already been cleaned.
Visconti is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let's get tuning! EcuTek tuning now available! carbonBLUE Southwest 6 06-29-2015 03:37 PM
Tuning for E85 Vs 91 Vicious LED Software Tuning 20 04-10-2014 11:56 PM
Visconti Tuning - Latest Forced Induction Tuning Info Visconti Forced Induction 340 04-30-2013 07:33 PM
Tuning Jordo! Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 54 09-05-2010 06:29 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.