|
||||||
| Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting What these cars were built for! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Pedals over Paddles.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Celica GT-S | 89 Supra | 07' Accent
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,255
Thanks: 377
Thanked 684 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
My PTWR = 190hp@2400lbs: 12.6 / 140tq@2400lbs: 17.1 FRS PTWR= 200hp@2700lbs: 13.5 / 151tq@2700lbs: 17.9 Now, those are just numbers and the FRS has well proven that it doesn't play the numbers game. Forgive me if this comes off as stupid, but i've done the aero/suspension tweaking in Forza 3 and 4 and it's done me really well. (the concept made sense in my head so i tried it in the game and it worked.) This in itself is not much of a credential, seeing as it's just a game. I concede that. Although, i'm not necessarily trying to delete the oversteer completely-- a little can be useful for rotating the car. In your post you mentioned FWD guys you know keeping their cars loose; that's a typical thing to do in FWD. You stiffen up the rear sway bar, raise the PSi, and add a little toe out and you can typically rotate like a champ with a slight oversteer and lift the inside rear off the ground. My whole assertion was merely to rid the car of any excess oversteer. I just feel like there is something to be gained by the lesser unsprung weight. Also, i'm setting aside the rules by which SCCA and NASA guys have to abide by. Please rebut as though we're not penalized by such modifications.
__________________
![]() 2002 Celica GT-S Track Car | 1989 Supra Track Car | 2007 Hyundai Accent AutoX | 2003 Cadillac CTS Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,519
Thanks: 8,910
Thanked 14,163 Times in 6,827 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
What is the ultimate goal? Under what kind of conditions are you driving?
To me, the was was never very loose; I'm pretty much WOT everywhere, and any rear end action is a direct result of driver input, at least, on a stock FRS. If you keep that rear tucked in, it's FAST. The larger wheels aren't stabilizing the car. Rather, they're increasing the cornering limits, and driven the same, effectively "more stable". Sure, you could make suspension changes to make the car less pushy. You could also play with aero. I'd be wary of making any drastic aero changes to the car, as its already rather underpowered. Then again, I seem to have a bias toward loose cars. I think the stock FRS understeers (and it does at terminal; oversteer is always driver induced in my observations). I suppose the best way to figure this out is to determine what you consider excess oversteer, as each driver's preference is different. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post: | xwd (01-10-2013) |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Pedals over Paddles.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Celica GT-S | 89 Supra | 07' Accent
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,255
Thanks: 377
Thanked 684 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Also, thank you for your responses-- they have been educational, non-biased and overall pleasurable.
__________________
![]() 2002 Celica GT-S Track Car | 1989 Supra Track Car | 2007 Hyundai Accent AutoX | 2003 Cadillac CTS Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,519
Thanks: 8,910
Thanked 14,163 Times in 6,827 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The "corrections" are to correct the rear getting loose, but the rear is getting loose because I'm testing the front traction (this was the first hot lap I have ever done at this track in the BRZ). [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yik-oAVm3U"]BRZ Willow Springs International Raceway 1:38 - YouTube[/ame] Turn 2 is over 85 mph, and Turn 8 is over 120. Zero aero, stock suspension. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Pedals over Paddles.
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Celica GT-S | 89 Supra | 07' Accent
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,255
Thanks: 377
Thanked 684 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Yeah wow, the car seemed well planted nearly the entire time. Stock wheel/tire size as well?
__________________
![]() 2002 Celica GT-S Track Car | 1989 Supra Track Car | 2007 Hyundai Accent AutoX | 2003 Cadillac CTS Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Suspension/Wheel budget of $5000-6000. Priority is actual upgrade, looks are 2ndary | Hanakuso | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 12 | 09-16-2012 04:46 AM |
| suspension question | Bruninho8 | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 26 | 08-14-2012 06:03 PM |
| Wheel fitment question | thelegaCy | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 3 | 08-06-2012 12:22 AM |
| Stock Suspension and Wheel Fitment | bneale | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 11 | 06-29-2012 08:42 PM |
| BRZ vs. FRS suspension question | smbrm | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 1 | 06-12-2012 10:55 AM |