follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2009, 02:00 PM   #43
S2KtoFT86
Resident Post Whore
 
S2KtoFT86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2022 WR BRZ
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siriusly.Andrew View Post
Its in my experience a lot of tuners ended up buying the yaris as a DD that ended up with a list of "mods to do". I knew a guy on the Matrix forums that bought his wife a Yaris and ended up tuning / turbo'd it. It was an impulse - once a tuner, always a tuner. You'll always find something to mod/enhance/change and then tune, weather you custom fabricate the mod or buy it - weather its a 1990 tool shed or a 2011 Toyota FT-86 -- you catch the bug and you can't cure it
__________________
Gavin

S2KtoFT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:05 PM   #44
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blokatos View Post

Talking in European terms, 1200 kgs is a threshold for a sports car to be considered lightweight although this may sound (and actually be) a generalization...

The new Lotus Evora weighs around 1350 kgs and has a 280 hp N/A 3.5 V6. It is considered quite lardy. The fact that Lotus has been producing very light sports cars could play a role into this but doesn't change people's perception.
As with everyone who brings up cars such as lotus, you have to keep the price range in perspective.

A Lotus is expensive, well, because its a lotus, but also because of the materials used in building the cars.

The FT is going to be a low $20k car. We're not going to see any carbon-fiber body panels, etc. being put on this car to lower the weight.

That being said, for a $20k FR car with its dimensions, I still think they can keep the weight ~2600, without going over the 2750 benchmark.

I think I've seen a few people say they would be surprised if it got lower than 2900. Thats just insane. There's keeping your expectations low so as to not get burned with the real product and then there's just insanity. If this car weighs in >2800lbs I will not only be shocked but also questioning Toyota's ability to engineer a wheel, let alone a car.
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:27 PM   #45
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Furthermore any basis on what weight this car is going to be is purely educated guessing, opinion, or a mixture of both. To use the yaris is a terrible example. The car has absolutely nothing in common with the FT. If you were to use a recent Toyota car to compare, it would have to be the last gen Celica, whose chassis was at least built for spirited driving.

The Celica weighed in at ~2500lbs with an overall length of 170.5 inches. Thats almost 7 inches longer than the FT-86 concept. Alright, so we're saving weight. Wrong, the FT-86 is RWD, which adds in extra weight for the drivetrain. The chassis also has to be a bit beefier because of the RWD setup. If accident regulations have changed in 4 years (to any amount significant to weight) then we have to factor that in as well.

Again its all just educated guessing. I'm throwing my last 2 cents in though on this topic. ~2600lbs (roughly 1160kg) Higher than 2750 and Toyota completely failed with this car.
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 03:07 PM   #46
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
The fact remains that Lots of people everywhere (especially in the pacific rim) tune the yaris/vitz and there is a lot of aftermarket support for it. Don't loose focus of the initial premise.
I haven't lost focus, which is why I continue to mention the total number of enthusiasts vs the overall ownership at large. Anyone can say that they think the Yaris has a large enthusiast following, based on internet phenomena, and their personal experience, but that is selection bias, not taking into account that typical Yaris owners don't join car forums or follow the latest news out of Japan with respect to their car.

Again, my point remains: the Yaris as point of reference for the FT86 does not work, for the reasons I previously mentioned, many of which were reinforced by Old Skoo (who also added in some new points as well).
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 03:12 PM   #47
Slothman86
86 Enthusiast
 
Slothman86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Yaris LB 5MT
Location: GA
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
No one's buying a Yaris to wind the piss out of it and possible slam into a mountain side pretending they're the ultimate Tofu delivery person.
oh yeah?...

lol
Slothman86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 04:00 PM   #48
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slothman86 View Post
oh yeah?...

lol
Go back and re-read the discussion that's been going on between myself and a few other posters here, and maybe then you'll understand my point.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 04:33 PM   #49
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
I haven't lost focus, which is why I continue to mention the total number of enthusiasts vs the overall ownership at large. Anyone can say that they think the Yaris has a large enthusiast following, based on internet phenomena, and their personal experience, but that is selection bias, not taking into account that typical Yaris owners don't join car forums or follow the latest news out of Japan with respect to their car.

Again, my point remains: the Yaris as point of reference for the FT86 does not work, for the reasons I previously mentioned, many of which were reinforced by Old Skoo (who also added in some new points as well).

I wasn't the one who used the Yaris as a base for comparison regarding the weight. That is not my point at all. You made a blanket statement and I corrected you. End of story. Do you want to argue just for the sake of arguing? There isn't anything else to it. I completely agree with OldSkool on his points, I share the same opinion.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 08:27 PM   #50
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
I wasn't the one who used the Yaris as a base for comparison regarding the weight. That is not my point at all. You made a blanket statement and I corrected you.
You did not correct me. My point still stands. Toyota did not intend the Yaris to be used as a sports car.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 08:35 PM   #51
scape
Senior Member
 
scape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: yaris
Location: sc
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
the reason i used the yaris as a comparison earlier is b/c it's still in production, relatively new, can handle 200hp setups, actually safe, and weighs hardly anything. my point is what would make the FT weigh in at 28-2900 lbs when a yaris weighs so little...I think there is a decent comparison to be had here, seeing my points, and such I don't see where on earth 5-600 lbs would come from? i think it's short sighted to assume it will weigh as much as other sports cars currently in production...
__________________
scape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 08:45 PM   #52
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by scape View Post
the reason i used the yaris as a comparison earlier is b/c it's still in production, relatively new, can handle 200hp setups, actually safe, and weighs hardly anything. my point is what would make the FT weigh in at 28-2900 lbs when a yaris weighs so little...I think there is a decent comparison to be had here, seeing my points, and such I don't see where on earth 5-600 lbs would come from? i think it's short sighted to assume it will weigh as much as other sports cars currently in production...
Fair enough, but my skepticism still holds because you are comparing an FWD economy car to a RWD sports car. That alone is enough to make the comparison moot, as Old Skoo explained, as per the drivetrain differences. My point also stands that to get this car down to the desired price and have the target power, there is going to be some platform sharing with heavier pieces. The Yaris doesn't have this problem because it's fairly decontented and really only needs to share parts with other economy cars that don't make a lot of power (and therefore don't require a lot of reinforcement for stress).

I think 2800-2900 lbs might be too skeptical (even for me), but 2400 lbs? Not a freaking chance. Not for 21 grand.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 08:47 PM   #53
scape
Senior Member
 
scape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: yaris
Location: sc
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
well then let's hope it meets in the middle b/c heavy will not bode well...
__________________
scape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 08:56 PM   #54
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by scape View Post
well then let's hope it meets in the middle b/c heavy will not bode well...
:happy0180:
Agreed. If it comes out at 2600 lbs and has 180-200 hp, I'll be happy. If it weighs any less than that, I'll be ecstatic.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:53 AM   #55
hoffo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: none
Location: poop
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
:happy0180:
Agreed. If it comes out at 2600 lbs and has 180-200 hp, I'll be happy. If it weighs any less than that, I'll be ecstatic.
Totally agree
hoffo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:53 AM   #56
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
You did not correct me. My point still stands. Toyota did not intend the Yaris to be used as a sports car.
And my point is that it is used as a tuner car regardless of what Toyota's original intention for it was.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subaru version of FT-86 JDMinc BRZ Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 25 10-28-2020 01:18 PM
Subaru 216A confirmed with 2.0L turbo, AWD, bigger and heavier than FT-86 Hachiroku BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 118 11-16-2017 03:19 PM
North America to get Subaru version but not Toyota version? Ground N Pound BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 42 05-29-2014 01:23 AM
Subaru Version (video) #87 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 7 10-31-2009 02:44 AM
No Subaru FT-86 for Australia! And currently no Subaru AWD version production plans. Edi BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 103 10-27-2009 03:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.