|
||||||
| BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#43 | |
|
Resident Post Whore
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2022 WR BRZ
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Gavin
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Is a Monster
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
A Lotus is expensive, well, because its a lotus, but also because of the materials used in building the cars. The FT is going to be a low $20k car. We're not going to see any carbon-fiber body panels, etc. being put on this car to lower the weight. That being said, for a $20k FR car with its dimensions, I still think they can keep the weight ~2600, without going over the 2750 benchmark. I think I've seen a few people say they would be surprised if it got lower than 2900. Thats just insane. There's keeping your expectations low so as to not get burned with the real product and then there's just insanity. If this car weighs in >2800lbs I will not only be shocked but also questioning Toyota's ability to engineer a wheel, let alone a car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Is a Monster
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Furthermore any basis on what weight this car is going to be is purely educated guessing, opinion, or a mixture of both. To use the yaris is a terrible example. The car has absolutely nothing in common with the FT. If you were to use a recent Toyota car to compare, it would have to be the last gen Celica, whose chassis was at least built for spirited driving.
The Celica weighed in at ~2500lbs with an overall length of 170.5 inches. Thats almost 7 inches longer than the FT-86 concept. Alright, so we're saving weight. Wrong, the FT-86 is RWD, which adds in extra weight for the drivetrain. The chassis also has to be a bit beefier because of the RWD setup. If accident regulations have changed in 4 years (to any amount significant to weight) then we have to factor that in as well. Again its all just educated guessing. I'm throwing my last 2 cents in though on this topic. ~2600lbs (roughly 1160kg) Higher than 2750 and Toyota completely failed with this car. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Resident Skeptic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Again, my point remains: the Yaris as point of reference for the FT86 does not work, for the reasons I previously mentioned, many of which were reinforced by Old Skoo (who also added in some new points as well). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
86 Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Yaris LB 5MT
Location: GA
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Resident Skeptic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
hashiryu
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I wasn't the one who used the Yaris as a base for comparison regarding the weight. That is not my point at all. You made a blanket statement and I corrected you. End of story. Do you want to argue just for the sake of arguing? There isn't anything else to it. I completely agree with OldSkool on his points, I share the same opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Resident Skeptic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You did not correct me. My point still stands. Toyota did not intend the Yaris to be used as a sports car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: yaris
Location: sc
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
the reason i used the yaris as a comparison earlier is b/c it's still in production, relatively new, can handle 200hp setups, actually safe, and weighs hardly anything. my point is what would make the FT weigh in at 28-2900 lbs when a yaris weighs so little...I think there is a decent comparison to be had here, seeing my points, and such I don't see where on earth 5-600 lbs would come from? i think it's short sighted to assume it will weigh as much as other sports cars currently in production...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Resident Skeptic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I think 2800-2900 lbs might be too skeptical (even for me), but 2400 lbs? Not a freaking chance. Not for 21 grand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: yaris
Location: sc
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
well then let's hope it meets in the middle
b/c heavy will not bode well...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Resident Skeptic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: none
Location: poop
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
hashiryu
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Subaru version of FT-86 | JDMinc | BRZ Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum | 25 | 10-28-2020 01:18 PM |
| Subaru 216A confirmed with 2.0L turbo, AWD, bigger and heavier than FT-86 | Hachiroku | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 118 | 11-16-2017 03:19 PM |
| North America to get Subaru version but not Toyota version? | Ground N Pound | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 42 | 05-29-2014 01:23 AM |
| Subaru Version (video) | #87 | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 7 | 10-31-2009 02:44 AM |
| No Subaru FT-86 for Australia! And currently no Subaru AWD version production plans. | Edi | BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics | 103 | 10-27-2009 03:27 PM |