follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-05-2009, 11:46 PM   #29
IBCoupe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 3.5SE
Location: Groton, CT
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffo View Post
The current gen NC Mazda MX-5 is only 2400-2500 lbs depending upon trim level. Convertibles are also heavier than coupes due to needing more chassis bracing without a fixed roof. So this car can still come in under 2700 lbs no problem, but only if they focus on making it as light as possible which is what Mazda engineers had to do with the NC redesign to keep weight down.
I'm with Hoffo on that one. I've always maintained that hardtops were superior sports cars to convertibles for that reason. Not only the extra bracing required, but a convertible that has a power-assisted roof is going to gain an even larger amount of weight from the roof mechanism itself. A hardtop convertible is probably the absolute worst, in this regard.

I also agree that it's going to take an extreme focus on the part of Toyota and Subaru to keep the weight down. The Miata's a two-seater, after all, and this means that its safety requirements go into protecting two people, not four. I think, at our most optimistic, we can imagine the FT-86 weighing as little as the MX-5, but no less.
IBCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 12:46 AM   #30
NESW20
2.1L 3SGTE
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MR2 Turbo & Tacoma
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 29
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
if it's lighter than my MR2, that's enough for me.

-Mike
__________________
1991 MR2 Turbo - 2.1L high compression stroker 3SGTE
2006 Tacoma 4x4 TRD Off Road - All-Pro front bumper, Old Man Emu shocks, Old Man Emu HD front coils, All-Pro leafs
1990 240SX Coupe - sold
2008 Civic Si Sedan
NESW20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 04:38 AM   #31
Blokatos
Senior Member
 
Blokatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MX5 Miata Mk2.5 1.6
Location: Here
Posts: 132
Thanks: 86
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
Stop comparing apples to oranges (i.e. a brand new car with an older car; different layout; etc). It's not going to work.
I am not comparing. How can you compare something that exists with something you know almost nothing about???

I am trying to reach a reasonable assumption through using a point of reference.


Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
The FT is going to be a sports car. And in this day and age, you don't get to be a successful car company if you sell a sports car that won't protect the owner from itself. Safety equipment and parts bin sharing (to keep costs down) will keep this car from weighing in anywhere close to what everyone here thinks it will be.
Yes it is going to be a sports car. As Toyota says, a lightweight one. It's up to us, potential customers to judge if they succeeded or not. Hoffo is right using MX-5's weight as an example. Being a coupe, FT-86 has more potential for a lightweight chassis. Boxer engine helps too as it is a compact and light engine structure.

The critical factor is the excess luxury which in FT-86's case is not needed. If they try to keep it simple, it will be lightweight.
__________________


Back to the ancient art of driving!
Blokatos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 01:40 PM   #32
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
How many is "many?"

I'm not disputing some people are doing this, but I'm willing to bet it's an infinitely small number of people in proportion to those who buy the car as a basic means of transportation. The FT is being aimed at the enthusiast. Very different scenario. Especially considering it will be priced within range of those just getting their driving licenses whose parents have more money than brains.
It might be aimed at enthusiasts, but enthusiasts are not a large enough market to sustain a car. A lot of people WILL buy it as basic transportation, a lot of people will buy it because they want a good looking coupe to cruise around in and a lot of people will buy it because it is (will be?) economical and efficient. So, it is pretty much the same scenario, depends on what angle you look at it form.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBCoupe View Post
I've seen hundreds of Yarises on the road, and I've yet to see a turbo'd one. While it's entirely possible that there are people out there who will turbo a Yaris (I'm sure there are people who will turbo a bar stool, if they can), I'm not sure this is the demographic Toyota had in mind when they designed, engineered, and marketed the Yaris.
Toyota probably didn't have the tuner market in mind when they brought over the Yaris, but there are lots of tuned Yaris/Vitz all over the world, not just in the USA. Not to mention in their home market there is an insane following, it even has it's own one make racing series AND TRD makes a turbo kit/ dealer ordered turbo version of the RS model, so i'm thinking they probably were not ignorant to the fact that tuning the car was a distinct possibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blokatos View Post



I don't want to buy a Type R. I would if I did. I prefer RWD on a sports car. Just wanted to show that 200 hp doesn't mean heavy weight...

That does not weigh less than than 2700lbs.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 01:46 PM   #33
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,933
Thanks: 7,637
Thanked 18,976 Times in 8,306 Posts
Mentioned: 667 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
That does not weigh less than than 2700lbs.
Correction, 2,733 lbs (1,240 kg) you were 33 lbs off.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 08:44 PM   #34
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blokatos View Post
I am trying to reach a reasonable assumption through using a point of reference.
Fair enough, but my position is that the speed with which safety regs move these days (therefore affecting standard equipment which affects weight) is so fast that you cannot use a car that came out in 2002 as a reference point for a car that will come out 9 years later. Furthermore, one if a sporty, FWD hatch and another is a RWD sports car. Again, apples to oranges.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blokatos View Post
Yes it is going to be a sports car. As Toyota says, a lightweight one. It's up to us, potential customers to judge if they succeeded or not. Hoffo is right using MX-5's weight as an example. Being a coupe, FT-86 has more potential for a lightweight chassis. Boxer engine helps too as it is a compact and light engine structure.

The critical factor is the excess luxury which in FT-86's case is not needed. If they try to keep it simple, it will be lightweight.
It will be relatively lightweight, for 2011. It will not be lightweight compared for 1990, or even 2000. The Japanese Toyota officials have already dropped a proposed weight of what, 1300 kg (2820 lbs)? That is a rough estimate at best, so there is still plenty of opportunity to knock off some weight here and there, but less than 2600 lbs is not happening. Period.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
It might be aimed at enthusiasts, but enthusiasts are not a large enough market to sustain a car. A lot of people WILL buy it as basic transportation, a lot of people will buy it because they want a good looking coupe to cruise around in and a lot of people will buy it because it is (will be?) economical and efficient. So, it is pretty much the same scenario, depends on what angle you look at it form.
You make a good point, but it doesn't change the overall picture. Overwhelmingly, people buy a Yaris for transportation and nothing else. It has an almost non-existant enthusiast population (relative to total sales). The FT-86 will have a much greater population of enthusiasts relative to total owners, and that will be reflected very quickly in the aftermarket support it garners almost right away after its release.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 11:39 PM   #35
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
You make a good point, but it doesn't change the overall picture. Overwhelmingly, people buy a Yaris for transportation and nothing else. It has an almost non-existant enthusiast population (relative to total sales). The FT-86 will have a much greater population of enthusiasts relative to total owners, and that will be reflected very quickly in the aftermarket support it garners almost right away after its release.
...in your corner of the globe.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 12:56 AM   #36
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
...in your corner of the globe.
Care to elaborate? I'd love to know just where the Yaris will somehow be a bigger hit with enthusiasts (again, relative to its total number of owners) than the FT.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 01:55 AM   #37
YourFearlessLeader
Team ScioNRG President
 
YourFearlessLeader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2017 WRB BRZ
Location: Staten Island
Posts: 483
Thanks: 113
Thanked 147 Times in 70 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Not to argue against your point at all, White Comet, but here in NY and NYC there are quite a few Yaris' clubs which have some nice rides. However, youre right when you say relative to total sales. The FT86 will be more of a sports car than a Yaris could ever dream to be.

You will always have more Nissan Z enthusiasts than you will Nissan Versa entusiants (analogy).
__________________
2017 Subaru WRB Limited BRZ w/ PP
YourFearlessLeader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:50 AM   #38
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by YourFearlessLeader View Post
Not to argue against your point at all, White Comet, but here in NY and NYC there are quite a few Yaris' clubs which have some nice rides. However, youre right when you say relative to total sales. The FT86 will be more of a sports car than a Yaris could ever dream to be.

You will always have more Nissan Z enthusiasts than you will Nissan Versa entusiants (analogy).
Hey, I have zero problem with people wanting to argue. That's the beauty of forums. If there are more Yaris enthusiasts than I suggested, call me wrong and I say "great!" for Toyota for creating a basic commuter car that somehow caught on with tuners.

But it doesn't change my statement about the FT going to have way, way more aftermarket and enthusiasts owning it.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 10:58 AM   #39
Blokatos
Senior Member
 
Blokatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MX5 Miata Mk2.5 1.6
Location: Here
Posts: 132
Thanks: 86
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
That does not weigh less than than 2700lbs.

In Euro spec weighed 1200 kgs or 2650 lbs...
__________________


Back to the ancient art of driving!
Blokatos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 12:11 PM   #40
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blokatos View Post
In Euro spec weighed 1200 kgs or 2650 lbs...
Granted, but it also had just exactly 200hp.

If the FT weighs about the same and has similar hp, what is the problem?

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
Care to elaborate? I'd love to know just where the Yaris will somehow be a bigger hit with enthusiasts (again, relative to its total number of owners) than the FT.

Never said it will be a bigger hit, I'm just saying it is what it is. it could never win a numbers game because of the amount of Yarii sold and you know that. The fact remains that Lots of people everywhere (especially in the pacific rim) tune the yaris/vitz and there is a lot of aftermarket support for it. Don't loose focus of the initial premise.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 01:48 PM   #41
Blokatos
Senior Member
 
Blokatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MX5 Miata Mk2.5 1.6
Location: Here
Posts: 132
Thanks: 86
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
Granted, but it also had just exactly 200hp.
If the FT weighs about the same and has similar hp, what is the problem?
No problem at all.

Let's all have in mind that lightweight can be relative. Power to weight ratio is critical to straight line performance. Absolute weight figure plays an important role to handling and response to driver inputs.

Talking in European terms, 1200 kgs is a threshold for a sports car to be considered lightweight although this may sound (and actually be) a generalization...

The new Lotus Evora weighs around 1350 kgs and has a 280 hp N/A 3.5 V6. It is considered quite lardy. The fact that Lotus has been producing very light sports cars could play a role into this but doesn't change people's perception.

In USA, with all the Mustangs and Camaros and Challengers, 1300 kgs may sound ok but here in Europe, this figure brings to mind sluggish, underpowered family hatches...

Toyota is a global brand and all markets must be under consideration. What may make US happy, may not make happy European customers...
__________________


Back to the ancient art of driving!
Blokatos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 01:53 PM   #42
Siriusly.Andrew
Senior Member
 
Siriusly.Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 1995 Civic DX
Location: Fort St. John BC CAN
Posts: 557
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Its in my experience a lot of tuners ended up buying the yaris as a DD that ended up with a list of "mods to do". I knew a guy on the Matrix forums that bought his wife a Yaris and ended up tuning / turbo'd it. It was an impulse - once a tuner, always a tuner. You'll always find something to mod/enhance/change and then tune, weather you custom fabricate the mod or buy it - weather its a 1990 tool shed or a 2011 Toyota FT-86 -- you catch the bug and you can't cure it
Siriusly.Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subaru version of FT-86 JDMinc BRZ Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 25 10-28-2020 01:18 PM
Subaru 216A confirmed with 2.0L turbo, AWD, bigger and heavier than FT-86 Hachiroku BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 118 11-16-2017 03:19 PM
North America to get Subaru version but not Toyota version? Ground N Pound BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 42 05-29-2014 01:23 AM
Subaru Version (video) #87 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 7 10-31-2009 02:44 AM
No Subaru FT-86 for Australia! And currently no Subaru AWD version production plans. Edi BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 103 10-27-2009 03:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.