follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2011, 02:42 AM   #71
Aki
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Drives: '96 beater Corolla
Location: Cali
Posts: 409
Thanks: 7
Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
That was addressed in the post you are quoting.
And you quoted it out of context. It's in context to the weight in cars, not the molecular density of the metal. Seemed pretty clear to me, guess not...

Quote:
Added the emphasis to 'component weight'.
Tensile strength of AHSS is around 500-800 MPa. Aluminum (typically 6061, 6111 alloys, but also 5XXXX alloys) is around 200-325 MPa. That's what evens out the BIW weight somewhat, and why the weight differential isn't as huge as you'd expect.
Aki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2011, 03:37 AM   #72
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aki View Post
And you quoted it out of context. It's in context to the weight in cars, not the molecular density of the metal. Seemed pretty clear to me, guess not...



Tensile strength of AHSS is around 500-800 MPa. Aluminum (typically 6061, 6111 alloys, but also 5XXXX alloys) is around 200-325 MPa. That's what evens out the BIW weight somewhat, and why the weight differential isn't as huge as you'd expect.
First off, you said that your AHSS steel is 15% heavier than aluminum. It isn't. It's about 188% heavier.

Now lets talk about component weight.

Let's use simple round bars 12" long. Using your strengths. One in 800 MPa (116000 psi) AHSS vs 325 MPa (47000 psi) aluminum.

The steel is 2.47 times stronger than the aluminum. So the cross-sectional area of the aluminum needs to be 2.47 times that of the steel.

Using a 1" square cross section area, the steel has a diameter of 1.128"
Using a 2.47" square cross section area, the aluminum has a diameter of 1.773"

This gives you the larger bulk that you are talking correctly about.

Now the steel's 1" area x 12" gives 12 cu inches.
The aluminum's 2.47" area x 12" gives 29.64 cu inches.

Divide these by 1728 to convert to cubic feet.
Steel: .00694 cu ft
Alum: .01715 cu ft

Now multiply by the densities for component weight:
Steel: .00694 x 490 lbs = 3.4006 lbs
Alum: .01715 x 170 lbs = 2.9155 lbs

And this gives you the steel component's weight penalty of 16.6%. close enough to your 15% statement.

See the difference, Aki?

We've gone at it before about your lack of clarity. You said the steel itself is 15% heavier, when it is the component. ^This is how it works.

The other issue, is that steel is almost never used in its maximum strength condition, due to its lack of toughness. Aluminum is quite often used in its maximum strength condition if it is heat-treated.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2011, 04:35 AM   #73
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
You could've just used 2.88/2.47
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.