follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-02-2012, 05:17 PM   #29
Allch Chcar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If they do make one, it'll be as much as an WRX STI minus the cost of turbocharging, (of course). Factory STI parts are much more expensive than decent aftermarket parts.

There was an early rumor from an interview they could have made 230BHP but that they went 200BHP for better emissions and fuel economy. I've seen the interview but I can't remember if it as Tada, the lead engineer, or some marketing guy.

Dunno about the release expectations, only know I've seen rumors and promises that say/suggest it'll be 100% N/A and RWD.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonitti View Post
Daily Driver, occasional weekend drifter.
Allch Chcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2012, 06:55 PM   #30
AndreaCristiano
Member
 
AndreaCristiano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Honda CR-V
Location: NJ
Posts: 55
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks to everyone with the maturity to actually discuss this
AndreaCristiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2012, 07:12 PM   #31
FT-86GOD
Senior Rocket Bunny
 
FT-86GOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 1982 XX KE70
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 218 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
In a year and a half BRZ will bring out an sti with turbo..... Who knows, maybe even S/C... For production...

In a year and a half TRD will bring out a S/C for production........ Then both STI/TRD will start playing with ECU....

Just my opinion....And Gentlemen Agreement....
__________________
BOSOZOKU STYLE BITCH........
FT-86GOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 02:36 AM   #32
Skyhound
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Jaguar X-Type
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 120
Thanks: 27
Thanked 46 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I don't remember which magazine it was, but I did read an article that Subie has stated that they do not want to turbo the BRZ. Subaru believes that the turbo is what makes the WRX famous, not the STI department as a whole so they want to explore other options with the BRZ. Though the same article did go on to say that they'll probably eat their words since their fanboys only want turbo + awd. They want it to be a lighter WRX. :/
Skyhound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 03:00 AM   #33
quik1987
Senior Member
 
quik1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: Bugatti Veyron
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 141
Thanked 569 Times in 256 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I wouldn't expect anything before 2014
quik1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 09:26 AM   #34
noAE86
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: ae86, etc..
Location: CHCH new zealand
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyhound View Post
fanboys only want turbo + awd. They want it to be a lighter WRX. :/
this is the most retarded part i dont understand,

if the fanboys wanted a wrx then buy a fcuk.ing WRX
its already turbo and awd, its

subaru/toyota is not stupid enough to do it to the brz and let it steal sales from one of there best sellers,
however subaru shoud never have gone to the hatch platform, it shoud have stayed with the imprezza coupe base, when it went hatch alot of my friends went cold on the wrx/sti hatch,

STI N/A tuning should be intriesting, i dont recall any NA models they have tuned to be sucessful/competitive.
noAE86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 09:57 AM   #35
industrial
Add lightness!
 
industrial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 17' WRX
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,253
Thanks: 380
Thanked 888 Times in 411 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyhound View Post
I don't remember which magazine it was, but I did read an article that Subie has stated that they do not want to turbo the BRZ. Subaru believes that the turbo is what makes the WRX famous, not the STI department as a whole so they want to explore other options with the BRZ. Though the same article did go on to say that they'll probably eat their words since their fanboys only want turbo + awd. They want it to be a lighter WRX. :/
I don't see a problem with adding a factory turbo option. They keep saying the WRX/STI will be it's own platform and no longer based on the Impreza. Maybe that platform will be a stretched BRZ?
industrial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 01:13 PM   #36
Bacon
i liek turtles
 
Bacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2002 Honda S2000
Location: US of A
Posts: 49
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noAE86 View Post
this is the most retarded part i dont understand,

if the fanboys wanted a wrx then buy a fcuk.ing WRX
its already turbo and awd, its

subaru/toyota is not stupid enough to do it to the brz and let it steal sales from one of there best sellers,
however subaru shoud never have gone to the hatch platform, it shoud have stayed with the imprezza coupe base, when it went hatch alot of my friends went cold on the wrx/sti hatch,

STI N/A tuning should be intriesting, i dont recall any NA models they have tuned to be sucessful/competitive.
Its not difficult to understand. They simply want a lightweight WRX (just like in the 90s) with a better chassis in regards to a turbo/AWD BRZ. The GC8 WRX weighed 2800 lbs. The current model weighs nearly 3400 lbs.

A turbo AWD BRZ wont ever happen but it would be awesome if it did. I have heard rumors of the next-gen WRX/STi being a BRZ platform mate so that would be more than good enough.

BTW, the Impreza coupe was never the standard model. The Impreza was always, from the beginning, designed as a 4-door sedan/saloon first. The coupe was more of an afterthought. A sexy one at that.
__________________
2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi - Aspen White - Since 2008
Bacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 01:45 PM   #37
AndreaCristiano
Member
 
AndreaCristiano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Honda CR-V
Location: NJ
Posts: 55
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacon View Post
Its not difficult to understand. They simply want a lightweight WRX (just like in the 90s) with a better chassis in regards to a turbo/AWD BRZ. The GC8 WRX weighed 2800 lbs. The current model weighs nearly 3400 lbs.

A turbo AWD BRZ wont ever happen but it would be awesome if it did. I have heard rumors of the next-gen WRX/STi being a BRZ platform mate so that would be more than good enough.

BTW, the Impreza coupe was never the standard model. The Impreza was always, from the beginning, designed as a 4-door sedan/saloon first. The coupe was more of an afterthought. A sexy one at that.
I concur I do not understand the hatred toward AWD on here
AndreaCristiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 02:01 PM   #38
thermobox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 16 Impreza 5dr CWP
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 332
Thanks: 5
Thanked 94 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I have no hatred towards AWD nor do I believe others to. I've owned an Outback, STi and currently a Saabaru. I have to have AWD in my life somehow.

I think your misunderstanding the fact that the BRZ shouldn't be AWD. Think about it for a moment.

If the BRZ was AWD they would have to change the name to BAZ.

Subaru already has their AWD Line-Ups secured in the WRX/STi Line-Ups. They don't need to add it to the BRZ to make it an STi version.
thermobox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 02:15 PM   #39
AndreaCristiano
Member
 
AndreaCristiano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Honda CR-V
Location: NJ
Posts: 55
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thermobox View Post
I have no hatred towards AWD nor do I believe others to. I've owned an Outback, STi and currently a Saabaru. I have to have AWD in my life somehow.

I think your misunderstanding the fact that the BRZ shouldn't be AWD. Think about it for a moment.

If the BRZ was AWD they would have to change the name to BAZ.

Subaru already has their AWD Line-Ups secured in the WRX/STi Line-Ups. They don't need to add it to the BRZ to make it an STi version.
No and I agree although it would add something to differentiate from the scion I mean they are really to similar
AndreaCristiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 02:34 PM   #40
thermobox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 16 Impreza 5dr CWP
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 332
Thanks: 5
Thanked 94 Times in 61 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You just gotta roll with it brother. This is nothing new for car marketing in America. There will be multiple models driving around with very little to tell them apart other than badges.
Trailblazer, 97X, Ascender, etc.
T/A, Firebird, Camaro
Laser, Talon, Eclipse
Town & Country, Grand Caravan, Routan
etc, etc

I like to see all of the different cars rebadged when I travel abroad. Recently in Mexico I saw some of my faves like the Chevy Astra and Nissan Tsuru.
thermobox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 02:48 PM   #41
schtebie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: CBS BRZ Limited
Location: TN
Posts: 494
Thanks: 336
Thanked 193 Times in 136 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreaCristiano View Post
No and I agree although it would add something to differentiate from the scion I mean they are really to similar
Would it differentiate the BRZ from FR-S? Of course.

It seems you're missing the business side of things. There's a reason why this was a joint venture between Toyota and Subaru. For any production car, there is a massive capital investment involved, from R&D to tooling the manufacturing plants. If Subaru was capable of adding AWD to differentiate from the Toyota model, they probably wouldn't have needed Toyota as a partner to begin with.

The GT86/BRZ/FR-S is a low volume vehicle and will remain as such. Sure, enthusiasts like ourselves absolutely adore the damn things. However, your average car buyer (e.g. family with 1 or 2 children) wants things that the FT86 cannot offer. Why else would you see so many Camrys, Corollas, and Civics on the road?

The FT86 can't be relied on for sustained profitability for Toyota/Subaru - the target customers are just a small subset of the overall car-buying population. At the end of the day, these companies are in it to make money. Investing such a huge amount of resources for little appreciable gain just doesn't make a whole lot of sense in the bigger scheme of things.
schtebie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 02:59 PM   #42
SVTSHC
(ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
 
SVTSHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Drives: 2015 Series Blue BRZ
Location: Bronx
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 930
Thanked 625 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreaCristiano View Post
I concur I do not understand the hatred toward AWD on here
It's more that AWD would require some SERIOUS reworking. It would essentially ruin the vehicle. Why? One of the big positives of the twins is it's incredibly low center of gravity; you can't have that center of gravity with AWD, the motor needs to be raised to accommodate the drivetrain. In addition to this the vehicle would be heavier and it's weight distribution skewed. The car then becomes an understeering, heavier, worse handling small car with increased parasitic driveline loss. NOT TO MENTION this would cut into STI sales heavily, which would be a bonehead move by Subie.

So then the question becomes, is that really worth it?
__________________

"Sweet Subaru, sweet Subaru, send your BRZ unto me, for the roads of the unworthy must be baptized in speed and glory." ~Zaku
SVTSHC is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What to expect at the dealeship mashal Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 20 07-11-2012 12:57 PM
What to expect when ordering a BRZ.. ap5512 BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 6 06-12-2012 04:10 AM
First 86 Unveilings....what to expect JDMrolla Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 2 05-12-2012 10:43 PM
What kinds of gains do you expect with E / I and tune? Partial Stall Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 66 05-10-2012 12:56 PM
Dealer Trade in ......what to expect ? Sall Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 42 01-17-2012 02:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.