|
Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
05-01-2021, 11:45 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: '13 BRZ
Location: Texas
Posts: 362
Thanks: 179
Thanked 235 Times in 149 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Intermittent Port Injection During 100% DI Operation
I am forcing 100% direct injection. EcuTek B01C on RR 12.1, 42154.
While running 100% DI the car will intermittently switch to 50% port injection. It hits 50% PI then immediately switches back to direct. This will usually happen two or three times throughout a 30 minute cruise. While driving I thought it was the CL/OL transition, but it occurs during steady CL operation. It is not causing a problem for tuning, however I am curious as to why the ECU is doing this. I've attached a screenshot with my PI/DI ratios and log sample. I initially tried to force 100% DI through custom maps, but something else in the ECU was overriding the fuel ratio output. Fuel ratio would switch rapidly from 0% to 100% with my map enabled. Using the stock ratio maps gave better results beyond the intermittent hiccup. Has anyone else seen this before? Is it typical with these ECUs, or is it possibly a bug in EcuTek / RR 12.1? I don't recall seeing this issue when I last tuned the car with RR9. |
05-01-2021, 12:13 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
i think it's hard coded into ecu logic
Like Before it warms up, the ecu will force switching to 50/50% PI/DI during idle and overrun i would just deal with it it should fully work 100% DI all the time once car is hot, at least it worked for me years ago I wouldn't be surprise also if it's a Racerom bug in your case EDIT: just saw now lol, you have B01C ... US tunes are super bugged with latest racerom Switch to A02G or A01G and everything will run much better I saw that behaviour multiple times while helping guys here, and they all were fixed by converting to euro tune If you're boosted , US tune produces strange offsets and compensations, so that when you switch to an Euro rom, it requires a full retune because maf will be much different |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post: | BRZoomTX (05-01-2021), DarkPira7e (05-01-2021) |
05-01-2021, 12:37 PM | #3 |
Rust bucket enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2013 Turbo Firestorm FRS
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,934
Thanks: 3,200
Thanked 4,095 Times in 2,045 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Can confirm at least that I had nothing but issues running Racerom with B01C on my '13. A01C resolved them for me though
__________________
Turbo FR-S Build - Build Thread
JDL EL Recirc manifold, Boostlab BL58x Turbo w/ T51R, 17x9 ARC-8, IAG block |
The Following User Says Thank You to DarkPira7e For This Useful Post: | BRZoomTX (05-01-2021) |
05-01-2021, 12:58 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
i think i skipped a01c because even if less bugged , it made strange calculation for PI fueling on boost compared to euro tunes, and that messed up with my habits
As, if you start with it it's no problem... but if you copypaste it into an Euro rom, afr goes really wild |
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post: | BRZoomTX (05-01-2021) |
05-01-2021, 03:08 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: '13 BRZ
Location: Texas
Posts: 362
Thanks: 179
Thanked 235 Times in 149 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Thanks to you both. It is good to have confirmation it is not just me.
Quote:
This is the first “problem” I’ve ran into on B01C. Open loop was on target with stock injectors and I didn’t notice much problems other than some tip in knock. I will watch more closely for any issues once I get into boost again. |
|
05-01-2021, 05:23 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Don' t waste time and fuel with B01C, it won't change
go back at least to A01C , see if it improves and you can tune it without annoying things popping out like this |
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post: | BRZoomTX (05-03-2021) |
05-04-2021, 10:23 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: '13 BRZ
Location: Texas
Posts: 362
Thanks: 179
Thanked 235 Times in 149 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
EcuTek responded, I figured I would at least follow up with their response:
Quote:
I am still on B01C so far as I haven't noticed any problems myself outside of this, and I've been looking at logs quite closely the past couple days. I have DI nearly running a steady 4.5ms throughout pulls and I haven't observed any hiccups in my fine tuning of the PI ratios. I did have one problem but it was because I missed adjusting the PI ratio lower limit. Fueling is on target apart from that. This seems to be limited to closed loop operation, which would make sense and fall inline with EcuTek's description. @tomm.brz I've taken note of yours' and others' info about 10% difference in the VE tables on B01C. I am still running MAF because I am not running above wastegate again until I have rocker keepers, so I do not have a reason to try SD yet, but when I am more dialed I can do some tests and see what I find. I understand there are some issues with B01C but I am the type who likes to see/experience the problems before justifying changing something. I believe you about it, I just want to see it first. A good test will be taking A01C as well as a patched euro ROM and seeing if the intermittent 50% PI persists. I can try it sometime in the next couple weeks if anyone else cares to see the results. |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to BRZoomTX For This Useful Post: |
05-04-2021, 02:12 PM | #8 |
義理チョコ
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 31,867
Thanks: 52,127
Thanked 36,519 Times in 18,920 Posts
Mentioned: 1106 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
|
Just saw this thread. On seeing pics in your OP, my immediate thought was "Nice! Quick rinse cycle."
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ultramaroon For This Useful Post: | Dzmitry (05-07-2021) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Direct injection/port injection explained? | mike the snake | Software Tuning | 31 | 06-06-2021 06:17 PM |
Percentage of port injection and carbon build up | JIM THEO | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 9 | 01-08-2021 03:59 AM |
Port injection only possible? | solidsnake11 | Software Tuning | 22 | 01-10-2020 12:21 AM |
Is Port Injection more important when boosted? | KoolBRZ | Software Tuning | 24 | 03-17-2016 03:25 AM |