follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.


User Tag List
MisterSheep

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-13-2016, 09:02 PM   #99
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by johan View Post
Read the paragraph after the one you quoted. Look up the transcripts between congress and the EPA when the CAA was created and every time it was amended. If you're unwilling to do so and actually speak with authority on the matter, then please - walk away.

Ignoring the facts, ignoring the history and standing your ground when you have none to stand on - yes that makes you both ignorant and disrespectful - and I will call you on it because that sort of attitude, in our current apathetic world, will only make things worse. I find it incredibly offensive and honestly unacceptable on a forum like this where we are supposedly automotive enthusiasts. This change by the EPA is the beginning of the end for our sport and our culture, now is not the time to have our heads in the sand.

Thank God the people who actually matter in this argument are doing something about it. The automobile manufacturers are actually getting their own legal councils involved in fighting the EPA on this issue, so hopefully it will work out ok.
I'm glad you find me ignorant and disrespectful for voicing my own opinion.

I find you ignorant and disrespectful for ASSUMING I am taking this attitude towards what is happening, simply because I'm not waving the red flag as much as you are.

Just because I am not vocal on this issue in this thread, on this forum, does not mean I am not taking an active role in what is happening. Contrary to what you wish to believe, my current career is at stake.

But keep your ignorant and disrespectful views about me to yourself, please.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2016, 09:11 PM   #100
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultramaroon View Post
Alex, this piques my interest. Not a setup. What do you think are the right questions? I have mixed feelings on the subject.
Honestly?

Start by recognizing what the Clean Air Act is supposed to do. Then you realize that by virtue of the EPA making assumptions on what they interpret the CAA (and the "mobile emissions" amendments) to be, this will be a long fight that will end up in the courts.

Unless you or I won the Powerball tonight, not many of us will be able to fight this from a legal perspective. Next best thing is to post constructive comments about what this proposed rule change would do.

To keep the "taking racecars away from us" rhetoric going is actually creating a lot of noise and not focused on the subject manner. In an ideal world, we'd flood the EPA with constructive criticism or rebuttals, not just signing a petition on the White House website that frankly only will get us a response from them, nothing else of significance.

If you want to raise hell or just get others involved, share articles and opinions that are rooted in fact. Too many people just assume you can mod whatever you want with no restrictions... when this was never the case to begin with.

I think at the end of the day, pretty much everything I've seen in the past week is 95% noise and 5% actual constructive criticism/suggestions for what should be done differently. This needs to be where we should refocus our energies and voices, making the EPA hear us better.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mav1178 For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (02-14-2016)
Old 02-13-2016, 10:07 PM   #101
VitViper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: '15 FRS
Location: Oregon
Posts: 221
Thanks: 8
Thanked 280 Times in 127 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
I'm glad you find me ignorant and disrespectful for voicing my own opinion.

I find you ignorant and disrespectful for ASSUMING I am taking this attitude towards what is happening, simply because I'm not waving the red flag as much as you are.

Just because I am not vocal on this issue in this thread, on this forum, does not mean I am not taking an active role in what is happening. Contrary to what you wish to believe, my current career is at stake.

But keep your ignorant and disrespectful views about me to yourself, please.

-alex

The level of denial you are in is actually quite astounding.
VitViper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2016, 10:40 PM   #102
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,093 Times in 3,029 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitViper View Post
The level of denial you are in is actually quite astounding.
Please, tell me what I am in denial of?
I want to see what words are being put into my mouth.

-alex
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2016, 10:52 PM   #103
KR-S
Sporadic Member
 
KR-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Drives: 2016 Halo FR-S M/T
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,145
Thanks: 5,221
Thanked 3,552 Times in 1,746 Posts
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
Oh, boy... What did I just walk into...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by klearfade View Post
Is that gel in your hair?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by HueyLooie View Post
Nah, homes. It's your dadda's hot goopey goop.
KR-S is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KR-S For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (02-14-2016)
Old 02-14-2016, 01:54 AM   #104
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,366
Thanks: 13,733
Thanked 9,479 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitViper View Post
You can build a 1000hp drag EK Civic 4 cylinder with factory emissions equipment and a factory ECU?

You can build and tune a turbo drift car with a 100% stock ECU? Right, with no modifications to the ECU at all, you can just bolt on a turbo and go?
LOL sorry I am not on your level and dont think the only way to have fun is with 1,000 horsepower 22psi motors.

Plenty of drifting got done on stock powertrains and its not like it can't be done today.

As Enzo Ferrari said "aerodynamics is for those that can't build engines"


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2016, 02:02 AM   #105
Ultramaroon
義理チョコ
 
Ultramaroon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 31,871
Thanks: 52,137
Thanked 36,522 Times in 18,923 Posts
Mentioned: 1107 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
Honestly?
Of course. That's why I asked.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mav1178 View Post
To keep the "taking racecars away from us" rhetoric going is actually creating a lot of noise and not focused on the subject manner. In an ideal world, we'd flood the EPA with constructive criticism or rebuttals, not just signing a petition on the White House website that frankly only will get us a response from them, nothing else of significance.

If you want to raise hell or just get others involved, share articles and opinions that are rooted in fact. Too many people just assume you can mod whatever you want with no restrictions... when this was never the case to begin with.

I think at the end of the day, pretty much everything I've seen in the past week is 95% noise and 5% actual constructive criticism/suggestions for what should be done differently. This needs to be where we should refocus our energies and voices, making the EPA hear us better.

-alex
You've pretty much already said this. I was specifically wondering what, as an insider, you think the right questions are.

I'm not a fan of yanking the emissions control devices from anything that is registered for street use but if it's a track rat, seriously? You don't find focus on this area as a bit absurd?
__________________
Ultramaroon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2016, 02:07 AM   #106
Ultramaroon
義理チョコ
 
Ultramaroon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 31,871
Thanks: 52,137
Thanked 36,522 Times in 18,923 Posts
Mentioned: 1107 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
LOL sorry I am not on your level and dont think the only way to have fun is with 1,000 horsepower 22psi motors.

Plenty of drifting got done on stock powertrains and its not like it can't be done today.

As Enzo Ferrari said "aerodynamics is for those that can't build engines"


So you think it should all just be illegal across the board? I don't get it.
__________________
Ultramaroon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2016, 02:11 AM   #107
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,366
Thanks: 13,733
Thanked 9,479 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultramaroon View Post
So you think it should all just be illegal across the board? I don't get it.
I find the assertion that you can't have fun with an emissions compliant vehicle absolutely asinine.

I think that the old interpretation of the law should remain as is: vehicles that are used on public roads must comply with local emissions regulations, vehicles that are used only off public roads are either free to play or follow some restrictions (like dirt bikes and atvs are right now).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2016, 02:18 AM   #108
Ultramaroon
義理チョコ
 
Ultramaroon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 31,871
Thanks: 52,137
Thanked 36,522 Times in 18,923 Posts
Mentioned: 1107 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
I find the assertion that you can't have fun with an emissions compliant vehicle absolutely asinine.

I think that the old interpretation of the law should remain as is: vehicles that are used on public roads must comply with local emissions regulations, vehicles that are used only off road are either free to play or follow some restrictions (like dirt bikes and atvs are right now).
Again, no one said you can't have fun with an emissions compliant vehicle. Who's asserting that? I run bone stock but I don't cop an attitude about it. If I take the plates off of my DD and trailer it to the track I should be allowed to do whatever the fuck I want to the engine.
__________________
Ultramaroon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ultramaroon For This Useful Post:
Decay107 (02-14-2016), Sideways&Smiling (02-15-2016)
Old 02-14-2016, 02:26 AM   #109
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,366
Thanks: 13,733
Thanked 9,479 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultramaroon View Post
Again, no one said you can't have fun with an emissions compliant vehicle. Who's asserting that? I run bone stock but I don't cop an attitude about it. If I take the plates off of my DD and trailer it to the track I should be allowed to do whatever the fuck I want to the engine.
@VitVipers post set me off, I interpreted it as him saying it was the end of tracking because you couldn't modify your vehicle, I find it laughable hence my last two posts in the thread.


http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...8&postcount=88
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2016, 02:37 AM   #110
Ultramaroon
義理チョコ
 
Ultramaroon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 31,871
Thanks: 52,137
Thanked 36,522 Times in 18,923 Posts
Mentioned: 1107 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
@VitVipers post set me off, I interpreted it as him saying it was the end of tracking because you couldn't modify your vehicle, I find it laughable hence my last two posts in the thread.


http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...8&postcount=88
But I think people are talking past each other here. I really do think the EPA intends to clamp down on modification of street vehicles in all cases which I do assert is focusing new regulation efforts in completely the wrong area.

It really IS tragic.
__________________
Ultramaroon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ultramaroon For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (02-14-2016)
Old 02-14-2016, 05:27 AM   #111
why?
Only happy when it rains.
 
why?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: series.blue
Location: Harnett county NC
Posts: 1,995
Thanks: 5,698
Thanked 1,263 Times in 749 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
it is the EPA, they are not going to be happy until they control absolutely everything. they have screwed up royally time after time lately, have made complete and total fools of themselves, and are still going. They won't be happy until all modifications to cars are illegal.
why? is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to why? For This Useful Post:
Hoahao (02-14-2016)
Old 02-14-2016, 07:33 PM   #112
VitViper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: '15 FRS
Location: Oregon
Posts: 221
Thanks: 8
Thanked 280 Times in 127 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
LOL sorry I am not on your level and dont think the only way to have fun is with 1,000 horsepower 22psi motors.

Plenty of drifting got done on stock powertrains and its not like it can't be done today.

As Enzo Ferrari said "aerodynamics is for those that can't build engines"


So what you're saying is it's OK for the EPA to go after modifying street vehicles for track duty as long as it fits in with your narrow view of what is fun for you?

However you missed my one and only pretty blunt point:

With their proposed regulations they can and will go after not only companies cracking and exposing stock ECU's for end-user tuning (as well as injecting "custom maps" type code), but companies making complete stand alone ECU's. The ECU is technically an emissions control device.

Most factory ECU's aren't tuned ("programmed") with track use in mind -- meaning you're missing on a lot of features (look up the capabilities of race oriented ECU's from MoTec, etc). Our platform actually has a "plug and play" MoTeC package available that actually retains all the emissions controls like the stock ECU (even down to the EVAP purge control working), however under the EPA's proposed regulations the ECU swap would be illegal because it's not a "certified configuration".

Some people may enjoy tracking a completely unmodified vehicle... some don't (from my experience, most don't). You're OK with the EPA telling you what you can and can't do (IE, imposing themselves on your freedoms)?
VitViper is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
calm down guys, no need for insults


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EPA Prohibits Conversion of Road Cars to Racecars? TacoTacoBear Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 59 02-10-2016 02:10 PM
Government Shutdown effects? Hope y'all okay! HeubergerMotors Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 10 10-05-2013 09:24 PM
How The Government Killed Fuel Efficient Cars And Trucks rice_classic Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 21 03-16-2013 01:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.