2.5L with lower revs/more torque, or 2.0L with higher revs? - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

Superhatch · 08-22-2013, 10:55 PM

Assuming that Subaru/Toyota was listening to you, which would you choose? I think that these are both likely options as a high revving 2.5 is likely not in the works.

Choose wisely.

ATL BRZ · 08-22-2013, 11:01 PM

There is no replacement for displacement!

shu5892001 · 08-22-2013, 11:13 PM

I want a 2.5 high rev engine producing 250+ hp

mswhong · 08-22-2013, 11:21 PM

2.5 with less than 7400rpm? Is that what you're trying to imply?

ZDan · 08-22-2013, 11:23 PM

Gimme revs and displacement. No reason they can't make a 7400rpm 2.5 liter.

I went from a 7000rpm 2.4 liter I-6 in the Z to a 7000rpm 3.1 liter. BLISS!

The 6.0 liter in my FD spins to 7000 as well. Yee-haw!

Don't wanna hear about any 6500rpm 2.5

Captain Insano · 08-22-2013, 11:24 PM

Higher rev's with steady rising HP all the way to redline. I'm talking same as now upto and past 7400 to a 9k+ redline.

SpeedyJay · 08-22-2013, 11:36 PM

A proper header and tune seam to fix the torque problem, lowering the redline would really hurt the sporty feel of the car IMO.

I would be happy if the 2015 model came with a torque dip fix, and 8k redline and 230/240hp.

Genomaxter · 08-22-2013, 11:42 PM

Ill take higher revs and 2.0L. I want more specific output from a screamer. Its all in the intake manifold design.

Noob4Life · 08-22-2013, 11:44 PM

Considering I'm going SC, I'll take higher revs!

diss7 · 08-22-2013, 11:52 PM

Answer depends on weight difference of two options.

Kostamojen · 08-23-2013, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diss7

Answer depends on weight difference of two options.

Almost zilch.

diss7 · 08-23-2013, 12:19 AM

Then 2.5L for sure.

I spend 99% of the time in the rev range that would be positively influenced by an extra 500cc. If I had to give up 1000rpm for that, which I only use 1% of the time, I would.

Of course, I would rather have the best of both worlds; as others have indicated. But, sticking to the OP, I would go 2.5L and less revs.

lickitysplit · 08-23-2013, 12:34 AM

They already sell that car. Its called a WRX

continuecrushing · 08-23-2013, 12:48 AM

Everyone is going bonkers now that the 2015 rumor started...

However, if I'd have to choose, I'm with @ZDan, 7400+ and 2.5!

View Poll Results: Toyobaru asks...you respond?
2.5L, more torque, less revs.	92	45.32%
2.0L, same torque, more revs.	111	54.68%
Voters: 203. You may not vote on this poll

08-22-2013, 10:55 PM	#1
Superhatch AIM4APX Join Date: Jun 2012 Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ Limited Location: Milwaukee Posts: 1,206 Thanks: 642 Thanked 749 Times in 324 Posts Mentioned: 8 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	2.5L with lower revs/more torque, or 2.0L with higher revs? Assuming that Subaru/Toyota was listening to you, which would you choose? I think that these are both likely options as a high revving 2.5 is likely not in the works. Choose wisely. __________________ "It's very difficult to present technology as an overtly positive sales device to people who want an emotional car" -Chris Harris

08-22-2013, 11:01 PM	#2
ATL BRZ Driving Coach Join Date: Jun 2012 Drives: BRZ Location: Atlanta Posts: 3,666 Thanks: 3,723 Thanked 4,137 Times in 1,707 Posts Mentioned: 90 Post(s) Tagged: 6 Thread(s)	There is no replacement for displacement! __________________ __________________________Pure Motorsport: JDL Turbo BRZ Track Build_______________________

08-22-2013, 11:44 PM	#9
Noob4Life 86 Noob Join Date: Dec 2012 Drives: Firestorm FR-S Location: Yuba City, CA Posts: 596 Thanks: 153 Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts Mentioned: 8 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Considering I'm going SC, I'll take higher revs! __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Where do you keep your revs?	ScionFrsFan	Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum	54	06-11-2015 12:07 AM
higher Boost?	Scalzo	Forced Induction	19	09-10-2014 05:20 PM
Where can i get fuel higher than 91?	XPR Small Block	Northern California	22	03-24-2013 09:56 AM
AT holding 2nd gear to high revs during a long left turn	EK_Golfer	Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum	9	03-01-2013 10:35 AM
AC cuts out at high revs. Cool feature?	Superhatch	BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics	9	06-28-2012 02:13 PM

08-22-2013, 11:13 PM	#3
shu5892001 Ontario's FT86 Join Date: Aug 2012 Drives: 2016 Lexus GS-F Location: Toronto Posts: 684 Thanks: 261 Thanked 165 Times in 111 Posts Mentioned: 2 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I want a 2.5 high rev engine producing 250+ hp

08-22-2013, 11:21 PM	#4
mswhong Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Drives: FT86 Location: AUS Posts: 253 Thanks: 83 Thanked 64 Times in 45 Posts Mentioned: 2 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	2.5 with less than 7400rpm? Is that what you're trying to imply?

08-22-2013, 11:23 PM	#5
ZDan Senior Member Join Date: May 2011 Drives: '23 BRZ Location: Providence, RI Posts: 4,584 Thanks: 1,377 Thanked 3,891 Times in 2,032 Posts Mentioned: 85 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Gimme revs and displacement. No reason they can't make a 7400rpm 2.5 liter. I went from a 7000rpm 2.4 liter I-6 in the Z to a 7000rpm 3.1 liter. BLISS! The 6.0 liter in my FD spins to 7000 as well. Yee-haw! Don't wanna hear about any 6500rpm 2.5

08-22-2013, 11:24 PM	#6
Captain Insano Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Drives: 2014 Jeep Wrangler RubiconX Location: Midwest, USA Posts: 1,282 Thanks: 110 Thanked 292 Times in 224 Posts Mentioned: 7 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Higher rev's with steady rising HP all the way to redline. I'm talking same as now upto and past 7400 to a 9k+ redline.

08-22-2013, 11:36 PM	#7
SpeedyJay Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Drives: '13 WRB BRZ Location: Calgary, AB Posts: 156 Thanks: 24 Thanked 46 Times in 37 Posts Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	A proper header and tune seam to fix the torque problem, lowering the redline would really hurt the sporty feel of the car IMO. I would be happy if the 2015 model came with a torque dip fix, and 8k redline and 230/240hp.

08-22-2013, 11:42 PM	#8
Genomaxter Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Drives: 2013 firestorm FRS Location: Slidell Posts: 147 Thanks: 3 Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts Mentioned: 4 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Ill take higher revs and 2.0L. I want more specific output from a screamer. Its all in the intake manifold design.

08-22-2013, 11:52 PM	#10
diss7 Banned Join Date: Sep 2012 Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27 Location: Christchurch NZ Posts: 1,478 Thanks: 826 Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts Mentioned: 33 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Answer depends on weight difference of two options.

08-23-2013, 12:19 AM	#12
diss7 Banned Join Date: Sep 2012 Drives: AE86, 2x GT86, TE27 Location: Christchurch NZ Posts: 1,478 Thanks: 826 Thanked 1,179 Times in 522 Posts Mentioned: 33 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Then 2.5L for sure. I spend 99% of the time in the rev range that would be positively influenced by an extra 500cc. If I had to give up 1000rpm for that, which I only use 1% of the time, I would. Of course, I would rather have the best of both worlds; as others have indicated. But, sticking to the OP, I would go 2.5L and less revs.

08-23-2013, 12:34 AM	#13
lickitysplit Don't care Join Date: Aug 2013 Drives: 2013 Whiteout FRS Location: Texas Posts: 233 Thanks: 3 Thanked 62 Times in 48 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	They already sell that car. Its called a WRX

08-23-2013, 12:48 AM	#14
continuecrushing Join Date: Mar 2013 Drives: 2013 Firestorm FRS Location: Lake Elsinore, CA Posts: 2,707 Thanks: 1,231 Thanked 2,144 Times in 1,003 Posts Mentioned: 73 Post(s) Tagged: 2 Thread(s)	Everyone is going bonkers now that the 2015 rumor started... However, if I'd have to choose, I'm with @ZDan, 7400+ and 2.5!

User Name		Remember Me?
Password