follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-21-2014, 02:01 PM   #1
puma
crew chief
 
puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Race car FR-S
Location: Quebec
Posts: 378
Thanks: 6
Thanked 189 Times in 82 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
removing charcoal canister?

If i wanted to remove the emission system completly and take out the charcoal canister and the pump module, what woud you do after? Do i just plug the unused lines at the tank? Should the tank be vented so it doesn't pressurize? Would the tank pressurize or become in a vacuum when the level lowers?


thanks for any insight and in case you are wondering it is to build a race car and we are faily new at this. We don't want to use a fuel cell yet.
puma is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to puma For This Useful Post:
ThisGuy919 (04-28-2014)
Old 04-21-2014, 04:20 PM   #2
350matt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: toyota mr2/ Toyota GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 438
Thanks: 3
Thanked 140 Times in 92 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The fuel filler cap has a 1 way valve in it to allow air in to prevent a vacuum

but yes the purge system vents tank pressure into the engine inlet so prevents it building up on a hot day which can be dangerous

so just blanking off the tank vents probably isn't a good idea

in the days before purge systems the tank was vented through a charcoal cannister and out to atomosphere under the car

and before the days of charcoal cannisters the tank was just vented and breathed through the cap
350matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2014, 05:45 PM   #3
puma
crew chief
 
puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Race car FR-S
Location: Quebec
Posts: 378
Thanks: 6
Thanked 189 Times in 82 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
just checked the manual, there is a cut off valve on top of the tank with the vent, anyone knows exactly how it works, the drawing is weird and the way it is done on top, i have a hard time figuring out how the cut off valve will prevent fuel to come down that tube in case of a roll over.
puma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2014, 11:43 PM   #4
Poodles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2015 Series.Blue
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,781
Thanks: 88
Thanked 781 Times in 481 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It's a bit more complex than that, but are you going with a fuel cell and that's why you're getting rid of it? If not, there's no reason to even mess with the system.


Gas cap has a one way check valve, and the valve that vents to the CC canister usually has a 2psi or so spring in it. Once the engine is up to operating temp, it starts to take the vapor from the tank into the motor (charcoal will both absorb and release the vapors). Keep in mind the pressures (fully closed off system is going to cause odd fuel pressures, and the 2psi helps prevent cavitation of the fuel pump).
Poodles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2014, 01:15 AM   #5
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,872
Thanks: 28,793
Thanked 31,825 Times in 16,428 Posts
Mentioned: 708 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 350matt View Post
............

in the days before purge systems the tank was vented through a charcoal cannister and out to atomosphere under the car

and before the days of charcoal cannisters the tank was just vented and breathed through the cap
......and before that ..... the horse just farted ......

(yes, I know .... time fer ma meds .... )


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to humfrz For This Useful Post:
bobio64 (04-24-2014), burdickjp (07-19-2015), Calum (04-24-2014), new2subaru (11-24-2015)
Old 04-24-2014, 07:02 AM   #6
puma
crew chief
 
puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Race car FR-S
Location: Quebec
Posts: 378
Thanks: 6
Thanked 189 Times in 82 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poodles View Post
It's a bit more complex than that, but are you going with a fuel cell and that's why you're getting rid of it? If not, there's no reason to even mess with the system.


Gas cap has a one way check valve, and the valve that vents to the CC canister usually has a 2psi or so spring in it. Once the engine is up to operating temp, it starts to take the vapor from the tank into the motor (charcoal will both absorb and release the vapors). Keep in mind the pressures (fully closed off system is going to cause odd fuel pressures, and the 2psi helps prevent cavitation of the fuel pump).
i am not going with a fuel cell for the moment, i want to get rid of it because i want to remove as much weight as possible and make the system as simple as can be.

i beleive that from the look of it, i can just remove everything and leave the line unplugged so that the tank will vent itself. There seem to be a one way valve on top that would prevent fuel leakage in case of a roll over.

I have a spare tank on hand, i will do some testings.
puma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2014, 08:07 AM   #7
arghx7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: car
Location: cold
Posts: 599
Thanks: 72
Thanked 607 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I've deleted charcoal canisters and vented evap lines on older cars. It had a noticeable smell on a hot day when the fuel heats up, kind of like an open vent on a gas can for a lawn mower. This was a return PFI fuel system. Your experience may vary.
arghx7 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to arghx7 For This Useful Post:
Aaron_blatherwick (04-24-2014)
Old 04-25-2014, 12:43 AM   #8
Poodles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2015 Series.Blue
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,781
Thanks: 88
Thanked 781 Times in 481 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by puma View Post
i am not going with a fuel cell for the moment, i want to get rid of it because i want to remove as much weight as possible and make the system as simple as can be.

i beleive that from the look of it, i can just remove everything and leave the line unplugged so that the tank will vent itself. There seem to be a one way valve on top that would prevent fuel leakage in case of a roll over.

I have a spare tank on hand, i will do some testings.


Components of the system are light, and removal would cause an MIL. Last time I messed with a modern system like this the components weighed less than a healthy #2...


I'd like personally look elsewhere to lighten things up.
Poodles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2014, 01:13 AM   #9
stugray
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 GBS BRZ Limited
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 627
Thanked 1,445 Times in 711 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
1 - You are so serious about building a racecar that you want to shed a couple of extra pounds that are fairly important to the operation of the system and makes the vehicle less safe.

2 - You are not serious enough about racing that you dismiss the need for a real fuel cell.

Those two statements seem self-contradictory.

My vintage racecar has a fuel cell that cost all of about $350..
stugray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:59 PM   #10
puma
crew chief
 
puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Race car FR-S
Location: Quebec
Posts: 378
Thanks: 6
Thanked 189 Times in 82 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
For those who actually care, i ended up doing some test with a spare tank we have and filled it up with water. We removed all the charcoal canister and pump lines and turned the tank upside down to see if we would get a leak through the vent line. We didn't get a single drop so the cut off valve really does it's job. To make sure we didn't get any fuel vapor coming inside the cabin we used the vent line that goes near the gas cap and connected both together. We are also eliminating the line that went to the front of the car.

here is a pic for further reference if someone ever has the need to do something like this.

puma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 12:25 AM   #11
Poodles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2015 Series.Blue
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,781
Thanks: 88
Thanked 781 Times in 481 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
If you attached the vent line that goes to the gas cap (which is actually behind the cap and is used for vapor recovery while fueling) to the actual vent line, you've sealed the tank...making essentially a bomb.
Poodles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 06:26 AM   #12
puma
crew chief
 
puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Race car FR-S
Location: Quebec
Posts: 378
Thanks: 6
Thanked 189 Times in 82 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
no it is the line that goes to the fuel filler but isn't going inside the fuel cap, just under, i beleive originally it is the line to bring air in the tank when it goes in vacuum.

the one you are talking about is like 1/4

here is the diagram, i beleive it is the line between #8 (air filter) and the gas door

puma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 06:49 AM   #13
puma
crew chief
 
puma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: Race car FR-S
Location: Quebec
Posts: 378
Thanks: 6
Thanked 189 Times in 82 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
just went in the garage and took a pic, here is where the line ends up

puma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 09:21 AM   #14
stugray
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: 2013 GBS BRZ Limited
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 627
Thanked 1,445 Times in 711 Posts
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Sorry to be a PITA, but if you are willing to sacrifice safety for a few hundred $$, then you cannot afford a real racecar.

A real fuel cell will cost about as much as a good set of tires, or are you planning on not buying tires either?
stugray is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DC Sports Dual Canister Exhuast Robert95g Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 13 03-29-2016 12:28 AM
FS: STI Enkei Charcoal Black 17x7.5 Gambit Australia Classifieds 15 07-18-2014 11:44 AM
Fs: oem brz charcoal grey bumper Guildjs Exterior Parts (Aero, Lighting, Etc.) 3 04-14-2014 04:11 AM
Intake canister part number? utekineir Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 5 09-10-2013 01:42 PM
DC SPORTS DCS-Dual Canister Cat-Back ?? mit_peid Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 4 05-23-2013 10:56 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.