follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-01-2018, 06:01 AM   #15
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Also log fuel system status see if its switching between cl and ol


Oft v4 have zeroed or reduced the ol\cl timers and fhe ol and cl fuel maps are way different
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 07:53 AM   #16
QTR FMS
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: brz
Location: socal
Posts: 81
Thanks: 10
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Eyo View Post
This is after about 4 days on this tune:
https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-....14&tmax=14.89
AFR is from the stock sensor.

So looks like i'm just shifting at the wrong times and/or with the wrong throttle angle.

i cant see anything from the datalog other than maybe the short fuel trim might too high but not sure if this is your issue,
save your maf scale for a backup and try rescaling your maf using this method you dont need the excel spreedsheet just multiply by percent to your maf scale and see if it gets better if not we will need to look at more stuff, it could be torque calculation issue or something but i dont know any thing about auto trans tuning



[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP4BgKoRvQo[/ame]
QTR FMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2018, 08:48 AM   #17
DarkPira7e
Rust bucket enthusiast
 
DarkPira7e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2013 Turbo Firestorm FRS
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,932
Thanks: 3,198
Thanked 4,095 Times in 2,045 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tor View Post
Try to log ignition timing. Could be too much transient ignition retard.

When you make the log, do something identifiable after you experience the bucking so it's easy to pinpoint where in the log it happens. E.g. you could go full throttle a few seconds after it happens, conditions permitting. Then it's easy to find in the log.
This was the issue with my tune. I use Tactrix + BRZEdit and found that too transient ing. retard or ramping it up suddenly makes the throttle extremely jumpy. Even cruise control make me look like I was at an Amon Amarth concert
DarkPira7e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2018, 01:27 AM   #18
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkPira7e View Post
This was the issue with my tune. I use Tactrix + BRZEdit and found that too transient ing. retard or ramping it up suddenly makes the throttle extremely jumpy. Even cruise control make me look like I was at an Amon Amarth concert
I think it's this too. You can check the ignition advance in the log I linked in post #4. How much is really needed? How much is too much/unsafe to remove?

The v4.03 Stg 1 transient retard table is not smooth at all; i was thinking about taking a lot of the retard out to help smooth it out.

I tend to shift out of 1st at around 2-2.5k between 0.5 and 0.7 g/rev.
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2018, 01:56 AM   #19
jflogerzi
Senior Member
 
jflogerzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Series 10 6MT FR-S
Location: Moreno Valley, CA
Posts: 5,526
Thanks: 1,999
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,456 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Eyo View Post
This is after about 4 days on this tune:
https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-....14&tmax=14.89
AFR is from the stock sensor.

So looks like i'm just shifting at the wrong times and/or with the wrong throttle angle.
Am I missing something? That log looks pretty damn good to me...
__________________
2013 Series 10 FRS #553
RCE T2's, SPC LCAs -4/2.6 camber
JDL 4-2-1 EL, FP and OP, Tuned by Zach@CSG on e85
RR Wilwood Front/Rear Sport BBK, Motul 600 Fluid
ARC-8 17x9 SX2 GTs 245s/Koing 17x8 v730's 225's
jflogerzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2018, 02:11 AM   #20
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jflogerzi View Post
Am I missing something? That log looks pretty damn good to me...
Thanks. This was just to show that I don't think it's a bad MAF cal. Reducing low end throttle tip in enrichment in this tune seemed to help with the bucking a bit.
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr_Eyo For This Useful Post:
jflogerzi (11-02-2018)
Old 11-02-2018, 08:52 AM   #21
DarkPira7e
Rust bucket enthusiast
 
DarkPira7e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2013 Turbo Firestorm FRS
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,932
Thanks: 3,198
Thanked 4,095 Times in 2,045 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Eyo View Post
I think it's this too. You can check the ignition advance in the log I linked in post #4. How much is really needed? How much is too much/unsafe to remove?

The v4.03 Stg 1 transient retard table is not smooth at all; i was thinking about taking a lot of the retard out to help smooth it out.

I tend to shift out of 1st at around 2-2.5k between 0.5 and 0.7 g/rev.
I'll be honest, I can't really give a good idea what a good amount of advance or retard would be, it's something we played with until it felt right. After seeing that, I can say confidently that in 1st and second, shifting below 4,000 rpm makes the car buck for me regardless of the tune most of the time. Changing how aggressive the throttle input is in the calibration helped with this, but I'm going to be getting a trans and diff mount to see if it helps. I have driven a friend's car that doesn't do it, do I don't think it's my choice in driving style.
DarkPira7e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2018, 03:19 AM   #22
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I captured a log with the bucking while upshifting into 3rd with ignition and port/direct IPWs:
https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-...zoom=5108-5162

Observations:
-The bucking is causing my foot to open the throttle a little more in a feedback loop. It shouldn't be enough to trigger tip-in enrichment, but it looks like it is causing the load to wildly vary.
-Fueling mode is CL the whole way.
-The port inject fraction table in this region is either 0%, 25%, or 50%. The log shows flip-flopping between all DI and some PI.
-Looking at the upshift to 2nd immediately prior, there is no injector mode flip-flop during the accel, it's all DI in 2nd. It was PI/DI in 1st.

Possible conclusion: the injector mode toggling is causing the jerkiness. If this is true, what can I do to smooth out the PI fraction table and not impact power or knocking?
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2018, 04:04 AM   #23
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Eyo View Post
The port inject fraction table in this region is either 0%, 25%, or 50%. The log shows flip-flopping between all DI and some PI.

Possible conclusion: the injector mode toggling is causing the jerkiness. If this is true, what can I do to smooth out the PI fraction table and not impact power or knocking?
Check the thresholds on the PI ratio table. Stock it's set to 35% min and 5000rpm IIRC. This means you have either 35%+ or 0% PI up until 5000rpm. Not sure if the OFT changes this. There is a load limit as well, set to 1.5.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2018, 04:53 AM   #24
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,064 Times in 773 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
i usually use 0.9-1 load limit, 25 or 30% threshold and 3200 rpm, i m good with it
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2018, 05:29 AM   #25
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
Check the thresholds on the PI ratio table. Stock it's set to 35% min and 5000rpm IIRC. This means you have either 35%+ or 0% PI up until 5000rpm. Not sure if the OFT changes this. There is a load limit as well, set to 1.5.
OFT goes down to 30%. It also has a minimum PI quantity limit of 2.28 -- not sure if this is mL or ms. Looking at my log, it doesn't look like its ms. Looks like I can only go down to 30% in the PI ratio table for non-zero PI? If true, what are the implications of staying DI-only?
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2018, 06:05 AM   #26
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,064 Times in 773 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
try
25%
3200rpm
load 0.9
minimum PI 1.5

i also lower PI scaling from 228 to 224, but not fundamental
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2018, 06:54 AM   #27
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Eyo View Post
OFT goes down to 30%.
Not in the PI table but the PI threshold settings.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2018, 04:10 PM   #28
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
Not in the PI table but the PI threshold settings.
I don't see it in the OFT defs.
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
E85 OFT tune Bucking/surging Vmax911 Software Tuning 5 07-30-2017 03:27 AM
Horrible bucking and shutter after clutch install Scikotic Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 32 07-12-2016 08:10 PM
2-3K RPM hesitation/bucking - logged 86fun Software Tuning 5 01-29-2016 08:58 AM
Today, my car made a violent bucking sound on start up... lupindub Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 3 11-28-2015 09:27 PM
loss of power/ bucking in rain fasteddy Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 30 10-20-2015 02:08 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.