follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-10-2016, 01:54 PM   #29
FRS Justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 994
Thanks: 693
Thanked 695 Times in 417 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallenj View Post
Thanks for the help. Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I got out of all the help is get the 5858 with a big a/r and launch control and I should be good. But shouldn't I just go with a 6262 they are the same price and if I ever want to make more power the turbo has a lot of room to make more power. Just want the experts opinions on this. Lag doesn't really matter I'll get the trap speed from the spool go big or go home, but I could be completely wrong. I don't have any experience with turbos only cubic inches.
You have to hook the car up along with making the power.. Hooking up and hitting a 10s pass with a 5858 is far easier than a 6262...
I have a 6266 on the street if I roll on the gas I can fog the tires all the way to 4th gear. That's cruising at 2k and rolling on the gas at 4k I'm up in smoke...
I bolted the slicks on it the other day and went for a cruise 3rd gear broke loose mid way. You won't have these problem with a 5858. If your spinning your not winning. A 5858 is much more controllable and way easier to put the power to the ground. Oh and by the way I was on a 7psi wastegate spring...
Ultimately the choice is yours, but if I wanted to do what you want to do I would hands down get a 5858. A 10s pass is no joke.

Now with this being said a 6262 with the smallest housing will be equivalent to a 5858 but you will loose top end choking it down. That's why I would suggest the 5858 you will get the best of both worlds.
__________________
Instagram FT86PROJECT9S
Facebook FT86PROJECT9S
710whp
FRS Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2016, 02:30 PM   #30
dallenj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Grey FR-S
Location: OKC
Posts: 157
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRS Justin View Post
You have to hook the car up along with making the power.. Hooking up and hitting a 10s pass with a 5858 is far easier than a 6262...
I have a 6266 on the street if I roll on the gas I can fog the tires all the way to 4th gear. That's cruising at 2k and rolling on the gas at 4k I'm up in smoke...
I bolted the slicks on it the other day and went for a cruise 3rd gear broke loose mid way. You won't have these problem with a 5858. If your spinning your not winning. A 5858 is much more controllable and way easier to put the power to the ground. Oh and by the way I was on a 7psi wastegate spring...
Ultimately the choice is yours, but if I wanted to do what you want to do I would hands down get a 5858. A 10s pass is no joke.

Now with this being said a 6262 with the smallest housing will be equivalent to a 5858 but you will loose top end choking it down. That's why I would suggest the 5858 you will get the best of both worlds.
Thanks a lot I'll go with the 5858. What turbine housing should I use to get the best times? I do want to use the 3" v-band discharge should i go for the 64 or 82?
dallenj is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dallenj For This Useful Post:
FRS Justin (05-10-2016), Kris86 (05-11-2016)
Old 05-10-2016, 02:39 PM   #31
mrk1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Sterling BRZ Ltd
Location: New England
Posts: 1,702
Thanks: 403
Thanked 1,389 Times in 671 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
.82
__________________
The Build Thread

GT28RS - eBoost2 - 3.91 Final Drive - Supra LSD
mrk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mrk1 For This Useful Post:
#maverick# (05-10-2016), FRS Justin (05-10-2016), Kris86 (05-11-2016)
Old 05-10-2016, 02:53 PM   #32
dallenj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Grey FR-S
Location: OKC
Posts: 157
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
How do you guys combat the transmission going through gears other than having a spare one lying around? I already have problem with my 4thr gear and I'm only running 300hp
dallenj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2016, 02:56 PM   #33
#maverick#
Senior Member
 
#maverick#'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2006 Pontiac GP (SOLD), 2014 FR-S
Location: Chicago
Posts: 378
Thanks: 296
Thanked 145 Times in 113 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallenj View Post
How do you guys combat the transmission going through gears other than having a spare one lying around? I already have problem with my 4thr gear and I'm only running 300hp
Theyre cheap enough, Justin and I both have access to a couple each lol. I only just recently broke my first though, which was surprising.
__________________
"Project cars are like New Years Eve. Endless preparation, hype, a sleepless night of fun, followed promptly by massive headaches and regret." - Anonymous
#maverick# is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to #maverick# For This Useful Post:
FRS Justin (05-10-2016)
Old 05-11-2016, 02:21 PM   #34
Kris86
Senior Member
 
Kris86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: RHD Gt86
Location: Antigua, west indies
Posts: 365
Thanks: 614
Thanked 100 Times in 74 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Don't mean to hijack the thread but, what the comparison like between the pte5858 vs the gtx3076r?

Like hp ratings, full boost at what rpm etc
__________________
Toyota - Making Dreams A Reality

461hp on 91octane - JDL turbo GTX3076r GEN 2 - Mazworx CD009 transmission
Kris86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2016, 02:27 PM   #35
FRS Justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 994
Thanks: 693
Thanked 695 Times in 417 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris86 View Post
Don't mean to hijack the thread but, what the comparison like between the pte5858 vs the gtx3076r?

Like hp ratings, full boost at what rpm etc
They are almost identical, 58-76 trim. Actually the 3076 is a 76.60 and the 5858 is a 76 trim
__________________
Instagram FT86PROJECT9S
Facebook FT86PROJECT9S
710whp
FRS Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FRS Justin For This Useful Post:
Kris86 (05-11-2016), NyC Zn6 (05-11-2016)
Old 05-11-2016, 02:31 PM   #36
Kris86
Senior Member
 
Kris86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: RHD Gt86
Location: Antigua, west indies
Posts: 365
Thanks: 614
Thanked 100 Times in 74 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRS Justin View Post
They are almost identical, 58-76 trim. Actually the 3076 is a 76.60 and the 5858 is a 76 trim
Thanks for ur reply,

Which turbo do you think can take more harassment, stronger
__________________
Toyota - Making Dreams A Reality

461hp on 91octane - JDL turbo GTX3076r GEN 2 - Mazworx CD009 transmission
Kris86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kris86 For This Useful Post:
FRS Justin (05-11-2016)
Old 05-12-2016, 08:24 AM   #37
GsxrMe
Senior Member
 
GsxrMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Drives: Late 2014 Subaru BRZ
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 557
Thanks: 20
Thanked 183 Times in 139 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris86 View Post
Thanks for ur reply,

Which turbo do you think can take more harassment, stronger
Both are around the 620-640 hp mark. I know the gtx3076r uses water lines. Not sure about the 5858.
__________________
2014 Subaru BRZ
FBM Turbokit: GTX3076R - ECUTEK HRI FlexFuel tune - FBM 3" Turboback Exhaust - 550cc Injectors - Walbro 485 Fuel Pump - 4bar Map Sensor - FBM Oil Pan - ACT SB7-XTSS - AMSOIL all fluids - Forester XT Oil Cooler - Cusco engine, trans mounts - Whiteline rear differential bushings - Perrin shifter bushing - Firehawk 235/45/17 - AEM Failsafe
GsxrMe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GsxrMe For This Useful Post:
Kris86 (05-12-2016)
Old 05-12-2016, 09:45 AM   #38
FRS Justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 994
Thanks: 693
Thanked 695 Times in 417 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GsxrMe View Post
Both are around the 620-640 hp mark. I know the gtx3076r uses water lines. Not sure about the 5858.
The 5858 has ceramic ball bearing and is oil cooled. Back in the day precision turbos had a high failure rate but they got their shit together and now are making awesome turbos. Garrett has been the standard forever... Cant go wrong with either the 5858 or the gtx3076r...
__________________
Instagram FT86PROJECT9S
Facebook FT86PROJECT9S
710whp
FRS Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2016, 05:55 PM   #39
#maverick#
Senior Member
 
#maverick#'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2006 Pontiac GP (SOLD), 2014 FR-S
Location: Chicago
Posts: 378
Thanks: 296
Thanked 145 Times in 113 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
PTE makes a little more power top end from what ive seen and gtx turbos make better power mid range for whatever reason
__________________
"Project cars are like New Years Eve. Endless preparation, hype, a sleepless night of fun, followed promptly by massive headaches and regret." - Anonymous
#maverick# is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2016, 01:40 PM   #40
dallenj
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: Grey FR-S
Location: OKC
Posts: 157
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRS Justin View Post
You have to hook the car up along with making the power.. Hooking up and hitting a 10s pass with a 5858 is far easier than a 6262...
I have a 6266 on the street if I roll on the gas I can fog the tires all the way to 4th gear. That's cruising at 2k and rolling on the gas at 4k I'm up in smoke...
I bolted the slicks on it the other day and went for a cruise 3rd gear broke loose mid way. You won't have these problem with a 5858. If your spinning your not winning. A 5858 is much more controllable and way easier to put the power to the ground. Oh and by the way I was on a 7psi wastegate spring...
Ultimately the choice is yours, but if I wanted to do what you want to do I would hands down get a 5858. A 10s pass is no joke.

Now with this being said a 6262 with the smallest housing will be equivalent to a 5858 but you will loose top end choking it down. That's why I would suggest the 5858 you will get the best of both worlds.

I'm looking to get the 5858 v-band inlet and outlet with the .82 a/r, but do you know if v-band inlet will be better or would sticking with a T3 inlet be better. Also do you know the inlet size of the v-band inlet i have looked everywhere for the info with no luck.Thanks for all the help.
dallenj is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dallenj For This Useful Post:
#maverick# (05-13-2016)
Old 05-13-2016, 02:20 PM   #41
FRS Justin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FRS
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 994
Thanks: 693
Thanked 695 Times in 417 Posts
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallenj View Post
I'm looking to get the 5858 v-band inlet and outlet with the .82 a/r, but do you know if v-band inlet will be better or would sticking with a T3 inlet be better. Also do you know the inlet size of the v-band inlet i have looked everywhere for the info with no luck.Thanks for all the help.
@Maverick is your best source for this info or @mrk1
I believe Maverick ran a 5858 vband
__________________
Instagram FT86PROJECT9S
Facebook FT86PROJECT9S
710whp
FRS Justin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FRS Justin For This Useful Post:
#maverick# (05-13-2016)
Old 05-13-2016, 04:00 PM   #42
#maverick#
Senior Member
 
#maverick#'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2006 Pontiac GP (SOLD), 2014 FR-S
Location: Chicago
Posts: 378
Thanks: 296
Thanked 145 Times in 113 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallenj View Post
I'm looking to get the 5858 v-band inlet and outlet with the .82 a/r, but do you know if v-band inlet will be better or would sticking with a T3 inlet be better. Also do you know the inlet size of the v-band inlet i have looked everywhere for the info with no luck.Thanks for all the help.
The Vband inlet is the same size as a t3 inlet. I ran the vband and loved it. Plus a vband is much lighter than a bulky ass t3 flange
__________________
"Project cars are like New Years Eve. Endless preparation, hype, a sleepless night of fun, followed promptly by massive headaches and regret." - Anonymous
#maverick# is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Perrin Crank Pulley, Precision Turbo PW39 Wastegate - SOLD Amir Ghadiri Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 7 02-07-2016 08:59 PM
SOLD Precision Turbo tumbla.jr Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 2 05-21-2015 10:15 PM
Invida n1 exhaust motiv overpipe injen intake precision 4854 turbo for sale Anthony7515 Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 7 09-16-2014 10:28 PM
9 SEC -PRECISION 6466 SUB-ZERO MOTORS FT86 CUSTOM TURBO KIT , ENGINE BUILT 600WHP+ SUB-ZERO Forced Induction 44 07-09-2014 09:44 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.