follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2018, 05:57 PM   #1779
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshoobaroo View Post
Thanks so much!

Wayne's website claims it's both AFR numbers that get skewed, but I can log with my obd reader to compare and make sure.

I did notice the rich spot as well. I'll give the MAF scale tool a shot!
It's possible that he claimed that the O2 sensor scale made it read off, not that the OFT reading was incorrect. You would get the same readings on other devices due to this.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2018, 07:09 PM   #1780
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
It's possible that he claimed that the O2 sensor scale made it read off, not that the OFT reading was incorrect. You would get the same readings on other devices due to this.
actually Wayne really says on his website that OFT logs incorrectly also the actual afr.. but that s wronf, actual afr is logged good with OFT, just the target afr is offset
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2018, 01:47 PM   #1781
Adamf220
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: 2013 frs
Location: michigan
Posts: 96
Thanks: 14
Thanked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Can I have someone take a look at my datalog, Im using a revworks catless header, nameless midpipe, Injen catback, and a Injen intake. Im using a OFT with the stage 2+ catless tune. Just want to make sure everything looks ok dont really know what im looking at. 3rd gear pull

https://datazap.me/u/adamf220/log-15...ta=1-9&solo=13

Last edited by Adamf220; 09-07-2018 at 02:01 PM.
Adamf220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2018, 03:17 AM   #1782
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Got a log here with 3 3rd gear pulls after attempting to scale my MAF. Would appreciate a review. Thanks.

https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-....18&tmax=15.01
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2018, 04:19 AM   #1783
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
you have OFT right? you actually want the "afr" to be 0.2 lower than "command afr" because oft ha some kind of strange offset to the command afr, it s always logged 0.2 leaner than the misured afr


also check your ignition timing, you are having -4 flkc, that s definitely knocking hard, also log the Advance multiplier
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2018, 06:45 AM   #1784
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post

also check your ignition timing, you are having -4 flkc, that s definitely knocking hard, also log the Advance multiplier
Thanks. I'm stuck on Kodename47's instructions for filtering the logs in vgi's tool. Not sure what the filter criteria are: AND the 3 together? Also, what is the limit criteria for the IAM drop?
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2018, 07:08 AM   #1785
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
sorry i m not following you in what you are talking about


afr and maf scaling seem good, but i would make all richer up from 3v of maf voltage of 1%



anyway the AM drop is difficult to understand, i think from what i read in ecutek's pdfs, am drop when flkc collects an amount of ign retard (for example in your log -4.8 at 5600rpm that btw is VERY bad and you should fix it asap in your base timing B table) that is more or equal than the half of the value in the Knock corr A table on the same engine speed/load cell
i think you could have definitely an AM drop on that log but you didn t log the Adv multiplier value


remove Wideband afr from the logs, that doesnt work, and add Adv multiplier
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2018, 11:55 PM   #1786
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post
sorry i m not following you in what you are talking about


afr and maf scaling seem good, but i would make all richer up from 3v of maf voltage of 1%



anyway the AM drop is difficult to understand, i think from what i read in ecutek's pdfs, am drop when flkc collects an amount of ign retard (for example in your log -4.8 at 5600rpm that btw is VERY bad and you should fix it asap in your base timing B table) that is more or equal than the half of the value in the Knock corr A table on the same engine speed/load cell
i think you could have definitely an AM drop on that log but you didn t log the Adv multiplier value


remove Wideband afr from the logs, that doesnt work, and add Adv multiplier

Thanks @tomm.brz.

3 new logs:
https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-...og=0&data=1-12
https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-...1&data=1-11-12
https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-...2&data=1-11-12

-I enriched the MAF scale above 3V by 1.5%.
-I updated the base timing B table per your directions.


A couple observations of my own:
1. The knock above 4k is greatly reduced but not completely eliminated.
2. I see some knock at low RPMs (<3k). How much timing should I pull for this and the bit of knocking above?
3. IAM did not dip below 1 during the knocking.
4. AFR is not that much below commanded AFR in OL mode. Should I enrich the MAF cal a little more?
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2018, 03:39 AM   #1787
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
what tune are you using? which header?


am DID drop, on log wot1, you can see am went to 0.88
maybe enrich the maf just a liiiittle bit up from 3.54v
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2018, 04:18 AM   #1788
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post
what tune are you using? which header?


am DID drop, on log wot1, you can see am went to 0.88
maybe enrich the maf just a liiiittle bit up from 3.54v
OTS Stg 1 91 octane, stock exhaust system.

I set the initial IAM to 0.88 because I saw it was always 1 in previous logs after settling. As soon as I saw it go to 1 I did the pull and it didn't go down.
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 05:09 PM   #1789
craneom
Grease Monkey
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Long time reader, first time poster. I have been slowly working on my '13 BRZ and am really delving into self-tuning. I have been running the OFT v4.03 Stage 2+ tune paired with Gruppe-S catless UEL headers and an Invidia R400 exhaust and stock intake. I tweaked the idle up a hair to 800 rpm and adjusted the injector ratio to DI only at idle to help with idle hunting. Other than that, I added the throttle tip-in settings, fans and set the ignition advance to 1. After extensive mileage, the car is running quite rich with consistently high negative LTFT, shown in these logs; https://datazap.me/u/craneom/r104-hi...6-7-9-10-12-14 Since then, I have rescaled my MAF with VGI's tool and removed the throttle tip-in settings and the car feels better than it did before, but is now running a little on the lean side with positive LTFTs and slight knock up top. https://datazap.me/u/craneom/r105-fi...6-7-9-10-12-14 IIRC, the target AFR for WOT is about 11.9 in the upper range. How lean is too lean?

Last edited by craneom; 10-15-2018 at 05:34 PM.
craneom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2018, 11:43 PM   #1790
Mr_Eyo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2017 Toyota 86
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 231
Thanks: 21
Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Got some low RPM/light throttle knock earlier tonight. Any idea what's going on here?
https://datazap.me/u/protoformx/log-...om=12405-12470
Mr_Eyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2018, 03:51 AM   #1791
halujeddo
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Drives: Subaru BRZ
Location: Turkey
Posts: 20
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
This is belongs to a friend of mine.
Car is MY17, K00G, EU spec manual BRZ.

Mods:
Tomei UEL catless header
Tomei op
Perrin silicone intake hose
Panel filter
OFT 4.03 stg2+ tune
RON95 fuel (only option in this country)
Oil catch can

Too much negative FLKC and too much negative LTFT.
Bad gas mainly causes FLKC but is that much normal just because of ron95?
What causes that much negative LTFT?

Do you think is there any problem beside bad fuel?

https://datazap.me/u/halujeddo/log-1...0&data=1-10-12
halujeddo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2018, 04:20 AM   #1792
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,196
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,067 Times in 775 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
v4 k00g sucks bad, and the tune makes no sense
copy v4 b01c tables to your k00g tune and try again
timing could be too high cause also of the fuel you get in ur country, so lower a bit base timing B and check maf svaling
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post:
halujeddo (10-29-2018)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RGM Supercharged 86 performance data TheGooseman AFRICA 14 12-13-2014 01:15 AM
Interpreting Ecutek Data Logs? cuddefred Software Tuning 3 09-02-2013 12:55 PM
VIR - Impressions/Pics/Logs/Video (Track Daze) swift996 Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 39 08-30-2013 09:21 AM
Noise tube delete air/fuel logs? jm1681 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 13 10-17-2012 04:57 PM
ECU Data Logger Motordyne Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 5 07-18-2012 09:27 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.