|
Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-30-2018, 04:54 PM | #71 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 101
Thanks: 39
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Make an assumption and try it, keep making changes till you're happy. Go to the next zone medium acceleration, than full acceleration. At low rpm less timing, max out in the mid range and less on the top end.. Back the exhaust timing down and flatten the map... Stock exhaust you can open the cams up faster. Good exhaust progressively open the cams. The easiest way to measure gains is using dyno apps and timed acceleration runs from 30-60 in 2nd gear.
__________________
Enkei TS9 18 X 8, Michelin Sport 4S 225 40 18, Flex Fuel, Edelbrock Supercharger, P & L header, Nameless front pipe, V1 cat back, Aluminum Driveshaft, pvc delete, med duck bill, KW V3, Whiteline 20 and 18 mm bars, Buddy Club and SPL control arms, Toe Arms, motor and trans mounts, Whiteline bushings, SHR stage II tune.
|
|
12-30-2018, 05:09 PM | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Drives: 2013 FRS
Location: WISCONSIN
Posts: 101
Thanks: 39
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Dyno chart from perfexpert app.
__________________
Enkei TS9 18 X 8, Michelin Sport 4S 225 40 18, Flex Fuel, Edelbrock Supercharger, P & L header, Nameless front pipe, V1 cat back, Aluminum Driveshaft, pvc delete, med duck bill, KW V3, Whiteline 20 and 18 mm bars, Buddy Club and SPL control arms, Toe Arms, motor and trans mounts, Whiteline bushings, SHR stage II tune.
|
03-12-2021, 12:44 AM | #73 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 358
Thanks: 218
Thanked 205 Times in 105 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
It's my turn now to screw up my AVCS. I know, the last update was 3 years ago but there's a wealth of information here which I would like to ride on
My tune is currently based on Wayno's and I'm looking to see what I can do to the AVCS to make things better. I did four runs each with the intake AVCS offset by -4, +4 and +8. Figured the tune would be already be pretty close to being optimized which shouldn't be far off. So after a total of 16 pulls (got a flashlight shone on my face by a cop while flashing a tune but he was cool) these are my results: Stock intake Gutted 2013 OEM header Stock exhaust, apart from Fujitsubo catback Zeroed out KCA to reduce ignition timing Between the 2800 and 5200 rpm range there are 3 peaks (!) which Shiv caters for two of them whereas Wayno consolidates them as a single peak. OFT Wayno Now there's the issue which @Tor had also experienced, where the VVT was unable to catch up to the targeted value... while it does make sense that the values could be averaged out, but mine is showing really substantial dips. 36 to 48 to 36 back again as shown by the VVT tool from 3600 rpm to 4000rpm - is there something I'm missing? Should I cater for these peaks and valleys for the tune? |
03-12-2021, 01:06 AM | #74 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,195
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,065 Times in 774 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
first you always want those 40 in INTAKE to be 39
almost any of our cars can't reach 40 and this can trigger the vvt closed loop badly, like shutting it down for a second while in 6th gear in those engine load zones then, vvt is imprecise and it tries its best to follow the target, but you can see by yourself that specially the exhaust cam, they tend to drift a bit specially on large swings it s a compromise, if you get a strange slope with the vvt cams in your logs, try to adjust them in a slighty different way that won t cause a strange output it wont go from 48 to 36 to 48 in so few rpms. it will just swing strangely trying to follow it |
03-12-2021, 02:52 AM | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 358
Thanks: 218
Thanked 205 Times in 105 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
On the VVT shutoff, unfortunately I didn't do any 6th gear runs but most of the intake values are about 39 in the 40 range - no shutoffs though. |
|
03-12-2021, 08:24 AM | #76 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,195
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,065 Times in 774 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
as you said, that is for WOT, and that swing that you have in your calculated WOT best vvt has no sense to be honest
and in part throttle, the engine load varies so much that the ecu is going to pickup so many different cells of your vvt tables, that the output result will be anyway a "corrected" smoothed average of what it encounters. Don t use that tool for part throttling tuning also why vvt#1 and #vvt2 has same value? one should be intake , one exhaust I think something wrong or not attendible in your datalogs Stock tune reach maximum 37 in intake advace, most cars wont reach 39, quite a few wont even keep 38 stable I faced this with many people I tuned, if your car takes 40 of intake good, good for you and your car but keeping it max 39 , like your vvt system reaches, will help the vvt closed loop working better, it 's pretty slow to be a closed loop, then do what you please! |
03-12-2021, 08:44 AM | #77 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 358
Thanks: 218
Thanked 205 Times in 105 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
What do you mean when it's 'slow' in closed loop I had always thought AVCS works the same in either open/closed loop conditions. |
|
03-12-2021, 10:57 AM | #78 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,195
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,065 Times in 774 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
i mean that the vvt system has a closed loop on its own, to try following the target.. I wasnt talking about the fueling
with slow , i just mean slow.. i mean look at sharp variations in the logs sometimes and then look the target, you have to keep this in mind while trying different cam tables |
03-12-2021, 11:41 AM | #79 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 358
Thanks: 218
Thanked 205 Times in 105 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Meanwhile, here's my intake table for now... have only changed 0.95 onwards and blended in 0.9. Will monitor the stability part in a couple of days. I know it's probably going to cause a lot of swinging and other issues - but nothing ventured nothing gained |
|
03-12-2021, 01:17 PM | #80 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,195
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,065 Times in 774 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
again, why put 43 if physical limit is 40, and your real limit is 39 ?
why stressing the ecu in trying to advance more and keep accumulating closed loop errors that will mess again with the vvt when the target changes and the actuator is slow to react, and the ecu pushes against it ? you can create even more inconsistency tried my best to help i 'll try to show you an example from some logs i have, what happens when you put unrealistic/difficult to actuate values on vvt give me some moments |
03-12-2021, 02:01 PM | #81 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 358
Thanks: 218
Thanked 205 Times in 105 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
43 is set because from the logs it can occasionally hold 40-42 although not as reliable as 38-39 most of the time. I'd love to see those logs - I won't mind waiting |
|
03-14-2021, 01:53 PM | #82 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 358
Thanks: 218
Thanked 205 Times in 105 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Update - so after doing more analysis on the logs the >40 values only happens when it's ramping up - it will not hold on for long and the values drop to 39-40 later.
I'm mentioning the obvious here - it's as if the actuator 'overshoots' before settling on nominal values. And funnily enough it's not seen as an abnormality or an error by the ECU. Maybe actual hardcoded values in the assembly logic or something... edit: Was mentioned before intakes have a range between -10 to 40. For mechanical hardware I suppose working it at its extreme ranges has its own issues. Last edited by Compelica; 03-14-2021 at 10:16 PM. Reason: clarity |
03-14-2021, 03:42 PM | #83 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,195
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,065 Times in 774 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
it just a little imprecise by design to me, it s commanded by oil pressure
funny is some cars act differently with the same setup same cam timings, maybe different oil give other results That overshoot was what I want to show you with my logs, tomorrow when i ll have more time |
03-20-2021, 12:50 PM | #84 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives:
Posts: 96
Thanks: 8
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Give me both table intake and exhaust and i will test on my dyno
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AVCS tuning | Turdinator | Software Tuning | 9 | 11-24-2015 01:31 PM |
AVCS tuning for power and economy | KoolBRZ | Software Tuning | 8 | 04-13-2015 11:07 AM |
Feeler: Dyno Tuning Session via Jamesm @ HRI tuning | sw20kosh | Northern California | 27 | 11-28-2014 07:53 PM |
Delicious Tuning - Dyno Tuning Weekend at Mann Engineering's (San Jose, CA) | DeliciousTuning | Announcements, Contests, Giveaways | 6 | 09-19-2013 05:55 PM |
Dyno Nights @ FR&R tuning | GeeTee86 | AFRICA | 1 | 06-25-2013 04:25 AM |